Mark Udall: CIA Took “Unprecedented Action” Against SSCI on Its Own Torture Report

Mark Udall just wrote Obama a sometimes cryptic letter asking him to commit to declassifying the Senate Intelligence Report torture report. In it, he:

  • Asserts a significant amount of what has been declassified about the torture program is “misleading and inaccurate”
  • Asks for more information about what led to the development of the CIA report
  • Asks why the findings of the CIA report were not included in CIA’s (John Brennan’s) response to the torture report
  • Suggests CIA is withholding the final version of the internal CIA report that corroborates many of SSCI’s report (it has provided a draft)
  • Says he will hold Caroline Krass’ nomination to be CIA General Counsel

But I’m particularly interested in this oblique comment:

As you are aware, the CIA has recently taken unprecedented action against the Committee in relation to the internal CIA review, and I find those actions to be incredibly troubling for the Committee’s oversight responsibilities and for our democracy. It is essential that the Committee be able to do its oversight work — consistent with our constitutional principle of the separation of powers — without the CIA posing impediments or obstacles as it is today.

“Unprecedented” is a pretty strong word.

Senator Udall’s office was unable to offer more clarity about this unprecedented action.

Updated: Changed the title because it implied Udall was saying this unprecedented action was about covering up torture, which is more than he said.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

19 Responses to Mark Udall: CIA Took “Unprecedented Action” Against SSCI on Its Own Torture Report

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @JohnWonderlich Undoubtedly. I do not excuse Hillary. (Or anyone else who has done this, which is ... everyone.) So how do we solve it?
39sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @aagave Yes. And he relied on known facts and direct experience and you relied on bluster. @cjoh
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Nor did top secret email system prevent a slew of John Yoo emails from disappearing. Or CIA emails. Also, IRS emails disappeared too.
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel On Hillary and email control, remember that White House control of emails didn't prevent a slew of emails from disappearing in 2003.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @aagave It is possible, believe it or not, for more than one thing to be true at once. @cjoh
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @aagave Again, your point might be right, but thus far you have far less evidence than @cjoh presented. And yours don't make his untrue.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @aagave They're not assumptions. They're known facts. Which is why your complaints are so stupid. Bc you're willfully ignoring facts. @cjoh
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @aagave But since you have discovered the one and only one reason why Hillary did this, carry on w/o considering full facts. @cjoh
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @aagave And if ostriches bear their offspring via eggs they can't fly. You're being utterly illogical & ignoring known facts. @cjoh
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @aagave I am not disputing that there are 3 other likely reasons: records laws, CGI, control. But there are many. @cjoh
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @aagave It strikes me you didn't read the piece bc you're just spewing nonsense right now. You HAVE heard of IT incompetence? @cjoh
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @gregorydjohnsen It's a merit badge you get after losing your second war.
11mreplyretweetfavorite
March 2014
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031