The Goldman Sachs Department of Justice™ Would Like to Apologize to Mr. Blankfein for the Inconvenience

By now you’ve heard that Goldman Sachs will not be prosecuted for lying to its customers and having its CEO lie to Congress.

“The department and investigative agencies ultimately concluded that the burden of proof to bring a criminal case could not be met based on the law and facts as they exist at this time,” the department said.

Mind you, it’s not a surprise that Lloyd Blankfein wasn’t prosecuted. That’s because DOJ basically rewrote law in the last couple of years to make sure Scott Bloch, the former Special Counsel, would do no jail time for lying to Congress. As a result they’ve basically taken that inconvenient law off the books. As Congress continues to pursue DOJ for Fast and Furious, I’m sure that’s a comforting thought for some in the Department.

Still, let’s pretend for a moment that DOJ really didn’t believe they could prosecute this case.

That leaves us at a place where actual people are subject to the rule of law but corporations–because DOJ is simply helpless, helpless!! against those big bad corporations–are not. If DOJ really refuses to prosecute any corporations for the very same crimes they’re imprisoning actual people for, it needs to start considering how it is rushing our country headlong toward Banana Republic status. That is, if it can’t or won’t prosecute corporations but–perhaps to justify taking a salary until such time the prosecutors check out and join the corporations they’ve set free–still jails the little people, then DOJ has become just another cog in the machine slowly turning our great democracy into a NeoFeudal land.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

16 Responses to The Goldman Sachs Department of Justice™ Would Like to Apologize to Mr. Blankfein for the Inconvenience

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @Popehat @adamsteinbaugh I maybe knew that, but that isn't me. Just looking for some creative ways to defend. Hell, theyve to be out there!
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Popehat @adamsteinbaugh You laugh, but this is a very nice teacher trying to help students, and neither she nor her dog did anything wrong.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @adamsteinbaugh No duty to not have dog there, in fact was approved program by the school over years that won awards.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nigelduara Pats fan. After Packers and Cardinals, of course!
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @adamsteinbaugh ...the teacher/owner of the dog because the kid stumbled over it and fell. I think this is horseshit, but need some help.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @adamsteinbaugh No, kid was pretty much, by his own admission, running w/o looking+stumbled+fell over innocent dog. Parents fucking sue...
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @adamsteinbaugh Now she is being sued by the parents of some kid who negligently stumbled over the dog+hurt wrist in an enclosed playground.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Owner is teacher who brought dog to school to help struggling kids have something to read to. Won awards over years. https://t.co/jJqaKw42y6
18mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Owner is award winning teacher, and incident happened on school grounds in enclosed area (i.e. not at large) https://t.co/BN1escm4R6
25mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Okay Legal Hive Mind: Need help as to defenses for innocent dog (and owner) tripped over in enclosed area by negligent kid w/greedy parents.
27mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Rex Ryan-shaped corn maze is pretty magical http://t.co/7F2aggRRqK or why the arrogant Jets+lowly Fish should shut up about winningAFCEast
43mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @NickKristof: My column on our nutty, sex-crazed Congress: Read and weep http://t.co/hvjXZwStEX http://t.co/8PeQlimvXD
1hreplyretweetfavorite
August 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031