One Way to Make Sending Frank Wisner to “Negotiate” with Mubarak Look Smart

CNN is reporting that Curt Weldon, the ethically and legally challenged former Congressman with ties to Manucher Ghorbanifar, has gone to Libya to try to negotiate with Muammar Qaddafi. In a NYT op-ed, Weldon makes the case for why he’s the guy to persuade Qaddafi to step aside.

Seven years later I am back in Libya, this time on a much different mission, as the leader of a small private delegation, at the invitation of Colonel Qaddafi‘s chief of staff and with the knowledge of the Obama administration and members of Congress from both parties. Our purpose is to meet with Colonel Qaddafi today and persuade him to step aside.

[snip]

First, we must engage face-to-face with Colonel Qaddafi and persuade him to leave, as my delegation hopes to do. I’ve met him enough times to know that it will be very hard to simply bomb him into submission.

Simultaneously, we must obtain an immediate United Nations-monitored cease-fire, with the Libyan Army withdrawing from contested cities and rebel forces ending attempts to advance.

Then we must identify and engage with those leaders who, if not perfect, are pragmatic and reform-minded and thus best positioned to lead the country.

[snip]

The world agrees that Colonel Qaddafi must go, even though no one has a plan, a foundation for civil society has not been constructed and we are not even sure whom we should trust. But in the meantime, the people of Libya deserve more than bombs. [my emphasis]

Noah Shachtman elaborates on the history Weldon and Qaddafi have in common. The short version? At a time when Weldon served on Qaddafi’s “foundation,” he was pitching selling arms to him.

It wasn’t long ago — April, 2008, to be exact — that Weldon was boasting in a report that he had become the “1st non-Libyan Board Member of the Ghadaffi Foundation.” During a trip to Tripoli the month before, the self-proclaimed “friend of Libya” carried “a personal letter from Libyan Chamber [of Commerce] President to U.S. Chamber President.” Weldon also visited with with the country’s “Nuclear Ministry Leadership and agreed to reinforce U.S. nuclear cooperation/collaboration.”

Finally, Weldon agreed “to quickly return to Libya for meetings with [Gadhafi’s] son Morti regarding defense and security cooperation.”

Two weeks later, Defense Solutions — a company which, at the time, counted Weldon as a key executive and adviser — drew up a proposal to refurbish the country’s fleet of armored vehicles, including its T-72 tanks, BMP-1 infantry fighting vehicles and BTR-60 armored personnel carriers.

Now, granted, Weldon says he is undertaking this trip with the knowledge–not the endorsement–of the Obama Administration. Still, I can’t help but wondering whether this is an elaborate plot (with Weldon, there’s always a plot) to make Obama’s decision to send Frank Wisner–also a business associate–to negotiate with Hosni Mubarak look remarkably smart by comparison. After all, both Wisner and Weldon have troubling conflicts that make them poor choices to represent our country’s interests. But Wisner, at least, is diplomatic and sane. Weldon? I’m not so sure.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to One Way to Make Sending Frank Wisner to “Negotiate” with Mubarak Look Smart

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @joanwalsh -urg!
23mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Popehat: .@nycjim May you require a patient, careful doctor with a flashlight to retrieve your scare quotes.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @april_anita Hmm. Well, admittedly, spouse didn't get roped into kilt for the wedding in inland Brazil. So I get your point.
51mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Pamela Geller, Breitbarters+their little show in Dallas are all loathsome. But their free speech gets protected too; stop the schadenfreude.
51mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @april_anita That said, the one we went to in Glasgow (where it's not a small market, it's a rite of passage) was a kick.
52mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @april_anita As someone whose Irish spouse gets roped into wearing them at Scottish weddings they're necessary for out-of-towners w/o tartan
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ErrataRob To be fair, Tea Party, as a term, is & for most of its history has been a floating signifier. Can mean anything @RepThomasMassie
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @peterdaou: Want to see what anti-Hillary misogyny looks like in its rawest form? http://t.co/XDrE3DZ2C5
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @armandodkos @kdrum Seconded. But the updates at MoJo sure seem positive. For that I am relieved.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@RepThomasMassie: "An ideologue reads the bill, every word, period & section; a partisan reads whip recommendation." http://t.co/2PuBGWnZtg
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @somejustguy Like Netflix cheap seats?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @somejustguy You're only ruining Avengers for spouse if I tell him.
1hreplyretweetfavorite