NSA May Not Voyeuristically Pore Through Email But GCHQ Voyeuristically Pores Through WebCam Pictures

Back in James Clapper’s very first attempt to dismiss his lies to Ron Wyden, he said,

“What I said was, the NSA does not voyeuristically pore through U.S. citizens’ e-mails. I stand by that,” Clapper told National Journal in a telephone interview.

Apparently, however, NSA’s partner goes one step beyond that, with NSA”s assistance: GCHQ pores through bulk collected webcam photos, including those of US persons, of Yahoo’s users.

Britain’s surveillance agency GCHQ, with aid from the National Security Agency, intercepted and stored the webcam images of millions of internet users not suspected of wrongdoing, secret documents reveal.

GCHQ files dating between 2008 and 2010 explicitly state that a surveillance program codenamed Optic Nerve collected still images of Yahoo webcam chats in bulk and saved them to agency databases, regardless of whether individual users were an intelligence target or not.

This includes the 3 to 11% of images that show nudity.

Sexually explicit webcam material proved to be a particular problem for GCHQ, as one document delicately put it: “Unfortunately … it would appear that a surprising number of people use webcam conversations to show intimate parts of their body to the other person. Also, the fact that the Yahoo software allows more than one person to view a webcam stream without necessarily sending a reciprocal stream means that it appears sometimes to be used for broadcasting pornography.”

The document estimates that between 3% and 11% of the Yahoo webcam imagery harvested by GCHQ contains “undesirable nudity”.

Given past discussions of circumcision in regards to terrorist suspects, it’s only a matter of time before GCHQ defends its nudity stash because such evidence can be proof of radicalization (heh). Plus, we already know that NSA and GCHQ like to use targets’ online porn habits to discredit them.

Coming soon to an “oversight” hearing near you: James Clapper refuses to talk about this invasion of an American company’s customers’ privacy because it occurs under EO 12333 and liaison partnerships, and therefore is not subject to Congressional oversight.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+4Email to someone

10 Responses to NSA May Not Voyeuristically Pore Through Email But GCHQ Voyeuristically Pores Through WebCam Pictures

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @normative: We all remember where Modi got the "stitch your name in a pinstripe suit" idea, right? http://t.co/boCRULFXn9 http://t.co/11
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @tweetsintheME: It is so messed up that Gen. Dempsey is sponsoring an essay competition about King Abdullah. So, so messed up. http://t.…
18mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Is Boehner’s Netanyahu Invite Unconstitutional? http://t.co/VJmkTwc3pg Yes, it turns out, it probably is. cc: @lrozen
31mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel From yesterday: To Avenge Mr. Merlin, CIA Exposed Mrs. Merlin https://t.co/RwnkVr9oeN
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @kgosztola: Search warrants against WikiLeaks staff: Justice Department, Google & US media silence threaten press freedom http://t.co/AX
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @robertcaruso: quick hit from me on why @NWS (the National Weather Service) uses all capital letters. Answer: *Thomas Jefferson* https:/…
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Boehner "breached the intended constitutional separation of powers in the conduct of foreign affairs." http://t.co/DmI5TmkVmb
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @TheBradBlog Yeah, yeah yeah. Just do it!
11hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @JasonLeopold: Interrogator who oversaw Gitmo detainee Mohamedou Slahi's torture reviewed a book on Amazon. Read what it was abt https:/…
12hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @carolrosenberg: From today's briefing with the chief prosecutor, BGen Martins: He's asked for exec branch copy of full RDI Report, won'…
12hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Hey @SenJohnMcCain why do you think Netanyahu+Israeli elections come before dignity of the US elected Executive Branch? Don't embarrass us.
12hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Krhawkins5 Right. But there was a milestone. Was it 1000? So maybe @TyreJim is right; You need to do more Brennan-bashing?
12hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2014
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728