Cables and Toobz, Again

Many of you who kept linking to the news on the cable cuts in CA’s South Bay were pointing in this direction. (h/t Susie)

This week in the San Francisco Bay Area, the fiber-optic cable network was purposely sliced at four distinct locations. Where a hacker cannot succeed, bolt cutters will do. Read more in The Wall Street Journal’s Digits blog. Once the cables were cut, Internet service was flaky for the region and completely out for 50,000 customers. On top of that, the landlines would not work and the cell-phone towers in the area went dead.  [snip] How much work would it take to find some choke points that you could cut for the purposes of disrupting data communications in an area? How would this affect the so-called smart grid? The peculiar nature of the four cuts around the Bay Area indicated to me that someone was mapping how they would affect the region, keeping in mind that by cutting the cable in key areas you might be able to take down half the country. If more cuts are made in the future, then someone is trying to reverse-engineer the network to find the most vulnerable points of disruption.

The MarketWatch article speculates that the intentional cuts were an attempt to map how to shut off parts of the system. But what it doesn’t question–but a lot of you already had–was whether these intentional cuts had anything to do with the cable cuts made in the Middle East last year, which took down Egypt and Pakistan, and much of the rest of the Middle East.

We know whoever cut the cables last year (intentionally or not or some combination thereof) demonstrated clear choke points in international internet traffic. Now is someone trying to do the same within the US?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

31 Responses to Cables and Toobz, Again

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @Mansfield2016: Bolden is a former general cousnel for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund; and then there's Stivers: https://…
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Is there an official definition of a Caliphate? Cause Olsen seems to think he knows one when he sees one. Wouldn't that be a "state"?
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Olsen: "NCTC, we see the results of that collection without knowing where it came from." On Section 215. Interesting.
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Mueller having been caught in a lie, Olsen moves the ball and says we just have to share as much info.
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Good job by Isikoff on calling out Mueller's lie about the "gap" that needed to be filled by Section 215.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel If I were asking these questions I'd ask what happened at Mueller's May 2004 meeting at Cheney's office and at his request. Never explained.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Isikoff: DId you have any concerns ethically [about torture]? Mueller: [cuts him off] You have my answer.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MiekeEoyang He missed the entire Benghazi industry? @Isikoff
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Ali_Gharib This is you announcing your book on all the lies Israel has gotten away with? I expect to read it in 2024, then?
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nickmartin Then again, McCain will say anything to get his name in the news and appear to be relevant.
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MikeScarcella But OPR and David Margolis just couldn't find any sanctionable behavior. Funny how that is.
18mreplyretweetfavorite