No, the Iraq War Is NOT Over

The NYT, which played a key propaganda role in getting us into the Iraq war, has a 1000-word article telling us the Iraq war has officially been declared over.

And while it is true that the Administration had a campaign event dog and pony show yesterday declaring the war over, it is not.

After all, Rand Paul tried to formally, legally end the Iraq war last month. And 67 Senators refused to do so.

The fact that the Iraq AUMF remains on the books matters. It matters because no matter how many times we wax eloquent about Iraqis controlling their own destiny, Nuri al-Maliki knows that little prevents Obama from bringing in troops again–or dropping drones in his country. Maybe that’s why Maliki is doing unfathomable things like laying a wreath at the military cemetery of the country that has occupied and ravaged his country for 8 years.

And, as I keep noting, the Iraq AUMF serves another purpose. That AUMF’s general language on “terrorism” has been used to authorize the use of “war powers” against people the Executive Branch claims are terrorists who have nothing to do with al Qaeda. The Iraq AUMF has been interpreted by the Executive Branch to authorize a war against all so-called terrorists, not just the terrorists who hit us on 9/11. And based on that argument, it was used to authorize the wiretapping of American citizens in the US.

Credulous journalists may want to accept the Administration’s propaganda about the Iraq war ending. But until we take the expanded powers given to the President pursuant to a vile propaganda campaign away from him, the Iraq war is not over. And Obama should not be able to use it as a campaign line until he actually gives up those powers.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

21 Responses to No, the Iraq War Is NOT Over

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @JasonLeopold: Bob Baer, ex CIA & CNN intel analyst, now just faking it on CNN: Pamela Gellar "holds diverse views. She is not known for…
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JasonLeopold Or is Bob acknowledging that didn't count for inside reasons?
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JasonLeopold Does Baer's alzheimers make him forget Amerithrax?
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @walterwkatz We had this conversation some time back. Still true, and bonkers that anybody, including dopey legislators, think otherwise
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @walterwkatz: Massively frustrated at any policies or bills that allow cops to see video of force before writing report. More to come on…
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Will_Bunch @rickperlstein I double checked to be sure. RFK announced March16 (though it was expected by then); LBJ recused on March 31.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JasonLeopold Get out!
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JasonLeopold Wait, they found time to cover it in between their food and pot taped programming??
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Will_Bunch @rickperlstein Nice piece. The only thing might add was that was likely RFK as much or more than McCarthy that ejected LBJ.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Baltimore, Bernie, and the coming 'Nixonland' http://t.co/yeinu9qpxc via @phillydotcom Fascinating thoughts by @Will_Bunch Important read.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Johngcole Check out the feed of @DaveedGR His info is not completely confirmed, but looks solid.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @joanwalsh -urg!
7hreplyretweetfavorite
December 2011
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031