Medical Impact of US Sanctions Drives Iran’s Need for 20% Enriched Uranium

While Western media routinely proclaim the danger of Iran enriching uranium to 20% since it is “just a few short steps” from the 90%+ enrichment needed for producing nuclear weapons, what is often overlooked is the role that Western sanctions on Iran play in forcing Iran to carry out this 20% enrichment. Iran treats 850,000 patients a year with medical radioisotopes and has only a 40 year old research reactor in Tehran for producing isotopes. Despite attempts by neocons to claim that the sanctions have exceptions for humanitarian goods, the reality is that the sanctions forced Iran to produce new fuel for the Tehran reactor and we see today a mention in the Iranian press suggesting that four new research reactors are planned so that Iran can produce more radiomedicines domestically.

Here is how the medical isotope situation was described by Thomas Erdbrink three years ago:

The impending shortage of technetium-99 is caused by the controversy surrounding the Iranian nuclear program. The sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council, aimed at moving Iran to halt its uranium enrichment program, are supposed to leave medical practice unaffected. In reality, however, Iran has become unable to procure a wide range of medical products. Body scanners cannot be imported from the US or the EU, since parts in these machines could also be useful to Iran’s nuclear program. An embargo on medical isotopes was introduced in 2007, in defiance of the medical exception clause touted as part of the trade sanctions, Iranian leaders said.

Isotopes are a rare commodity produced at only five sites worldwide. One of these, the High Flux Reactor in the Dutch town of Petten, currently accounts for 30 to 40 percent of worldwide production, but it is scheduled for retirement soon. Apart from the UN sanctions, so many restrictions — particularly American — on trade with Iran exist, that in practice nobody is willing to supply Iran with medical isotopes any longer.

Out of dire necessity, Iran now uses its 41-year-old research reactor in Tehran — originally constructed by the US — exclusively for isotope production, a job which used to take only a day a week. However, the reactor’s fuel, provided by Argentina in 1993, is quickly running out, the scientists said.

The situation had not improved by late 2010:

Iran imports some ready-made isotopes, but it has faced greater restrictions under UN sanctions and has to pay higher prices to get them. Sanctions do not directly ban the sale to Iran of medical equipment, but they make foreign producers more reluctant to provide it, and those who will sell it do so at inflated prices.

“We are paying twice the value of this product to import it from Turkey,” said Mohammad Reza Ramezani, an official at Shariati Hospital, pointing to a cargo of technetium-99, the most common radioisotope used in diagnosis, that arrived from Turkey at day earlier.

Iran did indeed embark on its plan to enrich to 20% and has converted a significant portion of that 20% enriched uranium to fuel plates for the Tehran reactor, a move that leaves the uranium more difficult to subject to further enrichment to weapons grade. However, many have noted that Iran now has produced much more fuel than would be needed in the near future by the Tehran reactor and yet enrichment to 20% continues. At the end of a story carried today by Fars News Agency praising Iran’s accomplishments in nuclear technology, though, we see that Iran now plans additional research reactors. It appears that these reactors will supply material for more domestically produced radiomedicines:

 Iran in December unveiled five different radiomedicine projects with applications for diagnosis, prevention and treatment of a number of diseases.

In September, Iran announced that it plans to synthesize 20 kinds of radiomedicine inside the country, stressing that its scientists are capable of supplying the 20%-enriched uranium needed for the production of such drugs.

“Iran has gained the necessary preparedness to produce 20 radiomedicines and we will provide the 20% (enriched) fuel needed for the production of these medicines this year,” Deputy Head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) for Planning, International and Parliamentary Affairs Massoud Akhavan-Fard told FNA in September.

In addition to the Tehran research reactor which has long been used by radioisotope production, Iran plans to build four other research reactors in the other parts of the country, he added.

Since Iran plans to build four more research reactors for the production of medical radioisotopes, we now see why Iran did not stop 20% enrichment when sufficient fuel for the Tehran reactor was produced.

Oh and about the claim medical supplies are exempted from sanctions? Read this penalty enforcement announcement or this one for examples of medical supply companies in the US being punished for supplying their goods to Iran.

In a related development, Iran now has denied poorly sourced reports that surfaced over the weekend suggesting that a large explosion had taken place at the Fordow plant where 20% enrichment takes place. In following the issue of bombing Fordow, it is important to keep in mind that only the US possesses bunker-buster bombs that are believed to be powerful enough to cause any sort of harm to this plant which has been buried deep within a mountain. Even with those most powerful US bombs, many analysts believe that only the entrances to the plant, and not the plant itself, can be harmed.

6 replies
  1. What Constitution? says:

    Is this monkey’s name “Ham”, too? No, probably not. But the threat of nuclearly-armed Jihadist monkeys in low earth orbit is now on the list, huh?

  2. Bustednuckles says:

    The reports I have seen so far are all indicating sabotage as the explanation for the explosion.
    I am seeing today that Iran is blaming Israel and Hamas has ordered the evacuation of some parts of Palestein and that Muslim Republican guards are preparing to launch missile strikes into Israel in retaliation.

    At this point I have only seen one story on this aspect so it has not been verified yet.

  3. Jim White says:

    @Bustednuckles: Thanks. That is all I am seeing right now, too. I should have mentioned in the post that since the facility is so protected from outside attack, sabotage from inside seems much more likely to be successful if anyone is going to try something.

    If the facility really has been badly damaged from an inside attack, it will be impossible for Iran to prevent IAEA learning of it and seeing the damage. The next few days will give us the answer on that.

  4. P J Evans says:

    As far as I can tell, sanctions never work the way they’re ‘supposed’ to work, according to the governments imposing them.
    I suspect that not closing down diplomatic relations would have done a lot more to prevent this than anything else the US has done in the area in the last 30 years.

Comments are closed.