Still More Deficit Reduction and “Department of Competitiveness”?!?!?

Calculated Risk says most of what needs to be said about this article describing the debate within the White House over whether or not to “pivot to jobs” after all.

Tax incentives are the “bigger idea“? It sounds like the debate is between doing nothing and doing very little.

But it’s worth looking at two parts of this argument that appear to be new.

The article reports the Administration is considering proposing great economic policies that it would deliver in a second term. And those ideas? More neoliberal policies that won’t actually create jobs.

The issue is being framed by the 2012 election. Administration officials, frustrated by the intransigence of House Republicans, have increasingly concluded that the best thing Mr. Obama can do for the economy may be winning a second term, with a mandate to advance his ideas on deficit reduction, entitlement changes, housing policy and other issues.

So the side currently winning this debate is not only arguing against a pivot to jobs right now, but arguing it should continue its obsessive focus on the deficit and “entitlement” cuts through a second term.

And housing policy?!?!? This Administration wants to run on a promise to implement more housing policy, an area in which it has thus far achieved unmitigated failure?

But way at the end of the article, there is what I believe is a completely new policy, one which betrays just how misguided this Administration’s economic policy has become. The new big idea? Renaming the Department of Commerce.

The administration may also merge the Department of Commerce, the Office of the United States Trade Representative and some economic divisions at the State Department into a new agency, administration officials said. Possible names include the Department of Jobs or the Department of Competitiveness.

As bad as the suggestion that simply rearranging the Titanic’s deck chairs might be a great new idea is, the underlying implications of this proposed policy change are worse. Someone on Obama’s team thinks that by merging the entity that negotiates deals to send our jobs overseas with the Department of Commerce and those parts of the State Department that serve the interests of Monsanto rather than the American people, you’ll end up with more Jobs or better Competitiveness.

Atrios is right. We’re doomed.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

12 Responses to Still More Deficit Reduction and “Department of Competitiveness”?!?!?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @matthewstoller This is related, but not the study I was thinking of. http://t.co/6PwJyWQCTW @ScottPaulAAM
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @matthewstoller But there are really interesting DOD sources who'll talk abt how we're losing underlying mfg tech. @ScottPaulAAM has links
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @matthewstoller But what I'm suggesting is making war toys has become our industrial policy. They think that's enough: it is to launder $$
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @matthewstoller Wouldn't say I have supply chain expertise. Just have hung out with those who do. And live in area that still manufactures.
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @matthewstoller Think you need to factor in the one mfg sector we still largely have, which is war toys. (Tho losing parts of that too)
13mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @seanpaulkelley: Anti-vax retards. http://t.co/QVhyo9PJAt Here's a flow chart to help you make your decision. Unreal, it's 2015. http://…
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @laRosalind @JasonLeopold "we thought of you as we rocked out." But not much, amiright??
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @matthewstoller: (13) And it takes years to build up that capacity. So unless you can do w/out medicine for three years, you are depende…
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @GarethPorter I had thought Lybia, Syria might fit, but @davidcnswanson persuaded me. @senorchompers @normansolomon
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @peachuniverse Which school? That's sort of why I'm defending (eek!) Williams over Yale. @AaronBlakeWP
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Because Hayden depicts himself as the cautious one?
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jimpoco Strikes me as story someone agreed to sit on until CIA gave "But this outlet is publishing" @onekade @adamgoldmanwp @SpyTalker
30mreplyretweetfavorite
August 2011
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031