Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Visit Pee-Clob

The first panel of an all-day Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board hearing on Section 702 of FISA just finished.

It featured NSA General Counsel Raj De, ODNI General Counsel Robert Litt, Deputy AAG for National Security Brad Weigmann, and FBI General Counsel James Baker.

While there were a number of interesting disclosures — which I’ll get at in the future — the most striking aspect of the hearing was the tooth-pulling effort to get the panel to define the terms they use.

There were a slew of terms defined, among others including “minimization,” “bulk collection,” “PRISM,”

But the most interesting redefinitions were for “purge” and “search.”

After much tooth-pulling, James Dempsey got De to admit that NSA’s definition of the word “search” is different from the one used in the Fourth Amendment. Actually, that may not be entirely true: Sometimes the actual collection of data counts as a search, sometimes only the querying of it does. NSA gets to decide which is which, best as I can tell, in secret or in legal filings where it will serve to deprive someone of standing.

Then there’s “purge,” which I can’t hear anymore without seeing a pink speech bubble and scare quotes surrounding the word. Purge does not mean — as you might expect — “destroy.” Rather, it means only “remove from NSA systems in such a way that it cannot be used.” Which, best as I understand it, means they’re not actually destroying this data.

I do hope EFF figures that out before they argue the protection order for Section 215 today, as on those terms it seems increasingly clear NSA is not complying with the Jewel protection order.

“Purge.” To keep. Somewhere else.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

9 Responses to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Visit Pee-Clob

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV RT @HuffmanHeadsUp: Severe T-Storm Warning #Gainesville #Alachua Co until 7:30. Damaging wind possible, along with localized flooding. http…
1mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Are the @NFL and their lickspittle lackeys on #Deflategate at @ESPN using titty porn bots to attack detractors?? http://t.co/B8ABlExDYo
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz #FreeTomBrady and grow some intellectual and legal balls of honesty you dissembling toady pieces of crap:----> @mortreport @espn @NFL
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz But then, @mortreport and self proclaimed WorldWideLeader™ @ESPN have fully earned this position of intellectual shame for toadying the @NFL
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz What an embarrassment for a genuine pro like @MortReport to have his hallowed ass caught in the credibility wringer http://t.co/zjBtnlGHSu
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @jonathanhsinger: Things Planned Parenthood is more popular than: NRA, GOP, Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, Donald Trump http://t.co/mGHnHTWViO http…
29mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz What are odds a dependent shill org like @espn, much less @mortreport, has intellectual honesty+balls to do the right thing?....Sadly, Zero
35mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @DanielLarison: Obama's many abuses of the 2001 AUMF http://t.co/YbzbsnosvU
37mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz If @ESPN's @MortReport is half the man he portrays himself to be, he will just come clean, burn duplicitous sources, and admit the truth.
37mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz So, @MortReport "has no issue with the NFL"?? What lickspittle crap after defaming and slandering a team and HOF Quarterback. #WhatAJoke
38mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @Taniel: Fox News poll should go a long way toward dooming Rick Perry's hopes of making the debate cut. 11th in most polls; 13th here, w…
40mreplyretweetfavorite
March 2014
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031