DOD Complains about “Speculative” Risk of Bulk Collection

Maybe I have a sick sense of humor.

But I laughed at the irony of this NYT story about how Edward Snowden used a web-crawler to scrape data from the NSA’s servers.

In paragraphs 28 and 29 (of 29), Defense Intelligence Agency head Michael Flynn admits what he has avoided admitting in public hearings: he has no fucking clue what Snowden took.

The head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, told lawmakers last week that Mr. Snowden’s disclosures could tip off adversaries to American military tactics and operations, and force the Pentagon to spend vast sums to safeguard against that. But he admitted a great deal of uncertainty about what Mr. Snowden possessed.

“Everything that he touched, we assume that he took,” said General Flynn, including details of how the military tracks terrorists, of enemies’ vulnerabilities and of American defenses against improvised explosive devices. He added, “We assume the worst case.”

DOD doesn’t actually know what Snowden took. They know he had access to a bunch of files on military operations.

But that leaves open the question of how Mr. Snowden chose the search terms to obtain his trove of documents, and why, according to James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, they yielded a disproportionately large number of documents detailing American military movements, preparations and abilities around the world.

But DOD doesn’t know whether he just touched them, or took them with him. It doesn’t know whether he deleted any he took before turning them over to journalists.

For his part, Snowden says DOD’s claims he deliberately took military information are unfounded.

In his statement, Mr. Snowden denied any deliberate effort to gain access to any military information. “They rely on a baseless premise, which is that I was after military information,” Mr. Snowden said.

Snowden suggests any military information he got, he got incidentally. DOD will just have to trust him.

Nevertheless, DOD will assume the worst because that’s the only way to protect DOD equities — and indeed, the lives of our military service members (that is, if Flynn’s claims are true; given his track record I don’t necessarily believe they are).

The necessity of protecting people and secret plans because of a potential risk is actually not funny at all. Indeed, it points to the problem inherent with bulk collection conducted in secret: Those potentially targeted by it have to assume the worst to protect themselves.

Mind you, if Sam Alito were a fair and balanced kind of guy, he’d tell DOD to suck it up. The risk of this bulk collection inflicting harm on military operations is speculative.

Respondents’ claim of future injury is too speculative to establish the well-established requirement that certain injury must be “certainly impending.”

But I think Alito is wrong. I definitely don’t fault DOD for adjusting to potential risks given the lack of certainty over which of their most sensitive secrets bulk collection has compromised.

If it is a problem that Snowden touched or maybe even incidentally collected data that could cause DOD great harm — if it is understandable that DOD would assume and prepare for the worst — then NSA needs to shut down its own indiscriminate scraping of data from all over the world. Because it is imposing the same kinds of risk and costs and worries to private individuals all over the world.

Update: Eli Lake got sources who received DIA’s briefing on their Snowden report to distinguish between what DIA knows and what they’re just assuming.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+6Email to someone

14 Responses to DOD Complains about “Speculative” Risk of Bulk Collection

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz Heartfelt condolences to Krista Keating Joseph tonight.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Always great to focus on Clinton in November when Sanders is kicking her ass in May https://t.co/1fhd2bUs2a
7mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jaketapper He was a great kid. Especially well balanced for the storm he grew up in. Terrible loss.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jadler1969 Sure, I'd love to have someone other than Garland for that reason, but that won't be in GOP consideration
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Will_Bunch OOOOOOOH
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Will_Bunch: A few guitars and you could have the "Addicted to Love" video https://t.co/mE21HcmqLI
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz You going to make it @aliarau ? https://t.co/wwuy0WxLzY
18mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @imillhiser @ChuckGrassley It isn't going to get better than Garland Chuck. Get off your butt and do it.
21mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @AthertonKD: Oh dear god 20 Committee is going to head Trump's NSA/Department of Homeland Phrenology
22mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @BernieSanders: The political revolution wins in Indiana! Thank you. https://t.co/Ix7wutAw2g
22mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ChemiShalev Uh, you mean like continuing to win primary elections consistently and clearly? Yeah, should just quit!
23mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Ugarles @Popehat Details.
24mreplyretweetfavorite
February 2014
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728