DOD: No Military Operations in Panjwai Villages During Night of Attack

Yesterday, I tried to puzzle through seeming discrepancies between the victims described by Afghans and those named in Robert Bales’ charge sheet. In addition to the difference in total number (16 or 17 victims), there appears to be a difference in the sex of the described victims (Afghans described 8 victims of both sexes, whereas the charge sheet identifies 10 female victims and 7 male victims). This would seem to indicate not only more than one unidentified female victim, but male victims who were not among those named in the charge sheet.

I thought one possible explanation for the discrepancy was that some of the dead males had been deemed legitimate military targets–perhaps men who were determined to have some tie to the IED attack against NATO forces the week before Bales’ attack.

And while I still haven’t figured out the source of the apparent discrepancy (I’m not wondering whether the reporting has incorrectly reported the sex of one of the victims), and I’m not entirely sure the possibility that some of the male dead are being counted as legitimate targets, DOD spokesperson Bill Speaks checked with ISAF and has confirmed that “there were no military operations in those villages the night of the killings.”

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

15 Responses to DOD: No Military Operations in Panjwai Villages During Night of Attack

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @OKnox Btw, did you see Chuck Todd confirmed Brennan was (predictably) in KSA w/Obama?
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @zlheiden Right. I'm going to call the Queen and complain.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @quinnnorton OK, but I just hope someone does a "Sully's childish reading of the Republic" on the wall of Plato's Twitter cave I can read.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jerdemink @AthertonKD read it so both of us can avoid it. https://t.co/kML8O44ajm
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @pastordan ABSOLUTELY! Just not people who fall in love with it as literalism at an age where they should know better.
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AthertonKD Did you Storify it so I can link to it as further warning?
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AthertonKD Thankfully @MSignorile warned me, which was decisive factor in giving up.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Anyway: it's crap. Never trust anyone who doesn't read the Republic until grad school AND reads it literally. https://t.co/fP9W6sVxIc
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MSignorile It's crap. But some on the left apparently like being abused.
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Abt half way thru Sully piece hit w/dilemma: finish it so I can point out what self-indulgent crap it is or give up? https://t.co/g6NrwfhlMI
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Sully apparently missed Hillary repeatedly pointing out how much $$ Candidate Obama got from banksters. https://t.co/g6NrwfhlMI
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel How did Sully get to grad school before reading Plato's Republic? https://t.co/g6NrwfhlMI
31mreplyretweetfavorite