Ron Wyden to Dianne Feinstein: Pants on Fire

While the language about the FISA Amendments Act that Ron Wyden just got James Clapper to clear for release (first reported by Spencer Ackerman) doesn’t exactly call Dianne Feinstein a liar, it comes close.

Wyden got the following three statements cleared:

  • A recent unclassified report noted that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has repeatedly held that collection carried out pursuant to the FISA Section 702 minimization procedures used by the government is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.
  • It is also true that on at least one occasion the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court held that some collection carried out pursuant to the Section 702 minimization procedures used by the government was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.
  • I believe that the government’s implementation of Section 702 of FISA has sometimes circumvented the spirit of the law, and on at least one occasion, the FISA Court has reached this same conclusion. [my emphasis]

The unclassified report in question is the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report from the FISA Amendments Act extension mark-up.

Third, the numerous reporting requirements outlined above provide the Committee with extensive visibility into the application of these minimization procedures and enable the Committee to evaluate the extent to which these procedures are effective in protecting the privacy and civil liberties of U.S. persons. Notably, the FISA Court, which receives many of the same reports available to the Committee, has repeatedly held that collection carried out pursuant to the Section 702 minimization procedures used by the government is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. [my emphasis]

The passage in question comes from DiFi’s additional views.

With this declassified language, Wyden is making clear how incomplete DiFi’s claims about the law are.

But don’t worry, James Clapper’s office says. They’ve rectified the problems. Of NSA violating minimization requirements, that is, not of the Senate Intelligence Committee Chair making grossly misleading comments to push for passage of the extension.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

13 Responses to Ron Wyden to Dianne Feinstein: Pants on Fire

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel But Huckleberry Finn is on his own, which is how he likes things. https://t.co/hDpWJaiLba
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BenjaminInskeep Which makes it an apt national mammal, no? @JonathanCohn
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Truth_seek_er Precisely nothing.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel (As I've noted) this is the thing. It wasn't just Yahoo litigating blindly. They tried to make FISC rule blindly. https://t.co/rmA1U500sJ
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel The govt did shit like this to Reggie Walton at least 4 times during his FISC tenure. https://t.co/BWUZbXFpKq
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @csoghoian But I'm not entirely sure how FB is permitted to show requests pertaining to co acquired in 2014. @DavidLieber @jacklgoldsmith
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel FISC to Government: "Care to tell me which fucking certifications are in effect for these Yahoo directives"? https://t.co/KJzC2vD222
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Oops. 2009, I mean.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Also, as a reminder to anyone reading the Yahoo docs: USG released ID's they're now hiding back in 2008. https://t.co/gcIEwE4bjU
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TimCushing Just be grateful it's not ORCON.
3hreplyretweetfavorite