John Brennan Says All the Bad Reports about CIA Are Inaccurate

Kudos to Jan Schakowsky, who used today’s hearing on global threats to ask John Brennan some of the questions he so rarely gets asked.

She started by asking him generally about drones and his previous public comments about them. He responded by noting that he was a White House figure then, now he’s CIA Director (implying, I guess, that he shouldn’t be held to his previous comments).

She then asked specifically about Jonathan Landay’s reporting on the drone strikes — which, as you’ll recall, is reported directly from intelligence reports on drone strikes. Brennan responded, “A lot of things in press are reported inaccurately, in my opinion.” (Mind you, Landay’s reports did give Brennan an excuse for having lied so blatantly about civilian casualties in the past, so I guess his reporting is inaccurate, even though it helps Brennan!)

Schakowsky then asked about the difference between targeted and signature strikes. Brennan pointed back to the earlier dog and pony show on drones, which pretended signature strikes didn’t exist.

Schakowsky then asked for an update on the torture report. Brennan revealed he had spoken with Dianne Feinstein and Saxby Chambliss earlier this week. He told them he was in the process of reviewing the report (keep in mind, the original response to SSCI was due February 15, almost two months ago) and was doing a “thorough” review of some things he believed the committee did not report accurately.

If you’re John Brennan, if internal reports on drones make the CIA look bad, and if internal reports on torture make the CIA look bad, they are by definition inaccurate.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

5 Responses to John Brennan Says All the Bad Reports about CIA Are Inaccurate

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel Sony's only on the hook for $20M for gross negligence in protecting employee data? http://t.co/RqezRqmpmD Fed employees take note.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Anti-vaxxers=murderers. https://t.co/osiW0Z8f6F
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @radicalmandy You tell the Lowes people that only GCHQ gets to laugh at Amnesty employees. (And congrats, btw)
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @agidari The report requires judges authorizing wiretaps under 18 USC 2518 and states to report. That's not all judges is it? @wendyck
35mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Infotainment hosts @WolfBlitzer + @GloriaBorger on @CNN cackling about Trump instead of reporting that hes ignorant racist lout. #BadJournos
40mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @billmon1 Sure, and if he were raising big Wall Street money Wall Street might let him win. But he will not have been purchased like that.
50mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Is it too late to invite Trump? https://t.co/nKjYSoviHz
52mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @cristianafarias @azatty For the most part, they have all gone to Sue Bolton, who is very good and efficient at dispensing with them
55mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @NSArchive: CIA's "scary" bin Laden doll sold at auction in LA; CIA continues to ignore our #FOIA for dox on it #FRINFORMSUM https://t.c…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @agidari No, my Q was, for example, whether Fed one counts NYPD wiretaps. It only reports state, not muni, wiretaps, right? @wendyck
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Outdoor chores delayed by nearby weather, but no actual rain here. We should at least get rain on pastures if I can't work...
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @RachelBLevinson Nevertheless, given that they're not protecting USP dragnet data w/tech audits, fairly safe to assume they're not 12333.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2013
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930