Ill-Considered Trash Talk McChrystal’s Idea of Winning Hearts and Minds

Politico reports that Stanley McChrystal saw today’s big Rolling Stone article before it was published but didn’t object to anything in it (and the Hill reports there was even more devastating trash talk that was off the record).

Rolling Stone’s executive editor on Tuesday said that Gen. Stanley McChrystal did not raise any objections to a new article that repeatedly quotes him criticizing the administration.

Eric Bates, the magazine’s editor, said during an interview on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that McChrystal saw the piece prior to its publication as part of Rolling Stone’s standard fact-checking process – and that the general did not object to or dispute any of the reporting.

Asked if McChrystal pushed back on the story, Bates responded: “No, absolutely not.

Now, given the use of the pronoun “they” in the follow-on quotes, I’m assuming by “McChrystal” Bates means “McChrystal’s office,” which may well mean only that press aide that McChrystal already fired reviewed the article.

Nevertheless, this article was not–should not have been–a surprise. McChrystal’s team was at least okay with all this trash talk being published, if not intended for it to be published.

So take a step back and think about what that means for McChrystal (and should mean for the question of whether or not he gets fired for this). Stanley McChrystal, the guy in charge of winning hearts and minds in Afghanistan, okayed this article, presumably intending it to win hearts and minds in the US.

And McChrystal presumably knows US culture better than he knows Afghanistan culture.

This article is McChrystal’s idea of winning hearts and minds.

Argue what you will about whether McChrystal’s insubordination requires his firing. Argue what you will about his unique qualifications for the job.

But if this is McChrystal’s idea of how to win hearts and minds then we will never achieve success in Afghanistan so long as he’s in charge.

(Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Update: Rolling Stone tempers that somewhat. Though note the Hill piece and CNN pieces linked include similar, though weaker, claims.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

93 Responses to Ill-Considered Trash Talk McChrystal’s Idea of Winning Hearts and Minds

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @RebekahLSanders @michaelbkiefer @SenJohnMcCain So, that was actually how Ryan envisions it should go then? It's one or the other Charles.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @ryangrim: Good thing nobody overreacted MT @ibnezra Israeli police tell BBC men who killed 3 Israeli teens were lone cell, not operatin…
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JimWhiteGNV @TheAlligator Right behind Phoenix's Pizzarea Bianco!
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Munashik: My first piece for Huffpost! For Palestinians, There Is No Leaving on a Jet Plane http://t.co/52ALxgKfUO via @theworldpost
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @lawfareblog: Susan Landau: "On NSA's Subversion of NIST's Algorithm" http://t.co/3qXA0KhQNC
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ThePlumLineGS Interesting for social discussion, sure; relevant as actual evidence, nope.
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ThePlumLineGS No. It is hard to see how either instance is competent evidence, unless offered as rebuttal were Gruber or architect on stand
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Look. Congress actually did something people might like. http://t.co/pTiwa449uO And over there--porcine blimps in the sky!
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @dispositive Surely Vanee can't be tired of making completely non-credible denials over and over? @brianwez @jmhattem
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sarahjeong Have you suggested you'll eat their dog if they don't stop?
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @MazMHussain: Incredibly hypocritical statement from @saudiembassyUK (https://t.co/WASbEUT4ql) in light of this a few weeks ago: https:/…
31mreplyretweetfavorite
June 2010
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930