The Targeted Killing Memos Shared with NYT, But Not Senate Intelligence Committee

According to the National Journal, one of the memos the Administration refuses to share with the intelligence committees authorizes the use of force in Algeria and, perhaps also in the same memo, with Mali.

Despite President Obama’s pledge in his State of the Union address to make the drone program “even more transparent to the American people and to the world,” his administration continues to resist efforts by Congress, even from fellow Democrats, to obtain the full range of classified legal memos justifying “targeted killing.”

A key reason for that reticence, according to two sources who have read the memos or are aware of their contents, is that the documents contain secret protocols with foreign governments,


Others may have been signed with the leaders of Algeria and Mali, the legal expert said. Given the widespread unpopularity of the drone program, the disclosure of these agreements could prove extremely embarrassing both for the United States and partner governments.

The Senate Intelligence Committee can’t learn the details of what the government is up to, the Administration says, because even sharing information (much less publicizing details) about our agreements with governments like Algeria would be embarrassing for all parties involved.

So who are the former and current government officials and senior administration officials leaking information to the NYT about new efforts — including the use of unarmed drones — to target the Algerian militant Mokhtar Belmokhtar in Algeria and Mali?

The NYT reports that earlier concerns about conducting operations not covered by the 2001 AUMF have recently been allayed.

The idea of taking stronger action in the region has been supported in recent months by Michael Sheehan, the senior counterterrorism official at the Pentagon, and Daniel Benjamin, who until December was the senior State Department counterterrorism official. In the past, State Department lawyers have questioned whether the military action approved by Congress against Al Qaeda after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks authorized efforts to target extremists who were not clearly linked to the group. But according to some officials, those legal arguments  have recently been overcome.

“Those legal arguments have recently been overcome.” By the adoption of new OLC advice the Administration won’t share with Congress?

Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel Seriously, I know not a chance in hell @chucktodd will report on KORUS outcomes, but maybe someone else can while we wait for TPP terms?
emptywheel @mattkbh No no no. The passive voice is for MSF bombing statements.
emptywheel .@chucktodd or if you can't explain TPP, then explain whether KORUS has lived up to promises and made our Asian pivot pivotier? @Atrios
emptywheel RT @nickmanes1: Good Lessenberry on the Flint water crisis.
bmaz .@KellyFlood3 @ScottGreenfield @wolmanj @Popehat Yes. This is, literally, written in the Book of Duh, or so I posit.
emptywheel @Atrios Silly. @chucktodd isn't paid to do policy reporting anymore. That doesn't sell ads. Horserace, horserace, horserace.
emptywheel @JonathanCohn And the timing may well be helpful (or maybe not!) @JAMyerson
emptywheel @JonathanCohn I don't think you have the timing w/o Bernie and upcoming debate. @JAMyerson
bmaz Attention Apple Computer Co. Current status is:
emptywheel RT @B_D_Silver: Gallup Gave Up. Here’s Why That Sucks. @HarryEnten @FiveThirtyEight
emptywheel @iwelsh No but Bernie has taken a "VT is a rural state w/guns" stance in the distant past.
October 2015
« Sep