NYT, Republican Opposition Rag

Clark Hoyt has a really curious final column summarizing his three years as the NYT’s public editor. A lot of it is self-congratulation to the NYT for even having a public editor. But I’m most fascinated by Hoyt’s rebuttal of reader claims that NYT is a “liberal rag.”

For all of my three years, I heard versions of Kevin Keller’s accusation: The Times is a “liberal rag,” pursuing a partisan agenda in its news columns.

[snip]

But if The Times were really the Fox News of the left, how could you explain the investigative reporting that brought down Eliot Spitzer, New York’s Democratic governor;derailed the election campaign of his Democratic successor, David Paterson; got Charles Rangel, the Harlem Democrat who was chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, in ethics trouble; and exposed the falsehoods that Attorney General Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, another Democrat, was telling about his service record in the Vietnam era?

Hoyt names the Spitzer scandal, certain Paterson allegations, coverage of the Rangel scandal, and its recent Blumenthal attack as proof that the NYT is not a liberal rag.

With the exception of the Rangel coverage, these are all stories for which the source of the story is as much the issue as the story itself. Hoyt must hope we forget, for example, that Linda McMahon (Blumenthal’s opponent) boasted she fed the Blumenthal story to the NYT. Their denials that she had done so became even more unconvincing when the AP reported that the NYT hadn’t posted the full video, which undermined the NYT story.

I have no idea where the Rangel story came from (and in this case, I don’t care, because it’s clearly an important story about real abuse of power).

Then there’s Paterson. With this story, too, there’s a dispute about the NYT’s sources. Paterson says he was the NYT’s original source (they deny that too, and it’s true that this one is more likely to have been a Cuomo hit job). In any case, the NYT story fell far short of the bombshell that was promised for weeks leading up to it. Another political hit job that maybe wasn’t the story it was made out to be.

Which brings us to Eliot Spitzer. There are a number of possible sources the NYT might have relied on, starting with right wing ratfucker Roger Stone, who has bragged about being involved in that take-down. But they all, almost by definition, come down to leaks from inside a politicized DOJ. And those leaks focused not on any of the other elite Johns involved, not on the prostitution ring itself (which was, after all, exceptional only for its price tag), but on Spitzer. While I agree that Spitzer’s hypocrisy invited such a take-down, there wasn’t much legal news there, no matter how hard the press tried to invent it to justify the coverage.

But the list doesn’t end there. Elsewhere in Hoyt’s goodbye, he mentions his biggest regret–the Vicki Iseman story.

But throughout my tenure, Keller was gracious and supportive. When we had what was certainly our disagreement of greatest consequence — over the Times article suggesting that John McCain had had an extramarital affair with a young female lobbyist — Keller showed great equanimity. I said The Times had been off base. Though the story gave ammunition to critics who said the paper was biased, and it was no help to have the public editor joining thousands of readers questioning his judgment about it, Keller said mildly that we would just have to disagree on this one.

Say what you will about whether this was a worthwhile story, one with the wrong emphasis, or inappropriate scandal-mongering, it is pretty clear the Iseman part of the story came from disgruntled former Republican aides to McCain, probably in the neighborhood of John Weaver. Thus, it fits into this larger list of stories that serve not so much as proof of NYT fair-mindedness, but of its willingness to regurgitate oppo research in the service of powerful–often Republican–political opponents.

Then, finally, there’s the story that Hoyt doesn’t mention, to his significant discredit–the ACORN Pimp Hoax. As BradBlog has relentlessly documented, the NYT not only reported James O’Keefe’s doctored lies as fact, but Clark Hoyt himself scolded the paper for not being more responsive to such tripe. It took six months for the NYT to actually fact check the work of a transparent political propagandist and acknowledge that that propaganda presented a false picture–and they did so with little remorse at the damage they did in the interim.

Clark Hoyt’s valedictory defense of the NYT’s political balance ends up reading like a laundry list of the number of times the paper has served as a willing mouthpiece for largely GOP oppo research. Given the NYT’s history with Judy Miller, this is not a shock. But it is a pity that a once-respectable journalist like Hoyt now clings to NYT’s credulous recycling of political hit jobs as proof of the paper’s balance.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

28 Responses to NYT, Republican Opposition Rag

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz Trump is not an aberration, Trump is the resultant epitome of decades of "conservative" politics. Look in the mirror GOP, you ARE Trump.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I can just see Barbara yelling at each of her men telling them to get to the nearest camera to scorn that man Trump who showed no respect.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Why are people pretending the Bushes are being principled in refusing to back Trump? Trump damaged their already crappy brand, is all.
5mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz In fact, GOP/"conservative" ethos+playbook of delegitimization goes back to Carter+then Clinton. Reaping what sown. https://t.co/t9Gy7qREcr
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @KenGude: Added wrinkle to Trump-Ryan battle is that Ryan has an anti-trade, anti-immigration challenger in 8/9 primary: https://t.co/Ek
7mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Thoughtful take by @OrinKerr on the rise of Trumpism, but the GOP ethos of "delegitimization" started earlier. FAR https://t.co/LgZ355ErqQ
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @LOLGOP I certainly can't imagine I'm Cheney w/o copious amounts of alcohol. I know that.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @LOLGOP By "you," I assume you mean, "pour yourself several stiff drinks and pretend you're PapaDick and spawned BabyDick Cheney"?
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @LOLGOP Apparently Cheney doesn't much mind that Trump blamed his former "boss" for letting 9/11 happen and botching Iraq.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ggreenwald From that i can only assume he just leaked MORE code word docs to someone he's illicitly fucking @JohnKiriakou @MonaHol @Snowden
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ggreenwald Remember he bitched abt @JohnKiriakou the same week he lied to FBI abt leaking to mistress. @MonaHol @Snowden
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JC_Christian When does Hillary release the library of Trump Whitey coke tapes? Cause that's all I'm looking forward to at this point.
58mreplyretweetfavorite
June 2010
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930