Michael Sheehan

The Targeted Killing Memos Shared with NYT, But Not Senate Intelligence Committee

According to the National Journal, one of the memos the Administration refuses to share with the intelligence committees authorizes the use of force in Algeria and, perhaps also in the same memo, with Mali.

Despite President Obama’s pledge in his State of the Union address to make the drone program “even more transparent to the American people and to the world,” his administration continues to resist efforts by Congress, even from fellow Democrats, to obtain the full range of classified legal memos justifying “targeted killing.”

A key reason for that reticence, according to two sources who have read the memos or are aware of their contents, is that the documents contain secret protocols with foreign governments,


Others may have been signed with the leaders of Algeria and Mali, the legal expert said. Given the widespread unpopularity of the drone program, the disclosure of these agreements could prove extremely embarrassing both for the United States and partner governments.

The Senate Intelligence Committee can’t learn the details of what the government is up to, the Administration says, because even sharing information (much less publicizing details) about our agreements with governments like Algeria would be embarrassing for all parties involved.

So who are the former and current government officials and senior administration officials leaking information to the NYT about new efforts — including the use of unarmed drones — to target the Algerian militant Mokhtar Belmokhtar in Algeria and Mali?

The NYT reports that earlier concerns about conducting operations not covered by the 2001 AUMF have recently been allayed.

The idea of taking stronger action in the region has been supported in recent months by Michael Sheehan, the senior counterterrorism official at the Pentagon, and Daniel Benjamin, who until December was the senior State Department counterterrorism official. In the past, State Department lawyers have questioned whether the military action approved by Congress against Al Qaeda after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks authorized efforts to target extremists who were not clearly linked to the group. But according to some officials, those legal arguments  have recently been overcome.

“Those legal arguments have recently been overcome.” By the adoption of new OLC advice the Administration won’t share with Congress?

Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @Brasel_Sam But it would not be necessary even for 9/11 in that 2,977 counts of capital murder and conspiracy would have sufficed just fine
bmaz @Brasel_Sam Well, yes that certainly fits the statutes. Dylan Roof and Colorado most certainly do not.
emptywheel @MasaccioEW Cmon, it's a close game. You guys will get beat fair and square. ;p
emptywheel RT @BigMeanInternet: How much of what "Millennial" means is about adapting to declining median living standards? https://t.co/hePZcG63KZ ht…
emptywheel @dceiver Stanford bc fuck with standings
emptywheel BS call for the Lelanders.
emptywheel @dbrower Neither. My inner sentiment. Our dog is named after Christian McCaffrey's father.
emptywheel Stanford unsuccessfully trying to rally a bunch of geeks (I'm a geek!) to cheer like non-geeks. Didn't work.
bmaz RT @PriestOfStEs: @BklynMiddleton @libbyannvan the hard part is these types of killers can have more than one motive. Incoherent pathology …
emptywheel @stephanie_a517 I do try not to RT things that aren't worth the advertisement. Now I want to do mushrooms and make quinoa. @openculture
emptywheel @ErrataRob Surely revenge for playing the crazy uncle on Thursday.
November 2015
« Oct