Stanely McChrystal

Is David Petraeus Leaking to Undercut the President? Or Is Someone Framing Him?

The WaPo has the latest in seemingly yearly series of leaks of Top Secret cables designed to undercut the President’s plan to withdraw from Afghanistan.

The U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan sent a top-secret cable to Washington last month warning that the persistence of enemy havens in Pakistan was placing the success of the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan in jeopardy, U.S. officials said.

The cable, written by Ryan C. Crocker, amounted to an admission that years of U.S. efforts to curtail insurgent activity in Pakistan by the lethal Haqqani network, a key Taliban ally, were failing.

The hints and feints the article offers about who leaked the memo provide ample entertainment for a Saturday afternoon.

Note the way the WaPo describes its sources inconsistently. It offers this quote from a senior defense official.

“The sanctuaries are a deal-killer for the [Afghan war] strategy,” said a senior defense official who is familiar with the ongoing debate and who, like several officials in this story, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal deliberations. [my emphasis]

But then the WaPo suggests military leaders have motive to leak the cable, distinguishing between “defense” and “military” officials.

The cable, which was described by several officials familiar with its contents, could be used as ammunition by senior military officials who favor more aggressive action by the United States against the Haqqani havens in Pakistan. It also could buttress calls from senior military officials for a more gradual withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan as the 2014 deadline for ending combat operations approaches.

These military officials have maintained for months that the strategy of targeting raids against Taliban leadership and building local Afghan governance is showing impressive results. [my emphasis]

Mind you, none of these military officials seem to be directly quoted here–at least not defined as military officials. The comment might just reflect the knowledge of Greg Jaffe, WaPo’s military writer. Though it would be consistent if a General or two leaked such a cable–after all, Stanley McChrystal is assumed to have leaked a similar cable during Obama’s Afghanistan review in 2009, for similar reason.

Yet I’m most interested in this quote, of someone whose affiliation was rather pointedly (given the description of defense and military sources) not identified.

“There’s no debate about the importance of going after Haqqani . . . and Taliban militants who launch attacks into Afghanistan,” one U.S. official said. “Support for this is universal.” [my emphasis]

The article also defaults to “US officials” elsewhere, though that could be because the sources came from multiple agencies. Note, “US official” can be used to refer to members of Congress, as well as agency officials.

In any case should we assume these unmarked sources are intelligence ones–the beat of Greg Miller, the WaPo’s intelligence writer and the other byline on the story?

Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @robertcaruso Nothing is sacred anymore
33mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Apparently @CNN thinks Donald Trump is a missing plane. Putting Steve King on to buck up Trump's racism is just sick https://t.co/d2QUJOPTDK
40mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @bsdtectr @B_Ribs @mtaibbi It would really round things out, wouldn't it?
44mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @JoshMalina: I respect Donald Trump for gradually cutting all ties to business as he pursues the Presidency.
46mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @AllThingsHLS You are on a roll tonight crime dog.
48mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @EdgeofSports No, don't think so. Also not sure I would trade the Russell and Randle future for Cousins either.
49mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Gia_Vang @findmikeandtina Thank you for the report! And I knew it was their wording+that drives me nuts because they're being disingenuous.
52mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz This would explain so much.... https://t.co/k4ZCLMZPsf
57mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Gia_Vang @ERIC_WATSON @findmikeandtina Now, maybe said person is not in legal custody, but is still being questioned.
59mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Gia_Vang @ERIC_WATSON @findmikeandtina You said custody If person is in legal custody then hes been arrested. Irrespective of what cops say
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Gia_Vang @ERIC_WATSON @findmikeandtina Um, if there is a person in custody, then there has been an arrest, no?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @JT__Orlando Kudos to Carrasco for the huge smile.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
July 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031