TSP and FISA

Yup, still mono-focused on FISA, but mr. emptywheel is clamoring for dinner, so maybe once I step away from the computer, I’ll remember all the other things I’ve been meaning to write on.

I want to object to the way Kevin Drum is referring to the new details of FISA:

Originally, FISA allowed warrantless wiretapping of anycommunication between two foreigners. It also allowed warrantlesssurveillance of "foreign powers" (including those on U.S. soil) as longas there was no substantial likelihood that the surveillance wouldinclude conversations with U.S. persons. "Foreign powers" did notinclude terrorist groups.

Democrats and Republicans were both willing to amend FISA to allowlimited surveillance of terrorist groups, and both were willing toamend FISA to overcome technical problems that had made it difficult tomonitor certains kinds of foreign-to-foreign communications. So whatwas the disagreement? Originally I thought it was mainly about how tofix one of the technical problems: namely, given modern communicationsnetwork architecture, what procedures do you need to put in place toensure a high likelihood that U.S. persons won’t be surveilled while atthe same time allowing NSA the widest possible latitude to monitorgenuine foreign-to-foreign communications?

However, that appears not to be the case.  Rather, NSA (and the White House) were specifically looking for newauthority to monitor communications that included U.S. persons. And notjust communications related to terrorism. They wanted a free hand forwarrantless surveillance of any communication between foreigners andAmericans that was related to foreign intelligence in any way.

It’s not that Drum is, strictly speaking, wrong (though see AL’s cautions in the comments). But he’s setting a false, two-part comparison: Pre-Amendment FISA and Post-Amendment FISA, with the only thing that intervened as the Administration’s wishes to "modernize" FISA.

This comes, I think, out of the Administration’s head-fake, which consisted of naming a small part of the warrantless wireless program the "Terrorist Surveillance Program," which (when we entered into this most recent debate) the Administration claimed it wanted to legalize. Bush affirmed, on repeated occasions, that the "TSP" only consisted of taps that the Administration could ensure were targeted to those with ties to Al Qaeda. And it only consisted of taps for which one of the parties was outside of the country.

But we know the whole "TSP" thing was just a head-fake. While that is all Bush admitted to, we know there are several other aspects the warrantless wiretap program included. These are, at a minimum:

  1. The tapping of communication that the Administration can’t guarantee involves one party outside of the United States
  2. The tapping of communication for which the Al Qaeda tie is tenuous at best
  3. The use of data-mining to select the targets of interest
  4. The collection of the PEN data from a huge chunk of the communications passing through our country’s telecom networks

Drum suggests that the Administration wasn’t asking for 1 and 2–that those things just got thrown into the pot at the last minute. Well, perhaps not in so many words. But that is, in fact, the program the Administration was trying to make legal, so the mistake or confusion arises solely because we treated this debate as one strictly about modernization. Had we treated this debate as one about legalizing the Administration’s illegal program, including those aspects that Bush never admitted but we knew were included anyway, those two items would clearly have figured prominently on the list. (Though it’s unclear whether the Administration’s broad use of "Foreign Intelligence" to describe the target of the taps is designed solely to authorize tapping people whose ties to Al Qaeda are tenuous, or, more likely, whether they want to include intelligence of all stripes, presumably including international industrial intelligence.)

As to the last two, those are the elements that I suggest we really scrutinize this law for. AL suggests, in the comment linked above, that they may have, in fact, thrown in a thin legalization of the data-mining by treating that as surveillance that "concerns" foreign intelligence. Perhaps.

The point is, though, not to let Bush’s Orwellian TSP head-fake continue its power. It was never just about tapping Al Qaeda. Treating it as such simply buys the BushCo line about "TSP."

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to TSP and FISA

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @Popehat @adamsteinbaugh I maybe knew that, but that isn't me. Just looking for some creative ways to defend. Hell, theyve to be out there!
9mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Popehat @adamsteinbaugh You laugh, but this is a very nice teacher trying to help students, and neither she nor her dog did anything wrong.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @adamsteinbaugh No duty to not have dog there, in fact was approved program by the school over years that won awards.
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nigelduara Pats fan. After Packers and Cardinals, of course!
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @adamsteinbaugh ...the teacher/owner of the dog because the kid stumbled over it and fell. I think this is horseshit, but need some help.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @adamsteinbaugh No, kid was pretty much, by his own admission, running w/o looking+stumbled+fell over innocent dog. Parents fucking sue...
18mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @adamsteinbaugh Now she is being sued by the parents of some kid who negligently stumbled over the dog+hurt wrist in an enclosed playground.
20mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Owner is teacher who brought dog to school to help struggling kids have something to read to. Won awards over years. https://t.co/jJqaKw42y6
21mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Owner is award winning teacher, and incident happened on school grounds in enclosed area (i.e. not at large) https://t.co/BN1escm4R6
28mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Okay Legal Hive Mind: Need help as to defenses for innocent dog (and owner) tripped over in enclosed area by negligent kid w/greedy parents.
30mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Rex Ryan-shaped corn maze is pretty magical http://t.co/7F2aggRRqK or why the arrogant Jets+lowly Fish should shut up about winningAFCEast
46mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @NickKristof: My column on our nutty, sex-crazed Congress: Read and weep http://t.co/hvjXZwStEX http://t.co/8PeQlimvXD
1hreplyretweetfavorite
August 2007
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031