Will Michael Vickers Now Be Subjected to Forced Nudity?

If you’ve been following the Bradley Manning case at all, you know the government treats alleged leakers by inventing reasons to take away their clothes away.

So I wonder whether they’ll now subject Undersecretary of Intelligence Michael Vickers–who, DOD’s Inspector General has determined, provided the identity of a Special Operations planner to the makers of Zero Dark Thirty.

Pentagon investigators concluded that a senior Defense Department official who’s been mentioned as a possible candidate to be the next CIA director leaked restricted information to the makers of an acclaimed film about the hunt for Osama bin Laden, and referred the case to the Justice Department, according to knowledgeable U.S. officials.

[snip]

The case involved a determination by investigators of the Pentagon’s inspector general’s office that Vickers provided the makers of the film “Zero Dark Thirty” with the restricted name of a U.S. Special Operations Command officer who helped plan the May 2, 2011, raid on bin Laden’s hideout in Pakistan, one official said.

Though perhaps the best comparison is not between Vickers and Manning, but between Vickers and Kiriakou. Both, after all, gave the name of someone who might not be all that protected to a third party so they could conduct further investigation. With both, the name did not become public via this leak.

And John Kiriakou’s headed to prison.

There’s little chance Vickers will experience a similar fate as Kiriakou though. As McClatchy notes, the Administration has already declassified a report showing Vickers providing this name. DOJ has been sitting on the referral since September. And McClatchy’s sources are discussing how this will affect Vickers’ chances of becoming CIA Director, not whether anything worse will happen.

Even Peter King, who demanded the investigation in the first place, does not want an indictment, but appears to prefer instead to politicize the fact that he hasn’t been told about Vickers’ role.

King told McClatchy that the delay in notifying him “raises the question” of whether officials were trying to put it off for political reasons, but he wanted to see the full report before drawing any conclusions.

I’m not looking for anyone to be indicted,” he said. “But the IG does not make referrals to the Justice Department as a matter of routine. To me the fact that any information at all would be given to Hollywood producers by this administration is disgraceful.”

“If it’s wrong enough or questionable enough for the IG to refer it to the Justice Department, that means it shouldn’t have been done.” [my emphasis]

Yes, I imagine Peter King wouldn’t want to encourage top people being indicted for leaking classified information…

Which demonstrates, once again, what our classification system really is. It is not a law, to be applied neutrally to all. On the contrary, it is applied selectively, used primarily as a threat tied to higher wages tied to a clearances, but on occasion, as the premise to punish those who deviate from NatSec orthodoxy.

Update: This post originally stated Kiriakou was already in prison. He’s not. As Thomas Drake corrected me, he’s scheduled to be sentenced next month.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

4 Responses to Will Michael Vickers Now Be Subjected to Forced Nudity?

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @steve_vladeck Be sure to emphasize that Bates will be there representing his own views, not US Courts. ;p @bmaz @JameelJaffer
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MicahZenko You're convinced that lesson will last until the end of his term, come what may in Iraq? @gregorydjohnsen
4mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @steve_vladeck @emptywheel @JameelJaffer You make covert video tape for us? Turnabout spying is only fair here I think. Goose----->Gander
5mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @trevortimm sent you an email
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel @steve_vladeck @JameelJaffer Uh, yes! And the answer is??
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @trevortimm The remainder of the time to get to 63 months was from the other non-enhanced counts that were imposed consecutively.
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @trevortimm No, on count that was so enhanced, he was sentenced to 48 months, which is within guidelines on either level 21 or 23 offense.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @DanaHoule: Neocon football advice: sell arms to both Alabama AND Auburn.
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @steve_vladeck Are you ON a panel with Judge Bates? Because that might be worth seeing. @JameelJaffer cc: @bmaz
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @LOLGOP See? God was being especially generous to Sarah Palin, because he provided her with designer clothes before smiting her.
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @LOLGOP You're assuming God doesn't like treating self-important Republicans like he treated Job?
31mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JasonLeopold: Gitmo spox suggests Mohamedou Slahi's memoir Guantanamo Diary constitutes extremist literature & he cant read it https://…
35mreplyretweetfavorite
December 2012
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031