Congress and the Administration Agree: the Government Can Indefinitely Detain US Citizens

I’ve got a long post mostly written on the debate between two awful positions on the detainee provisions in the Defense Authorization.

But let me make something clear. Both sides have already bought off on one principle: that the Administration can indefinitely detain US citizens.

Dianne Feinstein made this clear in her comments yesterday in the Senate (in which she was reading from a letter SJC and SSCI Democrats wrote).

Section 1031 needs to be reviewed to consider whether it is consistent with the September 18, 2001, authorization for use of military force, especially because it would authorize the indefinite detention of American citizens without charge or trial …..

And yet while in the rest of her speech, DiFi laid out problems she had with sections 1032 (mandating military detention in most cases), 1033 (requiring certification before DOD transfers detainees to a third country), and 1035 (giving DOD precedence in detainee decisions), she made not a peep objecting to (as opposed to raising cautions about) this ability to indefinitely detain American citizens.

In response to DiFi’s speech and the Administration’s veto threat, Carl Levin revealed that the Administration’s complaints about the language authorizing military detention don’t stem from any squeamishness about indefinitely detaining Americans. Indeed, as Levin made clear, the Administration asked that limitations on applying the section to Americans be taken out of the bill.

The committee accepted all of the Administration’s proposed changes to section 1031.  As the Administration has acknowledged, the provision does nothing more than codify existing law.  Indeed, as revised pursuant to Administration recommendations, the provision expressly “affirms” an authority that already exists.  The Supreme Court held in the Hamdi case that existing law authorizes the detention of American citizens under the law of war in the limited circumstances spelled out here, so this is nothing new.

The initial bill reported by the committee included language expressly precluding “the detention of citizens or lawful resident aliens of the United States on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States.”  The Administration asked that this language be removed from the bill. [my emphasis]

And given that SASC already voted to support this section by significant margins, it appears clear it has plenty of support.

So make no mistake. As I’ll show in my longer post, there are clear differences between the two sides (though I find both sides problematic). But whether or not the government can indefinitely detain Americans is not one of them.

Update: I took out “militarily,” as 1032 exempts automatic military detention for US citizens.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

14 Responses to Congress and the Administration Agree: the Government Can Indefinitely Detain US Citizens

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @B_Meson Let me check my sched. Also I eat other things besides goat! Even lovely veggies! @jujueyeball
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Hydra_Cook Nice thing abt being a rich man--presumed Asian gangster or honest businessman--is you can pay for good legal representation.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mattfwood Sure, all I'm saying is Commerce gets involved in carrot-and-sticking companies to cooperate @biasedreporter @freepress
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Anyone besides me think the Phua case (Caesar's illegal entry) has some spectacular parallel construction behind it? http://t.co/pOa5ytZElH
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @daveweigel Sure. But they have that nice river park. Plus when you live in place w/seasons it becomes where you live.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @freepress It'll prolly make it easer for the govt to spy on you. @mattfwood
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @daveweigel You have a really crummy approach to seasons! "Junk weather?!?!"
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade You guys!! Get a room! Or a condo. @flexlibris
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @ggreenwald: Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak: Edward Snowden is 'a hero to me' https://t.co/Krx03s1vjF (via @dangillmor)
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Courtartist: Trying my hand at cartooning: #SCOTUS takes "One-Person, One-Vote" case, Evenwel v. Abbott. http://t.co/esxeY7bFzo
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @manish_vij @benwizner And, yet, by same idiot theory saying all Clinton correlations are CORRUPTION!, Sanders guilty http://t.co/jKBNhIwLDm
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @EdMasley @GrantWoods @azcentral And, yet, there is not a Marshall amp or Stratocaster in sight. Did you ask about that??
4hreplyretweetfavorite
November 2011
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930