OLC Restores 4th Amendment after Hounding from Congress

 

In her post on Steven Bradbury’s October 6, 2008 OLC opinion withdrawing the October 23, 2001 OLC memo eviscerating the 4th Amendment, Christy asks some important questions.

In fact, it reads like a thinly veiled, but ever-so-politely worded, call of “bullshit.”

It’s laugh out loud funny.  Or would be if it weren’t for the fact that it took more than 7 years to issue it — during which time the government was still operating under the craptastic legal assumptions, one presumes.

Why was this kept hidden?

I’ve got a pretty good answer why Bradbury’s opinion was kept hidden.

In the exchange between DiFI and Michael Mukasey above–which took place on April 10, 2008–Mukasey equivocated, badly, about whether or not that October 23, 2001 opinion remained in force.

DiFi: Is this memo in force? That the Fourth Amendment does not apply in domestic military.

Mukasey: The principle that the Fourth Amendment does not apply in wartime is not in force.

DiFi: No. The principle that I asked you about? Does it apply to domestic military operations? Is the Fourth Amendment, today, applicable to domestic military operations?

Mukasey: [unclear] don’t know of domestic military operations being carried out today.

DiFi: I’m asking you a question. That’s not the answer. The question is, does it apply?

Mukasey: I’m unaware of any domestic military operations being carried out today.

[back and forth]

Mukasey:  The Fourth Amendment applies across the board regardless of whether we’re in wartime or in peacetime.

[snip]

Mukasey: In my understanding it is not operative.

Well, it turns out it took another six months for Bradbury to withdraw the opinion.

Given Mukasey’s equivocations, I’d say there’s a very good reason they hid the memo (and, by association, the evidence that it had not been withdrawn when Mukasey equivocated wildly). I’d also suggest that, Mukasey knew well of a domestic military operation–DOD’s NSA wiretapping Americans domestically–that was ongoing at the time. And which, until the passage of the FISA Amendment Act, may well have been relying on Yoo’s October 2001 memo for legal cover.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

82 Responses to OLC Restores 4th Amendment after Hounding from Congress

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @ChadLivengood: Ballot initiative petitions OK'd for wolf hunting in #Michigan, in limbo for minimum wage http://t.co/EFWC8GaNVz
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz With Poncho, Custom Weather Alerts That Say When to Pack Umbrella http://t.co/bwNOOl0f3f Yeah, but is this a real poncho or a Sears Poncho?
9mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @BoothWilliam: UN says it had 3 "direct hits" from Israeli fire on 2 schools in 3 days.
15mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @KenRoth: #Iran reportedly detains Washington Post journalist Jason Rezaian and two other Americans. http://t.co/3WQ3pYu1Xx http://t.co/
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Correx: Wall Street forces its tenants to live with cockroaches, termites, and rodents. http://t.co/F1wSUnuNLM
50mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@ddayen confirms that, predictably, Wall Street slum landlords force their tenants to live with cockroaches. http://t.co/F1wSUnuNLM
51mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen "Any idiot who noticed" could tell...
52mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen Fact check: Didn't YOU warn that Wall Street had no experience at renting?
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @naureenshah On Rascoff's discussion of "luxury" of stings. http://t.co/gpDEjBW7d9
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel In a Nation Ravaged by Banksters, FBI Can’t Afford the “Luxury” of Frivolous Counterterrorism Stings http://t.co/gpDEjBW7d9
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Anybody in Aspen mention that every time we try to deny AQ a safe haven, we create more of them?
1hreplyretweetfavorite