Pakistani Drone Strikes! Now, with 10% More Enemies!

A few weeks ago, I noted a Pew poll that showed the rest of the world doesn’t like our drone strikes (and that there’s a big gender gap between men and women over drone strikes). I noted that Pew was holding off their results from Pakistan.

Maybe that’s because the results are fairly troubling.

Since Obama became President (and since the drone campaign accelerated in Pakistan), the number of Pakistanis who regard us as an enemy has gone up 10%, 5% in just the last year, to 74%.

More dangerous still, Pakistanis don’t want our help fighting extremists, nor do they want to use the Pakistani army to fight extremists in their own country.

 

Additionally, over the last few years, Pakistanis have become less willing to work with the U.S. on efforts to combat extremist groups. While 50% still want the U.S. to provide financial and humanitarian aid to areas where extremists operate, this is down from 72% in 2009. Similarly, fewer Pakistanis now want intelligence and logistical support from the U.S. than they did three years ago. And only 17% back American drone strikes against leaders of extremist groups, even if they are conducted in conjunction with the Pakistani government.

Since 2009, the Pakistani public has also become less willing to use its own military to combat extremist groups. Three years ago, 53% favored using the army to fight extremists in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and neighboring Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, but today just 32% hold this view.

If Pakistan were a nice stable country, we might be able to blow off these results and just keep droning on.

But the instability in the country and the widespread opposition to the US is a recipe for disaster.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

16 Responses to Pakistani Drone Strikes! Now, with 10% More Enemies!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @attackerman: Imad Mugniyah was a monster caked in blood. There is also no plausible argument assassinating him was an act of US self-de…
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @GottaLaff @ColMorrisDavis @DaisyBuddysMom I dunno, Matthews and Maddow are so pathetic anymore, getting them off air seems a public service
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @HanniFakhoury Oh, wait, that's just the legal fees? Nevermind, Arpaio is a piker then.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @HanniFakhoury Pretty cheap compared to what Arpaio has cost Maricopa County.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @howappealing Sweet. Congratulations!
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @froomkin: Why is it not huge news when Israel kills UN personnel with impunity? Because it happens so often? Read @MazMHussain https://…
8hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @SarahKnuckey Thing is, NYPD has long history of using CT team on protests. CF Tony Bologna. @trevortimm
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I'm really saddened that the IPA scene in Seattle has been degraded such that @AllThingsHLS can't even bet Super Bowl w/@caidid much less me
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @caidid They've inflated his, um, ball number. @AllThingsHLS
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Hey @pourmecoffee! @ChuckGrassley is branching out from his NIU code. https://t.co/wU4MY2aYS0
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Why does @ComcastSucks_ have so much of a harder time delivering toobz to my house on wires than Verizon on air?
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Witness the license database. Didn't you, uh, tell us it was still there? (Whatev. Go back to your hangover) @caidid
10hreplyretweetfavorite
June 2012
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930