women’s rights

Future Forecast: Ignoring Half the Picture Yields Surprisingly Poor Results

[adapted: Magic 8-Ball by Andres Rueda via Flickr]

[Adapted: Magic 8-Ball by Andres Rueda via Flickr]

It’s that time of year when we not only take a look backward, but a look forward to the future. Unfortunately in doing so, we rely heavily on so-called experts, whose vision suffers from two fundamental limitations:

  • They’re overwhelmingly male; their viewpoints are published more frequently than those of women;
  • They depend frequently on male-dominated science and technology in constructing their forecasts, rather than looking at shifts in human conditions.

Once a upon a time in my career, I rubbed shoulders with futurists, both in corporate visioning and in business intelligence. They made a few eye-opening predictions that I pooh-poohed at the time. In 1999 one futurist told me that fuel cell technology wouldn’t be commercialized for more than 10 or 15 years. Another report circa 2000 predicted the U.S. would become a rogue nation because of its hegemonic power.

I laughed off both of those forecasts at the time. You’ll note, however, none of our government’s unilaterally killing drones use fuel cells as power sources.

In spite of the occasional spot-on prediction, many of the forecasts I’ve read or seen made as part of scenario planning have not come to pass. They remain years and decades away if they haven’t already become impossible or irrelevant. Why are future outcomes so notoriously nebulous?

During the dozen-plus years since I first worked with futurists and participated in scenario planning sessions, I’ve wised up and learned a few things, key to understanding the lameness of most futurists’ forecasts.

1) It’s really difficult for most organizations to see outside their own self-constructed silos built on the expertise of their products and services. They hire and promote subject-matter experts and look to them for forecasts. Because of internal feedback loops, organizations become blind to barriers so that their members really can’t see with specificity beyond 2-5 years. Asking folks in formal organizations to make forecasts about their own work, even with well-trained facilitators, is extremely difficult. Barriers within their own organizations may be invisible to them as well, ex. internal politics, or other activities deliberately hidden from view.

2) Organizations are often blind to their own social capital. If members within groups are uniformly unchallenged by barriers within and without their business lives, they may not see bumps in the road that thwart everybody else outside their group.

3) Outsiders who speculate on future activities of organizations while relying on publicly available information from within these groups may suffer from the same siloed and blinkered vision.

4) Predictions tend to follow the quantifiable, where the money as well as expectation exist—in science and technology. Unfortunately, scientists are loathe to make guarantees; they give percentages and odds, but not absolute assurances. Forecasts are only as good as the current understanding of science and technology, within some margin of error. Futurists often round up, encouraging excessive optimism.

These factors may explain why futurists’ predictions may ignore realities that grip nearly half of the humans on earth, while rendering so many of their forecasts inert.

Even factoring in the biases that shape forecasts, the future imagined can be far too tidy, . The gritty truths of the human condition and all its volatility are too neatly removed, parceled off outside the field of speculation. Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @kirkmurphy I am consistent.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Seriously, this UK vote is serious, because Ann Coulter is registered to vote on the cravenly wrong side. Probably. #FairUseParody
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @kirkmurphy you KNEW I would say that about the Schloz, right??
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz I understand that "voter fraud expert" Bradley J. Schlozman, formerly, obviously, of Alvin and the Chipmunks, is disappointed in Scotland.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @bsdtectr VERY MUCH in relevant discussion. As is Deep Purple Live In Japan. Also, way up there is Bless It's Pointed Little Head by JA.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz If you disagree, use the "Yo App" to try to contact me. Cause, you know, I will be monitoring that. #OrNot
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz May be just me, but there may never have been two better live rock+roll albums than Rolling Stones Get Yer Ya Yas Out and J Geils Full House
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Kiki, wistfully pining away for her new best friend, @jilliancyork http://t.co/9cXhpQ4ku3
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @OKnox @emptywheel Quit guessing and man up you wimp!
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TorEkelandPC To me, battle should be abt 2nd Amendment right to bear drones and bear hacks.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @DougWilliams85: I'm just happy that my father never accepted that his only son would have to work twice as hard to deserve simple equal…
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @pwnallthethings: @csoghoian "On devices running IOS 8, your personal data is stored in our cloud, so law enforcement no longer needs to…
6hreplyretweetfavorite
September 2014
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930