Strikes in CA, Republicans in FL Admitting Loss of Quality: Fallout from Long-Term Underfunding of Higher Education

Since 1985, decreased funding of state universities has forced tuition to increase six-fold while consumer prices only doubled. (Bureau of Labor Statistics data via Economix blog.)

Back in early March, Catherine Rampell wrote in the New York Times about the ongoing trend since the mid 1980′s to cut state funding for higher education, noting that it has led to cutbacks in some of the very few areas of instruction where graduates actually face better employment prospects. She put up a companion piece at the Times’ Economix blog, where she was even more explicit about how it is the refusal by state legislatures to adequately fund higher education that is leading to the current problem of decreasing educational offerings despite skyrocketing tuition costs:

But at least at public colleges and universities — which enroll three out of every four American college students — the main cause of tuition growth has been huge state funding cuts.

There was quite a Twitter kerfluffle last week over the funding situation at the University of Florida, when it was claimed that Computer Science was being shut down while funds were being shifted to the athletic department. That was wrong on both counts, as the University is still struggling with how Computer Science will be organized, but it is not going away. Rather than taking money from academics, PolitiFact explains that the Athletic Association, which is a separate nonprofit, has given back over $60 million to the University since 1991 for academic use.

Unfortunately, that story obscured the real news on higher education in Florida, when Governor Rick Scott vetoed a bill that had passed the Florida legislature with a huge bipartisan majority, giving the University of Florida and Florida State University the ability to bypass the 15% per year limit on tuition increases in order to make up a larger portion of the huge cuts in state funding for higher education in this year’s budget:

The veto comes at a tense time, with universities bracing for a painful state budget cut for the fifth year in a row. This year, the total cut to the system is $300 million.

/snip/

UF President Bernie Machen said he wanted to raise his tuition to the national average, starting with freshmen admitted for fall 2013. UF’s tuition is currently about $5,700 a year. The national average is closer to $8,000. Machen said he would’ve used the money to hire more faculty.

FSU President Eric Barron wanted to use the money to bolster FSU’s programs in science, technology, engineering and math, or STEM.

It appears that Scott may finally have gone too far, because even Republicans are now seeing the folly of cutting funding for higher education:

The quality of Florida’s state universities is bound to erode due to spending cuts and a veto of a proposal to allow steeper tuition increases at two schools, the House Education Committee’s chairman said Thursday at a meeting of the Higher Education Coordinating Council.

Rep. Bill Proctor, though, urged the schools to put the veto aside and set funding priorities that match their diverse missions.

/snip/

“That’s certainly his prerogative, but at some point we are going to have to address how we’re going to fund the state universities and, of course, the community and state colleges,” Proctor said. “At some point, if not now already, our quality is going to begin to erode. It’s inevitable. It can’t be helped.”

The St. Augustine Republican ticked off statistics indicating that erosion has begun at least at some of the 11 universities. Seven have freshman retention rates below 85 percent while six have four-year graduation rates below 25 percent, six-year graduation rates below 50 percent and minority graduation rates below 50 percent, Proctor said.

He also noted the University of Florida is the only state school that’s a member of the prestigious Association of American Universities compared to six of California’s public universities.

The funding situation in California is just as dire as in Florida. In today’s Los Angeles Times, we learn that faculty in the California State University system have authorized a strike that could occur next fall. Because their primary issues are salary and class size, it is clear that this strike is a direct result of decreased funding for education:

The union representing California State University faculty announced Wednesday that its members have voted to authorize a two-day strike should negotiations over salary, class sizes and other issues continue to stall.

The vote could result in two-day rolling strikes at the 23 campuses, most likely beginning in the fall, according to the California Faculty Assn.

/snip/

The Cal State system has raised tuition, offered fewer courses and turned away thousands of students because of budget cuts.

The union, which said faculty members haven’t received raises since 2007, is asking for 1% pay increases for each year of the new contract, more control over class sizes and greater stability for faculty with temporary contracts, among other proposals.

“The CSU faculty have run out of patience,” said union President Lillian Taiz, a history professor at Cal State Los Angeles. “It’s time to address seriously the issues before us so our faculty can get back to the business of providing quality education to the students of California.”

When even Florida Republicans are seeing the folly of reduced funding and college professors in California are reduced to threatening a strike because their salaries haven’t increased in five years, perhaps the national conversation will be able to move beyond Grover Norquist-think and actually contemplate restoring a meaningful level of investment in higher education.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

18 Responses to Strikes in CA, Republicans in FL Admitting Loss of Quality: Fallout from Long-Term Underfunding of Higher Education

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @woerma_wenhua I read it a LONG time ago, but seeing the movie again reminds me how much more textured the book was.
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz "Benevolent Protector Daddies" like Hayden, Alexander and Rogers are EXACTLY the modern day Gen James Matoon Scott's we should worry about.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @woerma_wenhua Have you read the book? I did when I was young, and its better than even Frankenheimer's film. I highly suggest it, even now
4mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Damn if John Frankenheimer movies don't hold up incredibly well, despite their period settings. John was a master, and a great guy.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @TimothyS And exactly who else put the issue squarely in front of the public?
23mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Today's Jiggs Casey is Edward Snowden. But surveillance statists would rather mock than think about those implications.
25mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz In the surveillance state/military/industrial complex of today, the heroic whistleblower would look like Edward Snowden, not a Marine.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz The joke of history is that the craven and unconstitutional scope of the NSA makes Frankenheimer/Knebel's ECONCOM look like a piker.
30mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz I would love to see @TheOliverStone remake Seven Days In May. Lawdy, that would be awesome.
34mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @jfeckstein: @bmaz Ripe for a reboot. HBO miniseries.
36mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jfeckstein I screwed up that retweet! But, hell yes!
37mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Ripe for a reboot. HBO miniseries. RT @jfeckstein Thanks to Edward Snowden, we finally know about ECONCOM. #SevenDayInMay #ButNow // YES!!
38mreplyretweetfavorite