Unrestricted Warfare

Why So Surprised? CIA, U.S. Military Knew Chinese Hackers Expected Since 1999

Cover, Unrestricted Warfare via Wikimedia

Cover, Unrestricted Warfare via Wikimedia

The breathless reporting about the alleged Chinese hacking at The New York Times is truly annoying because of the shock it displays. The surprise any major government or private corporate entity shows at this point about any network-based security breach that appears to originate from China should be treated as propaganda, or a display of gross ignorance.

In 1999, the CIA’s Foreign Broadcast Information Service published a white paper entitled Unrestricted Warfare, written by the PRC’s Col. Qiao Liang and Col. Wang Xiansui. The publication outlined the methodologies a nation-state could deploy as part of an asymmetric war. Further, the same work outlined the U.S.’s weaknesses at that time were it to confront such asymmetric warfare. It did not focus any other nation-state, just the U.S.*

The colonels acknowledged that the U.S.—at the time of the paper—had considered using a range of tools in response to conflicts:

“…There’s no getting around the opinions of the Americans when it comes to discussing what means and methods will be used to fight future wars. This is not simply because the U.S. is the latest lord of the mountain in the world. It is more because the opinions of the Americans on this question really are superior compared to the prevailing opinions among the military people of other nations. The Americans have summed up the four main forms that warfighting will take in the future as: 1) Information warfare; 2) Precision warfare [see Endnote 8]; 3) Joint operations [see Endnote 9]; and 4) Military operations other than war (MOOTW) [see Endnote 10]. This last sentence is a mouthful. From this sentence alone we can see the highly imaginative, and yet highly practical, approach of the Americans, and we can also gain a sound understanding of the warfare of the future as seen through the eyes of the Americans. Aside from joint operations, which evolved from traditional cooperative operations and coordinated operations, and even Air- Land operations, the other three of the four forms of warfighting can all be considered products of new military thinking. General Gordon R. Sullivan, the former Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, maintained that information warfare will be the basic form of warfighting in future warfare. For this reason, he set up the best digitized force in the U.S. military, and in the world. Moreover, he proposed the concept of precision warfare, based on the perception that “there will be an overall swing towards information processing and stealthy long-range attacks as the main foundations of future warfare.” For the Americans, the advent of new, high-tech weaponry, such as precision-guided weapons, the Global Positioning System (GPS), C4I systems and stealth airplanes, will possibly allow soldiers to dispense with the nightmare of attrition warfare. …”

The rise of military tools like drones for precision-guided stealth attacks was predicted; quite honestly, the PRC’s current cyber warfare could be a pointed response to Gen. Sullivan’s statement about information warfare.

But in acknowledging the U.S.’s future use of MOOTW, the colonels also offered up the most likely approaches in an asymmetric assault or response: trade war, financial war, new terror war in contrast to traditional terror war, ecological war. Of these, they cited a specific example of new terror war entity and attacks: →']);" class="more-link">Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV .@AdamWeinstein That Rauf fellow sure gets around, doesn't he? https://t.co/UjM9fHPlyk
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @timstarks In any case, a really helpful list, if it serves as catalog of yet more non-answer answers. Thanks. @LarryAkey
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @timstarks No. But I think others did. Obviously Lynch's closest involvement w/215 directly would be FBI non-phone dragnet use @LarryAkey
30mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @timstarks Ah thanks. Wasn't complaining, but that (I think) is one folks missed non-phone dragnet app for. @LarryAkey
33mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Can just imagine 3rd time Balogna gets busted, only this time w/machine gun rather than pepper spray. "3rd time's a charm!" he might say.
35mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Q: Did Tony Balogna (serial protest abuser) ever get fired? Or will he, too, soon be wielding a machine gun? http://t.co/v2V4aXUpKV
36mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @laRosalind They should sue any anti-vaxxers who exposed them!
38mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @flexlibris Awesome! Great news!
39mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @timstarks Wasn't there one more discussion of 215? Was interesting bc it sounded like she was talking non-phone dragnet uses @LarryAkey
41mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @LarryAkey: .@timstarks on where AG nominee #LorettaLynch stands on several natl security issues - http://t.co/BWb1uEyX18
42mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Where IS Abdul Rauf Khadim and Whose Side IS He On? https://t.co/UjM9fHPlyk
48mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @LarryAkey: Military admits #GTMO forcefeeding against international law & violates medical ethics, @JasonLeopold reports - http://t.co/
50mreplyretweetfavorite
January 2015
S M T W T F S
« Dec    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031