Cables and Toobz, Again

Many of you who kept linking to the news on the cable cuts in CA’s South Bay were pointing in this direction. (h/t Susie)

This week in the San Francisco Bay Area, the fiber-optic cable network was purposely sliced at four distinct locations. Where a hacker cannot succeed, bolt cutters will do. Read more in The Wall Street Journal’s Digits blog. Once the cables were cut, Internet service was flaky for the region and completely out for 50,000 customers. On top of that, the landlines would not work and the cell-phone towers in the area went dead.  [snip] How much work would it take to find some choke points that you could cut for the purposes of disrupting data communications in an area? How would this affect the so-called smart grid? The peculiar nature of the four cuts around the Bay Area indicated to me that someone was mapping how they would affect the region, keeping in mind that by cutting the cable in key areas you might be able to take down half the country. If more cuts are made in the future, then someone is trying to reverse-engineer the network to find the most vulnerable points of disruption.

The MarketWatch article speculates that the intentional cuts were an attempt to map how to shut off parts of the system. But what it doesn’t question–but a lot of you already had–was whether these intentional cuts had anything to do with the cable cuts made in the Middle East last year, which took down Egypt and Pakistan, and much of the rest of the Middle East.

We know whoever cut the cables last year (intentionally or not or some combination thereof) demonstrated clear choke points in international internet traffic. Now is someone trying to do the same within the US?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

31 Responses to Cables and Toobz, Again

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @LauraClawson If he did what we assume he did does Indiv A have the right to his or her privacy given the extortion?
1mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Cool! The periscope works. http://t.co/7LAHYao2C3
8mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Cool! The periscope works. http://t.co/87LcCZjtXw
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @billmon1 Not given the other rumors out there, no.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Misconduct against Indiv A happened "years earlier" when Hastert and A discussed it in 2010. Hastert was teacher/coach until 1981.
15mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Okay. Time far a 'Mericun sub now. http://t.co/xTm9LzUJTu
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @bungdan There have been questions raised during past scandals.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Walshman23 High school teacher and coach. Both of which indictment mentions.
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @bungdan Yes, and there have been past allegations abt Hastert that would be rather alarming for a coach, which indictment mentions.
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Median income in Yorkville is $83,059. Indiv A was making 5 times that from his or her Hastert bribes.
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @georgemaschke Already mentioned that.
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel There are 17,000 people in Yorkville, IL. Indiv A is one. Indiv A's $450K/year income from Hastert presumably makes Indiv A stick out there.
25mreplyretweetfavorite