John Brennan Says All the Bad Reports about CIA Are Inaccurate

Kudos to Jan Schakowsky, who used today’s hearing on global threats to ask John Brennan some of the questions he so rarely gets asked.

She started by asking him generally about drones and his previous public comments about them. He responded by noting that he was a White House figure then, now he’s CIA Director (implying, I guess, that he shouldn’t be held to his previous comments).

She then asked specifically about Jonathan Landay’s reporting on the drone strikes — which, as you’ll recall, is reported directly from intelligence reports on drone strikes. Brennan responded, “A lot of things in press are reported inaccurately, in my opinion.” (Mind you, Landay’s reports did give Brennan an excuse for having lied so blatantly about civilian casualties in the past, so I guess his reporting is inaccurate, even though it helps Brennan!)

Schakowsky then asked about the difference between targeted and signature strikes. Brennan pointed back to the earlier dog and pony show on drones, which pretended signature strikes didn’t exist.

Schakowsky then asked for an update on the torture report. Brennan revealed he had spoken with Dianne Feinstein and Saxby Chambliss earlier this week. He told them he was in the process of reviewing the report (keep in mind, the original response to SSCI was due February 15, almost two months ago) and was doing a “thorough” review of some things he believed the committee did not report accurately.

If you’re John Brennan, if internal reports on drones make the CIA look bad, and if internal reports on torture make the CIA look bad, they are by definition inaccurate.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

5 Responses to John Brennan Says All the Bad Reports about CIA Are Inaccurate

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @tse2935 Saw one of those close up too, eating a dead dear. I still vote bald eagle.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Seriously, "SKIDMORE v. ZEPPELIN et al" may be one of most awesome captions ever. Should actually read RANDY CALIFORNIA v. ZEPPELIN et al
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Not just roids, but hemorrhoids. https://t.co/XbEjLSb65I
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @BlanksSlate Dammit, and I wasn't even through discussing the last police shooting. Internet is fickle.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz How sweep it is: https://t.co/gXG9j7f6uE
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Are the Sawx beating the Yanks? Yes? That is a good day.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DonnaDiva Yeah, I've been conned. Good one!
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DonnaDiva Yeah, shit, 30 yrs of criminal law and I have no clue of what is scam. Probably I need a Clinton to show me a real scam.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DonnaDiva @peterdaou @kdrum That is beyond hilarious.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Also anybody who thinks Joe Biden is cuddly instead of a bought off asshole, or Jack Danforth+Hatch are reasonable https://t.co/7avXObIZNA
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Anybody reading a Clarence Thomas opinion or supporting obstruction of Merrick Garland ought have to watch HBO's "Confirmation".
3hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2013
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930