Stanely McChrystal

Is David Petraeus Leaking to Undercut the President? Or Is Someone Framing Him?

The WaPo has the latest in seemingly yearly series of leaks of Top Secret cables designed to undercut the President’s plan to withdraw from Afghanistan.

The U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan sent a top-secret cable to Washington last month warning that the persistence of enemy havens in Pakistan was placing the success of the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan in jeopardy, U.S. officials said.

The cable, written by Ryan C. Crocker, amounted to an admission that years of U.S. efforts to curtail insurgent activity in Pakistan by the lethal Haqqani network, a key Taliban ally, were failing.

The hints and feints the article offers about who leaked the memo provide ample entertainment for a Saturday afternoon.

Note the way the WaPo describes its sources inconsistently. It offers this quote from a senior defense official.

“The sanctuaries are a deal-killer for the [Afghan war] strategy,” said a senior defense official who is familiar with the ongoing debate and who, like several officials in this story, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal deliberations. [my emphasis]

But then the WaPo suggests military leaders have motive to leak the cable, distinguishing between “defense” and “military” officials.

The cable, which was described by several officials familiar with its contents, could be used as ammunition by senior military officials who favor more aggressive action by the United States against the Haqqani havens in Pakistan. It also could buttress calls from senior military officials for a more gradual withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan as the 2014 deadline for ending combat operations approaches.

These military officials have maintained for months that the strategy of targeting raids against Taliban leadership and building local Afghan governance is showing impressive results. [my emphasis]

Mind you, none of these military officials seem to be directly quoted here–at least not defined as military officials. The comment might just reflect the knowledge of Greg Jaffe, WaPo’s military writer. Though it would be consistent if a General or two leaked such a cable–after all, Stanley McChrystal is assumed to have leaked a similar cable during Obama’s Afghanistan review in 2009, for similar reason.

Yet I’m most interested in this quote, of someone whose affiliation was rather pointedly (given the description of defense and military sources) not identified.

“There’s no debate about the importance of going after Haqqani . . . and Taliban militants who launch attacks into Afghanistan,” one U.S. official said. “Support for this is universal.” [my emphasis]

The article also defaults to “US officials” elsewhere, though that could be because the sources came from multiple agencies. Note, “US official” can be used to refer to members of Congress, as well as agency officials.

In any case should we assume these unmarked sources are intelligence ones–the beat of Greg Miller, the WaPo’s intelligence writer and the other byline on the story?

Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @Carter_PE: This NYT article on @CIA drones by @MarkMazzettiNYT & @mattapuzzo is 1 of best pieces of #natsec journalism I've read http:/…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel CNN, who 24/7ed the spectacles of lost planes and ISIL beheadings, also would not turn away from the WHCD. #SpectacleNewsNetwork
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @BaFana3: Untouched by Saudi jet strikes, Al Qaeda militants in control of Hadhramaut capital Mukalla organizing mass anti-drone strike …
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @BaFana3: Power/fuel/telecoms cuts : #Yemen activists face difficulty sending videos, photos & reports on extreme violence of #Saudi att…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@Krhawkins5 Well, it is true that when Aaron Burr assassinated Americans, he did it to their face, rather than via secret drone meeting.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @TheTweetOfGod: Bruce Jenner is the first Kardashian woman I can tolerate.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @adamsteinbaugh Neelix, is that you?
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jeremyscahill Sad thing is that almost "could" be true, WHCD is that absurd. Tho would be Stewart, Nooners, Lil Bow Wow+a media chihuahua
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Re: Baltimore. And oh so true: https://t.co/oHticeJWRg
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@joshgreenman There were a few good highlights in Strong's routine, but overall I'd say C at best. Lot of dud in it.
10hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @gatorhoops A really stupid move.
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @WesleyLowery: That was Cecily Strong at WHCD
10hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2015
S M T W T F S
« Mar    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930