FISA Court Finally Discovers a Limit to the Word “Relevant”

A few weeks back I laughed that, in a probable attempt to score political points against those challenging the phone dragnet by asking to retain the phone dragnet longer than 5 years, DOJ had shown a rather unusual concern for defendant’s rights.

Judge Reggie Walton has just denied DOJ’s motion. In doing so he has found limits to the word “relevant” that otherwise seem unheard of at the FISC in recent memory.

For its part, the government makes no attempt to explain why it believes the records that are subject to destruction are relevant to the civil cases. The government merely notes that “‘[r]elevant’ in this context means relevant for purposes of discovery, … including information that relates to the claims or defenses of any party, as well as information that is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” Motion at 6. Similarly, the government asserts that “[b]ased on the issues raised by Plaintiffs,” the information must be retained, but it fails to identify what those issues are and how the records might shed light on them. Id. at 7. Finally, the motion asserts, without any explanation, that “[b]ased on the claims raised and the relief sought, a more limited retention of the BR metadata is not possible as there is no way for the Government to know in advance and then segregate and retain only the BR metadata specifically relevant to the identified lawsuits.” Id. Of course, questions of relevance are ultimately matters for the courts entertaining the civil litigation to resolve. But the government now requests this Court to afford substantial weight to the purported interests of the civil litigants in retaining the BR metadata relative to the primary interests of the United States persons whose information the government seeks to retain. The government’s motion provides scant basis for doing so.

Shew. Given the way FISC has been defining the word “relevant” since 2004 to mean “virtually all,” I had thought the word had become utterly meaningless.

At least we know the word “relevant” has some limits at FISC, even if they’re unbelievably broad.

Mind you, I’m not sure whether FISC or the government is right in this case, as I do have concerns about the data from the troubled period during 2009 aging off.

But I will at least take some Friday afternoon amusement that the FISC just scolded the government about the word “relevant.”

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to FISA Court Finally Discovers a Limit to the Word “Relevant”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @wizardkitten I was 140 at 11:20, but in combo precinct where all the pols live.
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Why does Chamber of Commerce get to demand pre-clearance on bill that's supposed to be critical for national security? #CISA
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Really looking forward to inevitable @RalstonReports piece on how much fun Reid has had trolling McConnell's difficulties as Majority Leader
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Whitehouse talking about his CISA amendments that have been cleared by Chamber of Commerce. In case there was a Q abt who's driving CISA.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @matthewamiller I think there is a former Speaker and a current Congresswoman who both would beg to differ. @johnson_carrie @BresPolitico
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Dean Heller: CISA does not do enough to ensure PII stripped out before sharing.
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Good thing Miss Piggy and Kermit never had any children.
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @matthewamiller Or were all the guns in John Dingell's office just considered antique furniture? @johnson_carrie @BresPolitico
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @matthewamiller So under what circumstances do members who have guns in their office get them in? @johnson_carrie @BresPolitico
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @SenBobCorker: Senator Corker will hold a hearing on the State Department’s human trafficking report this Thursday at 10:00 a.m. ET.
41mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Is it just me or does Jerry Moran say "nuclear" differently every time he says it?
48mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @erinscafe @dcbigjohn @OKnox Fairly dubious krewe you are assembling here.....
48mreplyretweetfavorite
March 2014
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031