Cables and Toobz, Again

Many of you who kept linking to the news on the cable cuts in CA’s South Bay were pointing in this direction. (h/t Susie)

This week in the San Francisco Bay Area, the fiber-optic cable network was purposely sliced at four distinct locations. Where a hacker cannot succeed, bolt cutters will do. Read more in The Wall Street Journal’s Digits blog. Once the cables were cut, Internet service was flaky for the region and completely out for 50,000 customers. On top of that, the landlines would not work and the cell-phone towers in the area went dead.  [snip] How much work would it take to find some choke points that you could cut for the purposes of disrupting data communications in an area? How would this affect the so-called smart grid? The peculiar nature of the four cuts around the Bay Area indicated to me that someone was mapping how they would affect the region, keeping in mind that by cutting the cable in key areas you might be able to take down half the country. If more cuts are made in the future, then someone is trying to reverse-engineer the network to find the most vulnerable points of disruption.

The MarketWatch article speculates that the intentional cuts were an attempt to map how to shut off parts of the system. But what it doesn’t question–but a lot of you already had–was whether these intentional cuts had anything to do with the cable cuts made in the Middle East last year, which took down Egypt and Pakistan, and much of the rest of the Middle East.

We know whoever cut the cables last year (intentionally or not or some combination thereof) demonstrated clear choke points in international internet traffic. Now is someone trying to do the same within the US?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

31 Responses to Cables and Toobz, Again

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @NaomiGilens: My paper on warrant canaries, posted in light of Apple apparently killing its Section 215 canary: http://t.co/u7By6hmJk4
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @PatrickCToomey Good paper but frustrating to see claim 215 only used for telecom. First confirmed for TATP precursors. @NaomiGilens
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @RobertsDan: Barbara Mikulski, who blocked Paul's call for separate Syrian vote, is effectively filibustering on Senate floor now - talk…
59mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel We interrupt forever war to bring you Orioles RT @KenGude: war debates happen all the time but the O’s haven’t won the AL East since ’97!!!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 False: New editor at Politico. You just don't know her.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Barb Mikulski interrupts ISIS war debate ('no way to minimize debate" she says) to talk abt Orioles, wearing bright orange jacket.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @HanniFakhoury Curious whether Apple decided to do that before or after Riley.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Hey, one of NFL's accused wife and/or child beaters is NOT getting a paid vacation on Exempt List. https://t.co/JTOzShg6CX
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @docexblog Ah, thanks. Should have cc'ed you on that question. Now I'm utterly fascinated by play of 9/17 date: Constitution & 9/17/01 MON.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @docexblog: @emptywheel @saftergood Under Act CIG became CIA day after Forrestal sworn in (which was Sept. 17), in Doc 1 here http://t.c…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel CIA website dates founding of CIA to signing of National Security Act, which was July 26, 1947. Why is today its birthday? @saftergood
1hreplyretweetfavorite