White House Capitulates to Benghazi Truthers Rather Than Coming Clean on Targeted Killing

The other day, I explained that the Administration would be forced either to cede to Republican demands for Benghazi talking points and other truther demands or release a full accounting why and in which countries it has conducted targeted killing.

It decided to capitulate to the Benghazi truthers rather than tell the Intelligence Committee what kind of targeted killing it has been doing.

Rather than agreeing to some Democratic senators’ demands for full access to the classified legal memos on the targeted killing program, Obama administration officials are negotiating with Republicans to provide more information on the lethal attack last year on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, according to three Congressional staff members.

The strategy is intended to produce a bipartisan majority vote for Mr. Brennan in the Senate Intelligence Committee without giving its members seven additional legal opinions on targeted killing sought by senators and while protecting what the White House views as the confidentiality of the Justice Department’s legal advice to the president.

[snip]

The administration is currently in discussions with Republican members of the Intelligence Committee about providing the trail of e-mails that were the basis of “talking points” from the intelligence agencies regarding the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, which killed the American ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, and three other Americans. Such a concession would probably win at least some Republican votes for Mr. Brennan.

I get that the Benghazi truther demands are, at this point, pointless. I get that the President would rather cede to a bunch of  nutcases  from the Republican party than Senators from his own party.

But what does it say that this information on targeted killing–which the Administration should provide to the intelligence Committees under the National Security Act, by law, in any case–is more precious than a bunch of partisan hackery the Republicans have been pursuing since September.

There must be some reason the Administration would rather kowtow to sensationalized requests from Republicans rather than commit to the transparency it’d take to get 2 Democrats and a Republican to vote for Brennan.

But no reason for doing so would be respectable.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+3Email to someone

14 Responses to White House Capitulates to Benghazi Truthers Rather Than Coming Clean on Targeted Killing

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @JonathanCohn: The Irish win the internet as thousands head #HomeToVote for equality http://t.co/I6eEAF8q91 via @dailykos
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @NadiaKayyali I'm just sad it's not quorum call bc every single time I hear clerk call out Thad Cochran's name I hear "Cockring."
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @NadiaKayyali CSPAN really ought to have lights that go on so you can tune back in for issues of interest.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Things not included in Burr's "11 Bullets to Defeat Terra." 5/n 6) Any limits on what volume of info govt can demand @emptywheel
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Things not included in Burr's "11 Bullets to Defeat Terra." 4/n 5) Will govt be able to keep info that's not foreign intel? @emptywheel
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Things not included in Burr's "11 Bullets to Defeat Terra." 3/n 4) What kinds of queries will providers be forced to do @emptywheel
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Things not included in Burr's "11 Bullets to Defeat Terra." 3) Will CDR function be usable for non-CT functions @emptywheel
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Things not included in Burr's "11 Bullets to Defeat Terra." 1) What is the data mandate 2) What kinds of records will be in "CDR" function
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Lindsey Graham thinks legislating major security programs in 51 minutes keeps our country safe. https://t.co/t0EjFtn2lK
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel On Burr's claim Roving & Lone Wolf are uncontroversial: Roving DEFINITELY has been redefined for abuse, LW probably https://t.co/1JSMrrnGSt
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Shorter Richard Burr: 11 bullet points can better keep this country safe than a 121 page bill.
29mreplyretweetfavorite
February 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728