Stanely McChrystal

Is David Petraeus Leaking to Undercut the President? Or Is Someone Framing Him?

The WaPo has the latest in seemingly yearly series of leaks of Top Secret cables designed to undercut the President’s plan to withdraw from Afghanistan.

The U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan sent a top-secret cable to Washington last month warning that the persistence of enemy havens in Pakistan was placing the success of the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan in jeopardy, U.S. officials said.

The cable, written by Ryan C. Crocker, amounted to an admission that years of U.S. efforts to curtail insurgent activity in Pakistan by the lethal Haqqani network, a key Taliban ally, were failing.

The hints and feints the article offers about who leaked the memo provide ample entertainment for a Saturday afternoon.

Note the way the WaPo describes its sources inconsistently. It offers this quote from a senior defense official.

“The sanctuaries are a deal-killer for the [Afghan war] strategy,” said a senior defense official who is familiar with the ongoing debate and who, like several officials in this story, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal deliberations. [my emphasis]

But then the WaPo suggests military leaders have motive to leak the cable, distinguishing between “defense” and “military” officials.

The cable, which was described by several officials familiar with its contents, could be used as ammunition by senior military officials who favor more aggressive action by the United States against the Haqqani havens in Pakistan. It also could buttress calls from senior military officials for a more gradual withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan as the 2014 deadline for ending combat operations approaches.

These military officials have maintained for months that the strategy of targeting raids against Taliban leadership and building local Afghan governance is showing impressive results. [my emphasis]

Mind you, none of these military officials seem to be directly quoted here–at least not defined as military officials. The comment might just reflect the knowledge of Greg Jaffe, WaPo’s military writer. Though it would be consistent if a General or two leaked such a cable–after all, Stanley McChrystal is assumed to have leaked a similar cable during Obama’s Afghanistan review in 2009, for similar reason.

Yet I’m most interested in this quote, of someone whose affiliation was rather pointedly (given the description of defense and military sources) not identified.

“There’s no debate about the importance of going after Haqqani . . . and Taliban militants who launch attacks into Afghanistan,” one U.S. official said. “Support for this is universal.” [my emphasis]

The article also defaults to “US officials” elsewhere, though that could be because the sources came from multiple agencies. Note, “US official” can be used to refer to members of Congress, as well as agency officials.

In any case should we assume these unmarked sources are intelligence ones–the beat of Greg Miller, the WaPo’s intelligence writer and the other byline on the story?

→']);" class="more-link">Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @TyreJim I thought it was legal so long as you have a half order of fries on the table? @dmataconis
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MeritNotParty Anyway. Heading to bed. It's been absolutely hysterical chatting. Thanks.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MeritNotParty Tho I agree, you defended Eli--good and bad--far more aggressively.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MeritNotParty Starting where you said the Giants (or, oddly, the iggles) didn't qualify, but the Jehries (or whatev) did?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MeritNotParty It was fun. As I said, I'll link back to this next season if Bravo reups the series.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MeritNotParty Since you missed that entire point the conversation descended into you performing my point perfectly. To a T. Thanks!
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MeritNotParty Every single time an NFC fan raise off-point comments to fluff their team? Proved the point. Not a gender issue. Abt surface
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MeritNotParty Yes. ENTIRE CONVERSATION was premised on similarities in irrationality and cattiness bt NFC East fans and Real Housewives
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MeritNotParty So no. You can't find a link? Thought so. Bravo fodder. Like I said.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MeritNotParty Still waiting for your link where I call you a "girl." Until then you're just Bravo fodder.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MeritNotParty No. No. You have missed the point entirely. But apparently have real gender insecurities.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MeritNotParty Go ahead link it.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728