DOD: No Military Operations in Panjwai Villages During Night of Attack

Yesterday, I tried to puzzle through seeming discrepancies between the victims described by Afghans and those named in Robert Bales’ charge sheet. In addition to the difference in total number (16 or 17 victims), there appears to be a difference in the sex of the described victims (Afghans described 8 victims of both sexes, whereas the charge sheet identifies 10 female victims and 7 male victims). This would seem to indicate not only more than one unidentified female victim, but male victims who were not among those named in the charge sheet.

I thought one possible explanation for the discrepancy was that some of the dead males had been deemed legitimate military targets–perhaps men who were determined to have some tie to the IED attack against NATO forces the week before Bales’ attack.

And while I still haven’t figured out the source of the apparent discrepancy (I’m not wondering whether the reporting has incorrectly reported the sex of one of the victims), and I’m not entirely sure the possibility that some of the male dead are being counted as legitimate targets, DOD spokesperson Bill Speaks checked with ISAF and has confirmed that “there were no military operations in those villages the night of the killings.”

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

15 Responses to DOD: No Military Operations in Panjwai Villages During Night of Attack

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @MotherJones: The inside story of the complicity of docs and psychologists in America's torture program. http://t.co/B0FTKeERuz http://t…
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Pachacutec_ The least criminal option anyway.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @chriswnews @Rachel__Nichols Either that or all press should ignore Mayweather and act like he is not there.
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @chriswnews: (Cont) 2nd, 3rd, 4th ?s should be the types of ?s the banned journos would ask. #MayPac @Rachel__Nichols
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @chriswnews: Should be no "misunderstanding" @ post #MayPac news conf. 1st ? to Mayweather should be abt journo ban, not the fight(cont)…
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Is there some ostensible reason for curfew in Baltimore tonight, or is just bonus opportunity fro cops to gratuitously take out frustration?
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JWGOP Go
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz No no, this is perfect. https://t.co/pwT8czCu5z
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Edelman11: @RobGronkowski @DannyAmendola @Zegna left derby now to the fight rocking out to that #geazy #patsboomsqaud http://t.co/82njP
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JamesFallows See, here in AZ after the attys are done examining a witness, jurors can submit questions that judge then asks of the witness
11hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Someone left the door open at the Trop and a bird flew in. #Rays http://t.co/WReiiNA32w
11hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @B_D_Silver No, and that is just wrong.
11hreplyretweetfavorite