Ali al-Bahlul

The Lawyers that Stayed, the Lawyers that Left

Charlie Savage covers a very troubling development in the case of Ali al-Bahlul, a Yemeni who is serving a life sentence for serving as Al Qaeda’s videographer.

After Hamdan had his conviction vacated by the DC Circuit last year because material support was not a war crime at the time of his support for al Qaeda, Bahlul’s conviction was put in jeopardy too. As Savage earlier reported, there was a debate among the national security lawyers. And in spite of the fact that almost everyone disagreed with Eric Holder on this count, Holder made them press forward anyway.

The Obama administration, after a high-level debate among its legal team, told a federal appeals court on Wednesday that the conviction of a Guantánamo Bay prisoner by a military commission in 2008 was valid even though the charges against him — including “conspiracy” and “material support for terrorism” — were not recognized as war crimes in international law.

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. decided to press forward with the case, fighting the appeal of a guilty verdict against the prisoner, a Yemeni man named Ali al-Bahlul. In an unusual move, Mr. Holder overruled the recommendation of the solicitor general, Donald B. Verrilli Jr., who had wanted to drop the case because the appeals court had rejected the same legal arguments in another case several months ago, according to officials familiar with the deliberations.

The chief prosecutor of the military commissions system, Brig. Gen. Mark Martins, had also urged the Justice Department to drop the case and pointedly did not sign the 22-page brief to the court on Wednesday. It concedes that the judges must side with Mr. Bahlul at this stage because of the earlier ruling in the other case, but argues that the earlier ruling was wrong.

It sure appears that Eric Holder is just counting on getting the same kind of batshit crazy ruling he got in Latif, so as to sustain his legally unjustified detention.

What’s especially interesting about this, however, is the Kremlinology. Back in early December over the course of two days time, both Jeh Johnson and Harold Koh resigned. It felt very much like a protest, or a refusal to be part of something that struck them as legally unsound (I thought then–as still suspect–it was partly a response to John Brennan’s halt of the effort to put drones on a sound legal footing).

And now we know that around that time, the Attorney General was overriding not just their advice, but that of most of the others involved in this, including the Solicitor General and the Military Commission Chief Prosecutor.

Yesterday’s brief, incidentally, was signed by the Acting Deputy General Counsel at DOD, not Johnson (of course).

So Johnson and Koh are gone. And Eric Holder? The Administration just announced he will stay into the second term. (And, not incidentally, yesterday I floated the suggestion that Lisa Monaco, who sided with Holder on this fight, would be named to replace FBI Director Mueller later this year; a number of smart people suggested that was a smart prediction.)

Update: In the WaPo version of this story, Steve Vladeck suggests that if the government really planned to push forward with an appeal of this to SCOTUS (that is, to reverse the ruling in Hamdan II), the language in the brief would have been stronger.

Incidentally, I wonder yet again about the case of the three Somalis in this context. Is this why they added a conspiracy charge to their indictment, to establish that as a precedent in this situation?

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @JohnWonderlich Oh, I dunno. I think they might well enjoy the prerogatives of private email sorting.
46sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Boehner is probably having his best day as Speaker ever. He managed to deliver on a promise w/o flubbing vote count, and ... BibiPalooza!!!
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DuaneG Thank you! It's one of those days...
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @michaelbkiefer Why need for a modified Allen charge??
4mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel Yes, in any case, if the judge goes on a rampage, the defendant can't get more than stacked and maxed. #Journalmalism
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Read how Petraeus crimes'd normally be "Free Handjob & iPad Day at Walt Disney World" for prosecutors but weren't. https://t.co/QKYDlWKjor
5mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Popehat: Updated my Petraeus post with the plea agreement, which makes his deal even sweeter. https://t.co/3UHhCaMIHy
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @chriswnews @william_pitts @michaelbkiefer I look forward to more ballpark cuisine reportage! Also, I NEED one of those hot dogs.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel "That means even if federal judge who sentences him goes on a rampage, he can't get > a year in federal prison" https://t.co/QKYDlWsIwT
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz We have a complex jury question! RT @william_pitts #JodiArias wearing purple. Or gold. DAMN YOU #TheDress !
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel No no. LA has the high speed car chases, AZ get the long necked furry critters. Just how it is.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@bmaz Who said they were gonna be loosed then lassoed in AZ again? Better to stage the scene where there's ice or snow.
11mreplyretweetfavorite
March 2015
S M T W T F S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031