“We are running out of angry old white men in this country”

Last we heard from the top leadership of my local Democratic Party in this blog, it was telling women at a women’s political event that they had to support 61-year old (though not particularly angry) Steve Pestka because “he’s with us on everything else” but choice.

 As we were waiting for the Senator to speak, a top county Democrat was sitting several rows behind me trying to convince some of the women not to support Trevor Thomas. “There is absolutely no way he can win,” the guy said (the polling says he’s wrong, and I suspect he knows that). In addition to saying a gay man can’t win, he also said a pro-choice person can’t win in the district (his listeners pointed out that Stabenow herself had won the district; so have at least two other pro-choice candidates). Then he described Steven Pestka, using the line Michigan Democrats used to defend Bart Stupak as he was rolling back access to choice for women across the country.

He’s with us on everything else.

But the really appalling comment, uttered by a man at a women’s event, was this:

I need to win this year.

If the guy were reasonably intelligent, he might have said, “we need to win the gavel back for Nancy Pelosi.” But he couldn’t even muster a “we need to win” this year. Nope. It was “I need to win this year,” and that’s why women have to suck it up and vote for someone who has attacked their autonomy in the past.

Today, the head of the local party, Jim Rinck, is spinning yesterday’s results by promising demographics will eventually make Grand Rapids more Democratic.

Kent County Democratic Party chairman Jim Rinck said several factors contributed to the final tally – and he sees a trend toward a growing number of Democratic voters in the GOP stronghold.

“Like it or not, reality comes even to Kent County,” he said. “We are running out of angry old white men in this country. And they’re the constituents of the Kent County Republican Party.”

Sadly, Rinck was not asked why, then, the party pushed an older white man as their congressional candidate. That candidate lost to the rather young Justin Amash by almost 9 points.

That’s particularly unfortunate given the explanation one woman offered in the article for why she even decided to vote this year: Republican attacks on women and gays.

Brianna Holben, 20, cast her vote for Barack Obama Tuesday. Despite being her first-time voting, Holben said she didn’t have a real urge to participate until women’s reproductive rights and the funding of organizations like Planned Parenthood became part of the campaign.

Holben, a student at Grand Rapids Community College, also said picked Obama because Democrats, in general, are more supportive of gay marriage than Republicans.

“I have a lot of friends in the gay community,” she said. “If we live in a free country, I don’t believe a person’s religious beliefs should affect someone’s ability to pick who they marry.”

Holben might well agree with what Rinck says–the Republicans are the party of old white men. But not with what Rinck did–push an older white man rather than openly gay, women’s rights champion, Trevor Thomas, they opposed.

That is, Rinck seems to understand, abstractly, what Democrats need to do to win. But he did the exact opposite this year.

Tweet about this on Twitter2Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook2Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to “We are running out of angry old white men in this country”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @Mansfield2016: Bolden is a former general cousnel for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund; and then there's Stivers: https://…
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Is there an official definition of a Caliphate? Cause Olsen seems to think he knows one when he sees one. Wouldn't that be a "state"?
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Olsen: "NCTC, we see the results of that collection without knowing where it came from." On Section 215. Interesting.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Mueller having been caught in a lie, Olsen moves the ball and says we just have to share as much info.
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Good job by Isikoff on calling out Mueller's lie about the "gap" that needed to be filled by Section 215.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel If I were asking these questions I'd ask what happened at Mueller's May 2004 meeting at Cheney's office and at his request. Never explained.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Isikoff: DId you have any concerns ethically [about torture]? Mueller: [cuts him off] You have my answer.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MiekeEoyang He missed the entire Benghazi industry? @Isikoff
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Ali_Gharib This is you announcing your book on all the lies Israel has gotten away with? I expect to read it in 2024, then?
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nickmartin Then again, McCain will say anything to get his name in the news and appear to be relevant.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MikeScarcella But OPR and David Margolis just couldn't find any sanctionable behavior. Funny how that is.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
November 2012
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930