Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Visit Pee-Clob

The first panel of an all-day Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board hearing on Section 702 of FISA just finished.

It featured NSA General Counsel Raj De, ODNI General Counsel Robert Litt, Deputy AAG for National Security Brad Weigmann, and FBI General Counsel James Baker.

While there were a number of interesting disclosures — which I’ll get at in the future — the most striking aspect of the hearing was the tooth-pulling effort to get the panel to define the terms they use.

There were a slew of terms defined, among others including “minimization,” “bulk collection,” “PRISM,”

But the most interesting redefinitions were for “purge” and “search.”

After much tooth-pulling, James Dempsey got De to admit that NSA’s definition of the word “search” is different from the one used in the Fourth Amendment. Actually, that may not be entirely true: Sometimes the actual collection of data counts as a search, sometimes only the querying of it does. NSA gets to decide which is which, best as I can tell, in secret or in legal filings where it will serve to deprive someone of standing.

Then there’s “purge,” which I can’t hear anymore without seeing a pink speech bubble and scare quotes surrounding the word. Purge does not mean — as you might expect — “destroy.” Rather, it means only “remove from NSA systems in such a way that it cannot be used.” Which, best as I understand it, means they’re not actually destroying this data.

I do hope EFF figures that out before they argue the protection order for Section 215 today, as on those terms it seems increasingly clear NSA is not complying with the Jewel protection order.

“Purge.” To keep. Somewhere else.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

9 Responses to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Visit Pee-Clob

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @joesbooksthings It's your opinion that GOP should get no Qs after GOP Gov's handpicked EM poisoned a city of children? @NormOrnstein
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @NormOrnstein: Last GOP debate, foci on meaning of pro-life and 10th Amendment. No. Of Qs on Flint: zero. Political malpractice by ABC m…
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @ZoeTillman: 6th Circuit okays warrantless use of camera attached to a public utitliy pole to monitor man's activity for 10 weeks https:…
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @LynnRWebsterMD: Senator scrutinizes pharma links on government pain panel https://t.co/J4k8zU9mHN via @usnews Please also ensure payers…
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Uber Is Not the Future of Work https://t.co/fkq4FG4pkP
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Q: Has ANY presidential candidate talked about Pharma's role in opioid epidemic?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV I really need to unload the truck from the feed store run but Sulu has other ideas. https://t.co/D9tGCqub8V
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel "Rubio is embracing some of most lunatic ideas on the right...without most in the media hearing the dog whistle" https://t.co/WlRZPz4ZQN
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @B_D_Silver And when Hillary DOES win nomination, having had Bill make this attack makes him a fair target.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
March 2014
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031