Rehman: Drones in Pakistan “Radicalize Footsoldiers, Tribes and Entire Villages”

I had missed Christiane Amanpour’s Monday evening interview with Pakistan’s Ambassador Sherry Rehman, but an article in today’s Express Tribune alerted me to it. Video from the interview is embedded above. Putting aside the ridiculous crap added by CNN producers (I’m assuming Amanpour has better journalistic sense than to clutter news with this crap) alluding to “the marriage from hell” and the god-awful Elton John reference, the key revelation in the interview is that Rehman maintains that even though the US apologized and Pakistan reopened supply routes, that does not mean that Pakistan has agreed to more drone strikes. Further, Rehman emphasized how the strikes produce more insurgents.

From the Express Tribune article:

In an exclusive interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, Ambassador Rehman said America’s drone war “radicalises foot soldiers, tribes and entire villages in our region. And what we see, really, is that increasingly Pakistan is feared as a predatory footprint.”

In response to a question, she denied the assertions that apology over the Salala incident meant that Pakistan had allowed the drone programme to continue. However, she said that the apology over the incident that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers has “opened the space for an opportunity where we can have constructive conversations that might be to the satisfaction of both sides. Right now, we have not given a go-ahead at all”.

But she categorically emphasised that Pakistan’s concerns over the drone strikes could not be ‘brushed aside’.

Ambassador Rehman said that CIA’s covert drone war ‘tests’ the relationship between Pakistan and the US at every juncture. “We honestly feel that there are better ways of eliminating al Qaeda now, which can be done with our help. And we have been doing that consistently. We’re the heavy lifters in this relationship.”

CNN chose not to include in the video this bit of the interview which the Express Tribune found significant:

When questioned about whether Pakistan accepted the accounting of how the Obama administration identified militants, Rehman said it was worrisome “because this leads to what you call signature strikes, if I’m not mistaken, where a certain level of suspected activity generates or motivates the trigger for – I really don’t know what motivates the trigger for X level or Y level of drone strikes.”

I guess CNN doesn’t want us worrying about how the Obama administration might be killing people who don’t deserve it. That would upset the bullshit story they are trying to reinforce. They probably should add a note warning us not to read Glenn Greenwald on this question, either.

At least Rehman understands that when you take the signature strike concept to its extreme and send in follow-on strikes to hit people who are digging through the rubble of the first strike in a search for possible survivors, you are going to radicalize those most closely affected by these actions: the tribes and villages who lose members in these horrific strikes. The CIA’s choice to kill in this manner is clearly assuring the CIA of an even larger group of targets in the future, because for each victim killed in this manner, many new insurgents take up arms.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

7 Responses to Rehman: Drones in Pakistan “Radicalize Footsoldiers, Tribes and Entire Villages”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV Note to the incoming search hit at our blog: no, the Disneyland measles outbreak was NOT a Merck scheme.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DonteStallworth You look very short. Good thing you don't have to defend him.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Finally found the Black Eyed Susans I had wanted to finish off this bed. http://t.co/vB9Y7l4v3U
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Oh. I guess this partly answers my q abt discovery obligations when Feds are stealing Bitcoin fr criminal target. https://t.co/nPhck821IZ
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel What are Brady obligations to a defendant when DEA and USSS Agents are stealing his Bitcoin? Is that why Force/Bridges indicted elsewhere?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Re: New "shell" to hide phone dragnet under, remember there's an active OLC opinion saying they don't need any law. https://t.co/lOhAlV2bqW
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @lukedones I'll take it.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel My dog suffered from low thyroid and he stopped wagging tail much. Now he's back wagging tail, but only when he farts.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel NSA had to "shut down" auto alert in 2009 bc it was illegal. Presumably continued for 12333 data. Never ever got auto alert running again.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Good reason to suspect they're "ending" phone dragnet to move it to authority where they can do auto alert. https://t.co/tMA9gqbJh2
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel As I noted, AP claim that Internet dragnet went "cold turkey" is laughable. Went to more permissive authorities. https://t.co/l8JOj3U9DG
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @Mediaite: Former NSA Director: Phone Data Collection Will Probably End Soon http://t.co/ztrmjDMgr4 (AUDIO) http://t.co/VCtnE4Ff2L
3hreplyretweetfavorite