NYPD’s Spying Program: Not a Single Lead

All the spying on Muslims the NYPD has been doing for the last decade plus?

It has not led to a single investigation.

That’s what the head of NYPD’s intelligence program, Thomas Galati, said in a deposition in June on whether the Department was violating the Handschu Guidelines.

Q If they make an assessment of what’s being brought in, warrants, some action, does that indicate that an investigation has commenced?

MR. FARRELL: Objection.

A Related to Demographics, I can tell you that information that have come in has not commenced an investigation.

And the one investigation that Galati says might have derived from Demographics Unit information–which has been referred to elsewhere as a case that came from this spying–is that of James Elshafay and Shahawar Matin Siraj, where the NYPD paid lots of money to an informant to coax two troubled young men into declaring the intent to attack a subway station.

Q You’re saying that based on what has occurred during your tenor, correct?

A Yes.

Q Do you know whether that was also the case before you took over the Intelligence Division?

A I think that prior to me, there had been indication that there was one place that was visited later, that later on became subject of an investigation. However, I have not been able to determine that. That case involved a prosecution, but I have not been able to definitively say that it was because of Demographics.

That it. That’s what has come out of all the money and time invested in mapping out the Muslim hangouts in NYC.

The AP article describes other details Galati admitted to (better not speak Urdu in the city) and I’ll have a few more things to say later today. But we now have confirmation from the guy heading the program: all this spying has not identified a single terrorist.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to NYPD’s Spying Program: Not a Single Lead

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @BradMossEsq But if it doesn't do what it is supposed to do, then we should talk about that, bc then we can shut it down.
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BradMossEsq Just you. I've never been opposed. I'm opposed to its misuse. Upstream is prone to problems, per a pushover FISA judge.
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mokecule VERY many WH journos show up to every briefing knowing there's almost no chance they'll get called. They still go.
34mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mokecule Does that change the value at all of sitting and listening for the gross majority who don't get called?
35mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @PGEddington: ICYMI: My latest on @Medium: “When Intelligence Become Advocacy” https://t.co/d9c9jly8DK
35mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @KimZetter A second run then! You can benefit from Sony hack along with 133,726 consulting firms.
39mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel LOLOLOL It is SO perfect that Roger Cohen doesn't think having boys sit and listen to girls ask questions is good for them.
39mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @DougJBalloon: Most entitled media whine ever? MT @NYTimesCohen WH might have advised male correspondents they could split on vacation e…
42mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @GregoryMcNeal It is. Bc I've been wondering all day when someone would say that to justify "proportional" response. @jacklgoldsmith
43mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @KimZetter And that was before Sony, presumably.
44mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @GregoryMcNeal Just to be clear, my offer for beer for someone finding WHITE HOUSE saying that still stands.;p @jacklgoldsmith
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @GregoryMcNeal And here I was letting them off easy (and have been noting WH has not claimed Sony was CI). @jacklgoldsmith
46mreplyretweetfavorite
August 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031