NSA May Not Voyeuristically Pore Through Email But GCHQ Voyeuristically Pores Through WebCam Pictures

Back in James Clapper’s very first attempt to dismiss his lies to Ron Wyden, he said,

“What I said was, the NSA does not voyeuristically pore through U.S. citizens’ e-mails. I stand by that,” Clapper told National Journal in a telephone interview.

Apparently, however, NSA’s partner goes one step beyond that, with NSA”s assistance: GCHQ pores through bulk collected webcam photos, including those of US persons, of Yahoo’s users.

Britain’s surveillance agency GCHQ, with aid from the National Security Agency, intercepted and stored the webcam images of millions of internet users not suspected of wrongdoing, secret documents reveal.

GCHQ files dating between 2008 and 2010 explicitly state that a surveillance program codenamed Optic Nerve collected still images of Yahoo webcam chats in bulk and saved them to agency databases, regardless of whether individual users were an intelligence target or not.

This includes the 3 to 11% of images that show nudity.

Sexually explicit webcam material proved to be a particular problem for GCHQ, as one document delicately put it: “Unfortunately … it would appear that a surprising number of people use webcam conversations to show intimate parts of their body to the other person. Also, the fact that the Yahoo software allows more than one person to view a webcam stream without necessarily sending a reciprocal stream means that it appears sometimes to be used for broadcasting pornography.”

The document estimates that between 3% and 11% of the Yahoo webcam imagery harvested by GCHQ contains “undesirable nudity”.

Given past discussions of circumcision in regards to terrorist suspects, it’s only a matter of time before GCHQ defends its nudity stash because such evidence can be proof of radicalization (heh). Plus, we already know that NSA and GCHQ like to use targets’ online porn habits to discredit them.

Coming soon to an “oversight” hearing near you: James Clapper refuses to talk about this invasion of an American company’s customers’ privacy because it occurs under EO 12333 and liaison partnerships, and therefore is not subject to Congressional oversight.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+4Email to someone

10 Responses to NSA May Not Voyeuristically Pore Through Email But GCHQ Voyeuristically Pores Through WebCam Pictures

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @IanPGunn @JRSigety True! Cracks me up they even need to do this in TX. Here I'd fax in a notice of appearance/not guilty plea and court...
41sreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JRSigety @IanPGunn I admire the go git em attitude, but you are going to live tweet a stinking misdemeanor arraignment?? Heh.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @joshgerstein @johngramlich Come on Josh, this will make things peachy again!
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Trump's America https://t.co/ZEyFD5Z5Ca
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Similarly, there is no reason for Clintons to drop out, if they quit being whiny ass titty babies. https://t.co/qJub2Bij7u
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Pete Rose has a point https://t.co/UCRPDf2POk
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DavidPurdum @WALLACHLEGAL @Norm_Clarke The man has a point.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @ggreenwald: To belittle Sanders, Dem pundits insisted Primary Season head-to-head polls are worthless. They've now overnight declared t…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DLind @radleybalko @LilianaSegura Yes, been saying it for a while!
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @DLind: @bmaz @radleybalko @LilianaSegura sorry did somebody say IIRIRA https://t.co/p8lrxJGm3N
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @OKnox Packers too.....Do it for Nibbles!
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @LilianaSegura: "I suspect that there have may well been innocent people who were executed" after AEDPA, a former WH lawyer told me. htt…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2014
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728