When All You Have Is a CyberHammer, You Have to Expect to Go to War against Nails

There are two things about this NYT article describing Obama’s new cyberwar policy that deserve note.

A secret legal review on the use of America’s growing arsenal of cyberweapons has concluded that President Obama has the broad power to order a pre-emptive strike if the United States detects credible evidence of a major digital attack looming from abroad, according to officials involved in the review.

[snip]

The rules will be highly classified, just as those governing drone strikes have been closely held.

First, according to the WaPo, the government has conducted a search of any and all government officials who have had contact with the lead author of the story, David Sanger.

Investigators, they said, have conducted extensive analysis of the e-mail accounts and phone records of current and former government officials in a search for links to journalists.

Frankly, I think the WaPo is naively ignoring the real possibility, given the updates to DOJ’s Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide, that DOJ has accessed Sanger’s email records directly.

Nevertheless, however they’ve gotten that information, the government now has a pretty good idea who speaks to David Sanger. Presumably, folks who talk to Sanger — particularly those privy to secret workings of the White House — are cognizant of this fact.

From that I assume it’s likely — though by no means certain — that the Administration is not that unhappy about having an article boasting about its aggressive cyberwar stance, even while noting that the details of it will be remain legally classified.

Meanwhile, I’m struck by this claim.

Mr. Obama is known to have approved the use of cyberweapons only once, early in his presidency, when he ordered an escalating series of cyberattacks against Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities.

Sure, there’s only been the one attack (or rather the serial set of attacks) on Iran.

But I’m struck — particularly in the wake of DOJ’s filing making it clear they’re investigating WikiLeaks as a spy, while refusing to tell us what laws it is using to conduct that investigation — that there has been a rather notable cyberattack whose author we don’t know: the DDOS attacks on WikiLeaks as it first started to release the WikiLeaks cables, and then again last summer (a group called AntiLeaks claimed credit for the second one).

As Jack Goldsmith and Thomas Rid both point out, the Administration appears to be badly fumbling cyber defense (largely because the private sector doesn’t want to play along and the Administration isn’t prepared to make them), but they are very aggressively pursuing cyberoffense. Perhaps, as Goldsmith suggests, this leak to the journalist whose contacts are being monitored is intended to deter attacks on the US (though I’m not sure how a story in a newspaper that the Chinese have hacked is going to scare the Chinese from doing what they have been doing for years).

But if the US is so intent on bragging about its offensive capability, isn’t it time we learned the scope of that offensive capability? Shouldn’t we finally know whether the government took down a publisher’s website?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

6 Responses to When All You Have Is a CyberHammer, You Have to Expect to Go to War against Nails

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz What a load of militant authoritarian police power grabbing shit https://t.co/eg51zgjqnZ
50sreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Yes, its truly incredible there is so much celebration of a woman committed to walking back criminal justice reform https://t.co/2m7YeAm0yR
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel "Experts seized household server &[desktop], both running Linux. Noticeably, they left other two Windows machines." http://t.co/XeqGlWKWiU
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel Think Carolyn Krass the one really running that part of the shop and Seitz had issues, but that only one of reasons Seitz left.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JohnWonderlich And when they invoke b5 THEN will Snowden be right when he says doing same in real time is reading your mind?
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JohnWonderlich: anyone know of a successful foia request for a gov't official's browser history?
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @mattduss: Pope Francis’ coming encyclical on climate change should make his Sept speech to Congress even more interesting. http://t.co/
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @phoenixnewtimes @MatthewHendley Jeebus, there are that many of us still here?? Doesn't seem like it.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz A truly sad and regressive day for criminal justice reform https://t.co/D1E1Pp9Nzb
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Snyder explaining how Comeback States learn to fix their own damn potholes. #GovernorPothole http://t.co/iRZ2LaZvS2 https://t.co/kCBRXtidnd
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Save a bundle On @rickhasen's book and invest it in donations to campaign finance reform! https://t.co/uIddADMysR
13mreplyretweetfavorite
February 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728