Obama’s Presidential Policy Directive: Pixie Dust 2.0

Back when John Yoo was finding ways to authorize President Bush’s illegal wiretap program — especially spying on Americans who were not agents of a foreign power — he changed the meaning of certain limits in EO 12333 without rewriting EO 12333. The President didn’t have to change EO 12333 to reflect actual practice, Yoo determined (relying on an Iran-Contra precedent), because ignoring EO 12333 amounted to modifying it.

An executive order cannot limit a President. There is no constitutional requirement for a President to issue a new executive order whenever he wishes to depart from the terms of a previous executive order. Rather than violate an executive order, the President has instead modified or waived it.

I call this pixie-dusting, where the Executive makes his own orders and directives disappear in secret.

Poof!

The use of pixie-dust — so recently used to justify spying on people while pretending not to spy on them — ought to give you pause when you read this passage from President Obama’s Presidential Policy Directive limiting US spying overseas (or, frankly, everything he said today, which all consists of the Executive exercising its prerogative to change and oversee Executive actions, but in no way includes any teeth to sustain such changes).

Nothing in this directive shall be construed to prevent me from exercising my constitutional authority, including as Commander in Chief, Chief Executive, and in the conduct of foreign affairs, as well as my statutory authority. Consistent with this principle, a recipient of this directive may at any time recommend to me, through the APNSA, a change to the policies and procedures contained in this directive.

Effectively Obama is laying out his prerogative to pixie dust this PPD.

And while the President admittedly would always have such prerogative, he didn’t include such a paragraph in his cyberwar PPD (which, of course, wasn’t meant to be public).

This PPD was designed to be ignored.

And I suspect our friends and adversaries know that.

Tweet about this on Twitter23Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook15Google+3Email to someone

18 Responses to Obama’s Presidential Policy Directive: Pixie Dust 2.0

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @K_isanasshole @JasonLeopold @johnknefel See, this is what I get for hanging out with Marcy and Jason. Thought everyone was talking.
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @brahmresnik @MontgomeryforCA Actually, I know a fair amount about the FBI, and I think Brahm is smarter.
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @DuffelBlog: Operation: Strike ISIS And Help Moderate Rebels But Don’t Actually Topple Assad Because Oh Fuck It, We’re Doing It Live
33mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @rgoodlaw @SarahKnuckey @rdevro ...instead of just issuing a multiple choice pick the one you like sheet. But I am pretty cynical.
33mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @rgoodlaw @SarahKnuckey @rdevro Well, fair question! Okay, you got me on that one. I am always surprised when they actually pick one...
34mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JasonLeopold @joshgerstein Nice ride though.
37mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @mollycrabapple: Lovely that Bahrain, which crushed it's own Arab Spring with torture and bullets, and Saudi, which helped them do it, a…
40mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Ali_Gharib Off with your head!
41mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @rgoodlaw @SarahKnuckey @rdevro Question not "why not" but why would it? How is ISIL a threat to US? Even US officials say its not currently
43mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @SarahKnuckey: Why do lawyers question Syria strikes legality? http://t.co/qcKCznzGaD http://t.co/Y5QCPmU7bX http://t.co/AB90yROCmJ http…
48mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @azcapmedia @DanCBarr Wow. Not sure how much that helps at this point in Symington's career, but didn't see that coming.
49mreplyretweetfavorite