Dianne Feinstein Commits the Drone and/or Targeted Killing Fallacy

I’m not sure whether Dianne Feinstein is this dumb, or this exchange — from follow-up questions to John Brennan’s confirmation hearings — is just an effort to trick people like Rand Paul into believing that the Administration doesn’t believe it can kill imminent threats in the US.

Could the Administration carry out drone strikes inside the United States?

The Administration has not carried out drone strikes inside the United States and has no intention of doing so.

Obama offered a similar answer in a Google hangout last night, so this must be a developing authorized line.

There has never been a drone used on an American citizen on American soil.

The white paper that has everyone so worried about drone strikes in the United States is titled — and is about — “Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen Who Is a Senior Operational Leader of Al-Qa’ida or An Associated Force.”

Lethal is lethal, whether it comes from a drone or a gun or a poison pill.

And thus far, the Administration has fallen far short of denying that it has used lethal force — targeted killing — inside the US.

Tweet about this on Twitter14Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook3Google+2Email to someone

6 Responses to Dianne Feinstein Commits the Drone and/or Targeted Killing Fallacy

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @petersuderman I think that is spot on. Last Ship is not great art, but surprisingly good entertainment. I like it.
25mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MasaccioFDL @JoshuaHol @SultanAlQassemi @rudoren @nytimes @Sulliview Not sure there was much doubt already, but this is ridiculous.
41mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Masoninblue I too think there is good chance the door hit Wilson.
43mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Masoninblue: Governor Nixon should appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the #MikeBrown shooting in #Ferguson http://t.co/4pI9mDn
44mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @bmaz: "A jury of peers", just not Mike Brown's peers RT @stltoday Grand jury in Michael Brown case: 3 black members 9 white http://t.co
46mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @onekade: Your trash heap legal system RT @stltoday: Grand jury in Michael Brown case: 3 black members, 9 white http://t.co/QikbhBCfPb
46mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz "A jury of peers", just not Mike Brown's peers RT @stltoday Grand jury in Michael Brown case: 3 black members 9 white http://t.co/DoZ0hV6InX
46mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @stltoday: Grand jury in Michael Brown case: 3 black members, 9 white http://t.co/5n4JziBVtu
48mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jaketapper Wow, that is amazing.
53mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @chrisgeidner @fordm @aclu_mo Is it possible people are confusing "incident report" with police "departmental reports" Theyre different here
54mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Thanks Obama RT @RebekahLSanders Cost for Arizona's healthcare plans expected to rise 11 percent http://t.co/RBnCCer6lL via @kalltucker
56mreplyretweetfavorite
February 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728