Putting “Really Mushy” Functions in a Department that Refuses to Be Audited

Noah Shachtman points to NextGov’s unsuccessful attempt to define how much DOD plans to spend on cybersecurity next year. DOD or its components have offered three different versions:

  • DOD’s mid-February report it would spend $2.3 billion
  • Air Force’s mid-February report it, by itself, would spend $4.6 billion
  • DOD’s March 23 revised report it would spend $3.2 billion

Part of the problem, as Shachtman explains in the NextGov piece, is that the definition of what counts as cybersecurity is not yet well defined.

“All of this stuff is still really mushy,” Shachtman said. Further obscuring visibility into the budget is the fact that some cybersecurity funding is classified at Defense components such as the NSA. Meanwhile, Cyber Command presents a new spending variable, he noted.

“Exactly where the NSA ends and the Cyber Command ends is a very open question,” Shachtman said. “How the Cyber Command is supposed to interact with the services is still being worked out.” He predicted it will take years to untangle the process of budgeting for federal computer security.

While you’re trying to get your head around how the Air Force has a bigger budget than the whole DOD for cybersecurity, remember a couple of things.

First, both the Air Force and DOD generally have stated policies of not telling Congress about Special Access Programs (in the case of Air Force) or clandestine cyberops. So to the extent that this mushy budget is mixed in with cyberops (as distinct from cybersecurity), there’s a decent chance Congress isn’t seeing all of it.

But even if Congress decided to look, to the extent that NSA (or CyberCommand, which General Keith Alexander also commands) has a hand in it, Congress is almost guaranteed to be unable to track it closely. That’s because NSA books can’t be audited and apparently NSA doesn’t intend to fix those problems.

Now all of would be pretty funny except that, insofar as the government can’t distinguish between legitimate cybersecurity (you know, preventing hackers and leakers from using thumb drives to upload malware and download entire databases) and cyberwar financially, there’s a decent chance they can’t do so organizationally either.

Or to put it in more tangible terms, HB Gary’s past governmental work has been about cybersecurity–assessing malware and finding intrusions. But they’ve been proposing collecting information about citizens’ First Amendment activity to use to target those citizens. And the Air Force–that entity with a cybersecurity budget bigger than all of DOD’s cybersecurity budget–is the service that was engaging cybersecurity firms to develop persona management software.

But aside from that, why should we be worried that such dangerous entities are organizationally such a clusterfuck?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to Putting “Really Mushy” Functions in a Department that Refuses to Be Audited

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @djsziff Woof!
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Reillax @Popehat @adamsteinbaugh Was initially submitted as a "notice of claim" to school dist in 2014. Denied. Now want teacher personally
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Reillax @adamsteinbaugh Ha! I have been actually trying to figure out that path, but see absolutely nuthin.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Holy crap, I so love the internet. https://t.co/CoJHeU2Z04
37mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@djsziff No, think unlikely. Which is not to say that the dog is not a hell of a lot brighter and more competent than AZ authorities.
49mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Um, can the internet outrage machine please make up their mind about the sexual identity and live/dead status of Jericho? #ComeOnBuffoons
50mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @goldietaylor: Boycott Stone Mountain Park, not the city.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @goldietaylor: I can guarantee you those flag protesters don't live in Stone Mountain.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @adamsteinbaugh Oh, I can get it, I am just starting, ad a little frustrated with the itinerancy of the plaintiffs' counsel so far. Total BS
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @TBTimes_Rays Dumping Jepsen to call up Yates strikes me as worst #Rays move of the season.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Reillax @Popehat @adamsteinbaugh FYI, subject school dist was served w/notice of claim, but neither they nor Plaintiffs will cough it up.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Reillax @Popehat @adamsteinbaugh No waiver. Indemnification unclear b/c of §10 of this statute re: "owner" http://t.co/BE6V2Mt5l1
1hreplyretweetfavorite