Algeria

The Targeted Killing Memos Shared with NYT, But Not Senate Intelligence Committee

According to the National Journal, one of the memos the Administration refuses to share with the intelligence committees authorizes the use of force in Algeria and, perhaps also in the same memo, with Mali.

Despite President Obama’s pledge in his State of the Union address to make the drone program “even more transparent to the American people and to the world,” his administration continues to resist efforts by Congress, even from fellow Democrats, to obtain the full range of classified legal memos justifying “targeted killing.”

A key reason for that reticence, according to two sources who have read the memos or are aware of their contents, is that the documents contain secret protocols with foreign governments,

[snip]

Others may have been signed with the leaders of Algeria and Mali, the legal expert said. Given the widespread unpopularity of the drone program, the disclosure of these agreements could prove extremely embarrassing both for the United States and partner governments.

The Senate Intelligence Committee can’t learn the details of what the government is up to, the Administration says, because even sharing information (much less publicizing details) about our agreements with governments like Algeria would be embarrassing for all parties involved.

So who are the former and current government officials and senior administration officials leaking information to the NYT about new efforts — including the use of unarmed drones — to target the Algerian militant Mokhtar Belmokhtar in Algeria and Mali?

The NYT reports that earlier concerns about conducting operations not covered by the 2001 AUMF have recently been allayed.

The idea of taking stronger action in the region has been supported in recent months by Michael Sheehan, the senior counterterrorism official at the Pentagon, and Daniel Benjamin, who until December was the senior State Department counterterrorism official. In the past, State Department lawyers have questioned whether the military action approved by Congress against Al Qaeda after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks authorized efforts to target extremists who were not clearly linked to the group. But according to some officials, those legal arguments  have recently been overcome.

“Those legal arguments have recently been overcome.” By the adoption of new OLC advice the Administration won’t share with Congress?

Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV @RobHyatt1 Congratulations on winning!
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JimWhiteGNV No, but you can probably rent your friend out to do others' sanding for them.
6mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Is there a support group for people addicted to sanding? Asking for a friend, of course.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @UrbanAchievr No. 1) neither US nor UK has way of backing people out of THEIR moral confusion 2) bc they've lost moral authority @abenomixx
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @UrbanAchievr LOL. You mean Bandar's folks? @abenomixx
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @UrbanAchievr No. I'm suggesting people who want to defeat Assad may not be motivated exclusively from Islamic extremism. @abenomixx
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @wizardkitten Yup. He's ducking too.
27mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @abenomixx I think you don't know what the word vanguard means. @UrbanAchievr
31mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @abenomixx You're suggesting fighting Hitler was unnecessary? @UrbanAchievr
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @wizardkitten By Repubs are you including Cuomo?
33mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @csoghoian You'll always have HTTPS to not shut up about.
34mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @SpyTalker @lrozen I think that mope thinks it is. That line caused me to not give a tinker's damn about his opinion.
36mreplyretweetfavorite
August 2014
S M T W T F S
« Jul    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31