John Brennan Says All the Bad Reports about CIA Are Inaccurate

Kudos to Jan Schakowsky, who used today’s hearing on global threats to ask John Brennan some of the questions he so rarely gets asked.

She started by asking him generally about drones and his previous public comments about them. He responded by noting that he was a White House figure then, now he’s CIA Director (implying, I guess, that he shouldn’t be held to his previous comments).

She then asked specifically about Jonathan Landay’s reporting on the drone strikes — which, as you’ll recall, is reported directly from intelligence reports on drone strikes. Brennan responded, “A lot of things in press are reported inaccurately, in my opinion.” (Mind you, Landay’s reports did give Brennan an excuse for having lied so blatantly about civilian casualties in the past, so I guess his reporting is inaccurate, even though it helps Brennan!)

Schakowsky then asked about the difference between targeted and signature strikes. Brennan pointed back to the earlier dog and pony show on drones, which pretended signature strikes didn’t exist.

Schakowsky then asked for an update on the torture report. Brennan revealed he had spoken with Dianne Feinstein and Saxby Chambliss earlier this week. He told them he was in the process of reviewing the report (keep in mind, the original response to SSCI was due February 15, almost two months ago) and was doing a “thorough” review of some things he believed the committee did not report accurately.

If you’re John Brennan, if internal reports on drones make the CIA look bad, and if internal reports on torture make the CIA look bad, they are by definition inaccurate.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

5 Responses to John Brennan Says All the Bad Reports about CIA Are Inaccurate

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @gabrielmalor @Popehat Aw jeez, you mean it can get worse than all the disingenuous howling by both sides for the last three months? Ugh.
24mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @yvonnewingett That is great work on that piece.
45mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz As the River Runs Dry: The Southwest's water crisis http://t.co/IhX4vcQAQf via @azcentral This is a fantastic long form article.
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AliWatkins Problem is they're out of context, which is leading to more disinformation. Sigh.
46mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AliWatkins There are some new things. There are some things that are newly redacted. Outlines already known, but still a distraction.
47mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @just_security Memo has LONG been available (redacted). You'd all have lot more credibility if someone who knew that doing this analysis.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ThusBloggedA Hey, he admits he blabs abt stuff he hasn't read about. Why read those who have been writing abt this stuff?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Once again @DavidColeGtown reveals he hasn't done his homework. http://t.co/JYv8mFyCFA All known before. Many analyzed.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @RapSheet: The #Lions will not place the franchise tag on Ndamukong Suh
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Greene_DM That's why I raised Perez. Might be someone who makes everyone happy, tho see your point abt O'Malley.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Has anyone started the Thomas Perez for Senate recruitment drive yet? (Tho I'd be as happy to see Donna Edwards run)
2hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2013
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930