The Script Opposing Declassification of the Torture Report Continues to Roll Out

During John Brennan’s confirmation process, he answered questions about the Senate Intelligence Committee report on torture with two faces. To Saxby Chambliss in private, he said he thought the report was a prosecutorial document, set up to come to pre-ordained conclusions. Publicly, to Democrats, he said he was shocked–shocked!–by what he had read in the Executive Summary of the report.

It was quite clear that Brennan was playing the lawmakers who would get to vote on his confirmation, but they didn’t delay his confirmation to resolve the report declassification.

When Brennan’s confirmation got delayed by demands to exercise oversight, the CIA delayed its response — originally due February 15 — on the contents of the report. Indefinitely.

All of this, of course, sets up Brennan to refuse to declassify the report because he believes (and, importantly, believed from the start, according to Saxby Chambliss) that the people who have now rushed his confirmation through were acting in an unfairly prosecutorial mode when they spent 5 years documenting what CIA did in its torture program.

Sure enough, the very day after Brennan won confirmation, WSJ reports that CIA is not done with their review yet, but they disagree with the report’s findings.

The report examines the details of conditions under which each detainee was held and interrogated, the quality of the information provided and the accuracy of how the CIA described the program to other officials and lawmakers. It included 20 recommendations, officials said.

The report assesses the utility of information from interrogations in 20 cases and concludes that it wasn’t useful; the CIA disputes that conclusion in all but one or two of those assessments, officials said.

The CIA is objecting to the majority of the report, a senior intelligence official said.

“The overall objection was the report basically says we never in any instances got good information from this program,” another U.S. official said. “To anyone who has worked at the CIA on this issue, that’s not true.”

Even CIA officers who opposed the interrogation program acknowledge that the agency obtained useful information, the U.S. official said.

Even if Brennan wanted to declassify this report — and given his stated desire to protect CIA from criticism, he probably doesn’t want to — he’d have a hard time doing so, because it would instantly turn the torture dead-enders against him, which is not the safest way to start a job managing a bunch of talented spooks.

Hell, I wouldn’t be surprised if the single “senior intelligence official” from which the CIA’s perspective is represented is Brennan. Because it has been clear throughout he was working from a script that would lead to a real, probably unsuccessful, struggle to declassify the report.

And that script is rolling out precisely as expected.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

12 Responses to The Script Opposing Declassification of the Torture Report Continues to Roll Out

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel Why does @ComcastSucks_ have so much of a harder time delivering toobz to my house on wires than Verizon on air?
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Witness the license database. Didn't you, uh, tell us it was still there? (Whatev. Go back to your hangover) @caidid
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Sure. But your cop bullshitery monitor is so finely tuned, it usu precedes MSM outrage by months. @caidid
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @caidid and yet ... no serious press is going "HOLYSHIT DID BRATTON REALLY SAY THAT?!?!"
20mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Thomas_Drake1 @MarkSZaidEsq @JesselynRadack @emptywheel @BradMossEsq Haven't seen any defamation though.
55mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Thomas_Drake1 @MarkSZaidEsq @JesselynRadack @emptywheel @BradMossEsq ...testimony about me. I can understand being touchy about it.
56mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Thomas_Drake1 @MarkSZaidEsq @JesselynRadack @emptywheel @BradMossEsq It's raining in paradise. All day. I would not have wanted that....
57mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mollycrabapple Some angry FBI Agent somewhere, cursing, "Ill show that damned artist girl!!!!" [raises fist, searches another database]
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mollycrabapple Did they tell you at what rate they're adding pages? Or will you get deeper in a hole as they add 850 new pages each month?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @PoliceLawProf: If you read nothing else today, read this: "No 'Officer Safety' Exception to the Constitution." http://t.co/rYG36wXdxu
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Krhawkins5 It was on CSPAN so the vid plus their close-cation is there. @astepanovich @jmhattem
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @robertcaruso Mitt, un-not-running? Oh wait. That doesn't work.
3hreplyretweetfavorite