John Brennan Says All the Bad Reports about CIA Are Inaccurate

Kudos to Jan Schakowsky, who used today’s hearing on global threats to ask John Brennan some of the questions he so rarely gets asked.

She started by asking him generally about drones and his previous public comments about them. He responded by noting that he was a White House figure then, now he’s CIA Director (implying, I guess, that he shouldn’t be held to his previous comments).

She then asked specifically about Jonathan Landay’s reporting on the drone strikes — which, as you’ll recall, is reported directly from intelligence reports on drone strikes. Brennan responded, “A lot of things in press are reported inaccurately, in my opinion.” (Mind you, Landay’s reports did give Brennan an excuse for having lied so blatantly about civilian casualties in the past, so I guess his reporting is inaccurate, even though it helps Brennan!)

Schakowsky then asked about the difference between targeted and signature strikes. Brennan pointed back to the earlier dog and pony show on drones, which pretended signature strikes didn’t exist.

Schakowsky then asked for an update on the torture report. Brennan revealed he had spoken with Dianne Feinstein and Saxby Chambliss earlier this week. He told them he was in the process of reviewing the report (keep in mind, the original response to SSCI was due February 15, almost two months ago) and was doing a “thorough” review of some things he believed the committee did not report accurately.

If you’re John Brennan, if internal reports on drones make the CIA look bad, and if internal reports on torture make the CIA look bad, they are by definition inaccurate.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

5 Responses to John Brennan Says All the Bad Reports about CIA Are Inaccurate

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @laRosalind @emptywheel Girl, go wash everything out stat. Are you by the water currently??
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RubioBot2000 coughs up some Reagan hairballs
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel @ddayen Uh, where I come from, a $300 bottle of Chandon is actually called Dom.
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Rubio "You can't have free enterprise w/o anti-poverty programs." That's a curious claim. Also invokes Nikki Haley.
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Cruz: would appoint Mike Luttig.
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Jeb! believes he gets to speak when Donald Trump says mean (factual) things about Reagan.
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Trump, backs funding PP, bc he knows that doesn't involved funding abortion.
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Jeb! My brother invading Iraq on lies, OK; My brother building a boondoggle stadium, bad.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Next thing Trump is going to tell us he used to be a union member?
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @BillKristol: Is the Republican Party really going to nominate someone who thinks Bush (and presumably Powell, Tenet et al) KNEW there w…
31mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @toddhunter57 A pre-1964 Democrat, yeah.
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Am I right that this amounts to repealing NAFTA?
33mreplyretweetfavorite
April 2013
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930