Pakistani Drone Strikes! Now, with 10% More Enemies!

A few weeks ago, I noted a Pew poll that showed the rest of the world doesn’t like our drone strikes (and that there’s a big gender gap between men and women over drone strikes). I noted that Pew was holding off their results from Pakistan.

Maybe that’s because the results are fairly troubling.

Since Obama became President (and since the drone campaign accelerated in Pakistan), the number of Pakistanis who regard us as an enemy has gone up 10%, 5% in just the last year, to 74%.

More dangerous still, Pakistanis don’t want our help fighting extremists, nor do they want to use the Pakistani army to fight extremists in their own country.

 

Additionally, over the last few years, Pakistanis have become less willing to work with the U.S. on efforts to combat extremist groups. While 50% still want the U.S. to provide financial and humanitarian aid to areas where extremists operate, this is down from 72% in 2009. Similarly, fewer Pakistanis now want intelligence and logistical support from the U.S. than they did three years ago. And only 17% back American drone strikes against leaders of extremist groups, even if they are conducted in conjunction with the Pakistani government.

Since 2009, the Pakistani public has also become less willing to use its own military to combat extremist groups. Three years ago, 53% favored using the army to fight extremists in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and neighboring Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, but today just 32% hold this view.

If Pakistan were a nice stable country, we might be able to blow off these results and just keep droning on.

But the instability in the country and the widespread opposition to the US is a recipe for disaster.

Tweet about this on Twitter8Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook6Google+0Email to someone

16 Responses to Pakistani Drone Strikes! Now, with 10% More Enemies!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @isamuel @copiesofcopies @OrinKerr I agree. Theres significant nuance here. Frankly, I think WAY too much. 4th+5th Amendments mean something
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @billmon1 After first implicating the woman who accepted the video fr cops and then killing hotel security in process.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @billmon1 A cover up of cover up! But yes. It is rather remarkable they still haven't solved 2rd worst terror attack since 9/11, in't it?
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @LOLGOP Cleaned out uncle's basement last year, who did comms for space program. Really hit home that Apollo didn't even have an iPhone.
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @billmon1 I really have to write the "summary for sports people" of the anthrax "Investigation" don't I?
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @normative Still haven't forgotten oddly timed ones in 2005-06, including IIRC 2/24/06.
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @normative I double checked it. It's not yet rolling off the tongue, in part bc I had long confusion abt Feb opinions.
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @darth I like to imagine they showed draft to him just as he started, explaining 20 minute delay. @DVNJr @ESPN @nflcommish
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Shorterthe Ravens: We'll respond to @DVNJr skewering of us. It's gonna take few days to practice newly operative stories our lawyers write.
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @normative I think there's a 2/19/13 John Bates opinion that's proof of concept, no?
30mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nycsouthpaw Damn. That would be superb. Edgar Allen Poe describes the NFL billionaires & their flunkie playing Lord of the Flies.
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @nycsouthpaw: Quoth the Ravens: "next week in Baltimore." http://t.co/sc3ia47v1d
33mreplyretweetfavorite
June 2012
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930