Silvestre Reyes Announces Investigation into Violations of National Security Act

Reyes announces:

After careful consideration and consultation with the Ranking Minority Member and other members of the Committee, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence will conduct an investigation into possible violations of federal law, including the National Security Act of 1947.

This investigation will focus on the core issue of how the congressional intelligence committees and Congress are kept fully and currently informed. To this end, the investigation will examine several issues, including the program discussed during Director Panetta’s June 24th notification and whether there was any past decision or direction to withhold information from the Committee. 

Three points about this.

First, Reyes says he consulted with Crazy Pete Hoekstra. I look forward to seeing how Crazy Pete spins this.

That’ll be particularly interesting given the scope here. The investigation will include the reported assassination squad. But the core issue is more general–how CIA informs Congress. Which means that, in fact, this should also include whether or not CIA fullly briefed Pelosi and Goss on torture back in 2002.

Finally, the investigation will examine whether there was any "direction" to withhold information from Congress. I do hope they look at the question generally, as well as in the context of the reported assassination squad, because I suspect we’d see a pattern of Cheney instructing the Counterterrorism folks to lie to or withhold information from Congress.

Update: Reyes (and Jan Schakowsky) also announced the appointment of Adam Lurie, formerly an AUSA in NJ’s USA office, as staff director for the Investigations Subcommittee (which Schakowsky Chairs). He’ll be the lead staffer in this investigation.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to Silvestre Reyes Announces Investigation into Violations of National Security Act

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel Think I won the cancelled plane flight sweepstakes tonight. But don't ask me again tomorrow at 4AM.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel How did Zuley get from the Chicago precinct house to the interrogation booths at Guantnamo? http://t.co/g3Ug2jfjqv
41mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jaketapper You see my distinction though? That's not necessarily agreement with Bibi's claims.
43mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jaketapper Did you ask whether they think Iran will get nukes under it or is it just not enough flesh? @netanyahu
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @harviej Well, all on phone, serially (skipped standing in line and therefore appear to have succeeded). Except for cab ride home.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel LOL RT @flexlibris: @normative pedante
3hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @GatorZoneScott: A Sweep & Leap — #Gators OF Buddy Reed after today’s win. Shot from @TimCaseyPhoto... http://t.co/dIxUfcwqlx
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TedLott If only it didn't take storms in Dallas and NYC and 3 hours on the phone to get it same price when there are empty seats.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TedLott Oh shit. Did I say that out loud? Please don't tell anyone in GR? Those are my puny seats direct.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @astepanovich Just a teeny tiny corner. But the phone dragnet? Perhaps.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @astepanovich Thank you. I am not exaggerating when I say I've read them all.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @astepanovich Each docket is one number for all providers. All secondaries have same docket number.
3hreplyretweetfavorite