How Many of the Seven Missing OLC Opinions Authorize Targeted Killing in Unknown Countries?

Dianne Feinstein has released a statement trying to pretend the Senate Intelligence Committee’s post-killing review constitutes enough oversight of the drone program. In it, she reveals that the Committee is still waiting on 5 OLC memos on targeted killing.

Since 2010 the committee has asked for copies of all the legal opinions written by the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) at the Department of Justice on targeted killing. I have sent three letters, each joined by Vice Chairman Kit Bond or Vice Chairman Saxby Chambliss, requesting these opinions.

In 2012, the committee included a legislative provision in its annual authorization bill to require the executive branch to provide OLC opinions. Unfortunately that provision was removed prior to final passage of the bill. Until last week, the committee had been provided access to only two of the nine OLC opinions that we believe to exist on targeted killings.

Last week, senators on the committee were finally allowed to review two OLC opinions on the legal authority to strike U.S. citizens. We have reiterated our request for all nine OLC opinions—and any other relevant documents—in order to fully evaluate the executive branch’s legal reasoning, and to broaden access to the opinions to appropriate members of the committee staff.

So there are 9 total. The Committee had already seen 2. It got 2 more last Thursday. Leaving 5 memos on targeted killing — purportedly not related to US persons.

Update: Charlie Savage asked for clarification on the number. There are 11 total. The Committee is still waiting on 7.

If they don’t relate to US persons, then why is the Administration so squeamish about releasing them?

Remember, per Ron Wyden, the Administration still hadn’t provided the committee a list of all the countries it has used its lethal counterterrorism authorities.

So it’s hiding where it is using targeted killings in that form. How many specific OLC memos authorize the use of targeted killings in countries not imagined to be part of the scope of the current war on terror?

Update: I’ve changed the title to reflect the likelihood that we’re using targeted killing in some countries we’re not operating drones.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

4 Responses to How Many of the Seven Missing OLC Opinions Authorize Targeted Killing in Unknown Countries?

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel "it’s no surprise to find Yahoo!’s Matt Bai, the unofficial high priest of conventional wisdom," http://t.co/LYIg5gU8lY
11mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @OKnox And that Bush Admin precondition was seen as chosen precisely because zero chance Iran would agree. 2/2
25mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @OKnox Part of the problem was that was the Bush Admin position: all enrichment had to be ended as precondition for talks. 1/2
26mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @lrozen: Carper makes it #30 Senators supporting #Iran deal. His statement shows appreciation for complexity of Iran politics http://t.…
28mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @michaelwhitney Would this be the wrong moment to ask why groping an old white dude is now a meme?
37mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel In 2010, "Ramos was 2nd-most recognized Latino leader behind SCOTUS Justice Sonia Sotomayor" http://t.co/xiH84cNkfw Year after confirmed
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DanaHoule We have a lot more guns in this country than France does.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DanaHoule That all depends on what those rightwing populists do then.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @shekissesfrogs Ah, saw you got that right, sorry for the correx--missed the grammar pre-coffee.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AdamSerwer The Fifth Stage of Trump Grief. http://t.co/J3HAiP59G1
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jda2000 Along with RentBoy and, in much greater numbers, the millions of young black men jailed for minor things.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @shekissesfrogs Yes, I wrote about that. But you mean the escort he contacted was. That guy may be in trouble now.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728