OLC Restores 4th Amendment after Hounding from Congress

 

In her post on Steven Bradbury’s October 6, 2008 OLC opinion withdrawing the October 23, 2001 OLC memo eviscerating the 4th Amendment, Christy asks some important questions.

In fact, it reads like a thinly veiled, but ever-so-politely worded, call of “bullshit.”

It’s laugh out loud funny.  Or would be if it weren’t for the fact that it took more than 7 years to issue it — during which time the government was still operating under the craptastic legal assumptions, one presumes.

Why was this kept hidden?

I’ve got a pretty good answer why Bradbury’s opinion was kept hidden.

In the exchange between DiFI and Michael Mukasey above–which took place on April 10, 2008–Mukasey equivocated, badly, about whether or not that October 23, 2001 opinion remained in force.

DiFi: Is this memo in force? That the Fourth Amendment does not apply in domestic military.

Mukasey: The principle that the Fourth Amendment does not apply in wartime is not in force.

DiFi: No. The principle that I asked you about? Does it apply to domestic military operations? Is the Fourth Amendment, today, applicable to domestic military operations?

Mukasey: [unclear] don’t know of domestic military operations being carried out today.

DiFi: I’m asking you a question. That’s not the answer. The question is, does it apply?

Mukasey: I’m unaware of any domestic military operations being carried out today.

[back and forth]

Mukasey:  The Fourth Amendment applies across the board regardless of whether we’re in wartime or in peacetime.

[snip]

Mukasey: In my understanding it is not operative.

Well, it turns out it took another six months for Bradbury to withdraw the opinion.

Given Mukasey’s equivocations, I’d say there’s a very good reason they hid the memo (and, by association, the evidence that it had not been withdrawn when Mukasey equivocated wildly). I’d also suggest that, Mukasey knew well of a domestic military operation–DOD’s NSA wiretapping Americans domestically–that was ongoing at the time. And which, until the passage of the FISA Amendment Act, may well have been relying on Yoo’s October 2001 memo for legal cover.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

82 Responses to OLC Restores 4th Amendment after Hounding from Congress

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV I'd say I'm boycotting #Indiana over the new law, but after I was there a couple of years ago, I swore I'd never go back to that shit hole.
30mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @KeithOlbermann: I don't care if Final 4 winds up being played in a parking lot in Tulsa, NCAA has no right to support legally codified …
36mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @KeithOlbermann: Simple fact: after Indiana enacts a law permitting prejudice against some of its customers, NCAA should pull Final 4 ou…
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Lockheed's had crazy week. Going fr earnings call expressing worry abt PEACE BREAKING OUT to the war in Yemen w/best customers USING planes
55mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @mitchellreports @digby56 Funny, because what I've learned over the years is that Leon Panetta is a liar
56mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @armandodkos Sen. Allen would make church mandatory. God help us. http://t.co/lClST0Er71
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @JustinWolfers: Dear IRS: Here are some Bitcoin bugs who owe you capital gains taxes. I'm sure @winklevoss wouldn't evade tax, right? ht…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @effraj so the wine was good?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @a_marshall_plan: !! MT @Walldo: Here is the redacted Stingray training manual obtained by @MatthewKeysLive http://t.co/G0SCptJjGe #FOIA
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DanMyer82366100 Yup. Also suggests that this may escalate very very quickly.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Welp, Putin seems to want to add Yemen to his shopping basket. Now all we need is to get South China Sea into the basket.
1hreplyretweetfavorite