Who Are the Potential Targets of the OTHER Section 215 Program(s)

There are several small, but significant, discrepancies between what Dianne Feinstein and Keith Alexander said in yesterday’s Senate Appropriation Committee hearing on cyber and what others have said. As one example, last week James Clapper said this was the standard for accessing the dragnet of Americans’ call data:

The court only allows the data to be queried when there is a reasonable suspicion, based on specific facts, that the particular basis for the query is associated with a foreign terrorist organization. [my emphasis]

DiFi yesterday said this was the standard:

It can only look at that data after a showing that there is a reasonable, articulable suspicion that a specific individual is involved in terrorism, actually related to al Qaeda or Iran. [my emphasis]

These are slightly different things (and Congress has fought hard over the word “articulable” in very similar contexts to this in the past — plus, whichever word is used may trace back to Jack Goldsmith’s 2004 OLC opinion on the illegal wiretap program). It’s possible — likely even — that Clapper was just dumbing down his statement the other day. But it is a difference.

I’m particularly interested in the point I raised yesterday. DiFi, in discussing the NSA’s use of the Section 215 data, says it can only be used to find people in the US with ties to terrorists or Iran.

But when Clapper discussed all the potential targets the Intelligence Community might want to trace using Section 215 data, he mentioned a broader group.

There are no limitations on the customers who can use this library. Many and millions of innocent people doing min– millions of innocent things use this library, but there are also nefarious people who use it. Terrorists, drug cartels, human traffickers, criminals also take advantage of the same technology. So the task for us in the interest of preserving security and preserving civil liberties and privacy is to be as precise as we possibly can be when we go in that library and look for the books that we need to open up and actually read. [my emphasis]

But remember. Clapper oversees all 16 members of the intelligence community, including FBI and the National Counterterrorism Center. DiFi’s statement (and Alexander’s confirmation) applied only to NSA. Elsewhere in the hearing, Alexander said NSA only used what he called “BR” (for business records) to collect phone records. And we know that — at least as recently as 2011 — there was at least one other secret collection program using Section 215. So one of those other entities — almost certainly FBI — must run that program.

Moreover, there’s no reason to believe that Edward Snowden, who had unbelievable access to NSA’s networks and, some time ago, CIA’s records, would have access to programs that didn’t involve those agencies.

And Keith Alexander probably knows that.

Also, terrorists, certainly, and Iran, sort of, are legitimate targets for DOD (I’m actually wondering if the government has acrobatically justified going after Iranian contacts by relying on the still extant Iraq AUMF). For NSA to pursue drug cartels and criminals might present a posse comitatus problem (one that I believe was part of the problem behind the 2004 hospital confrontation).

So I’m wondering how many of the answers we’re getting are designed to minimize the scope of what we know by referring only to the NSA programs?

 

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

18 Responses to Who Are the Potential Targets of the OTHER Section 215 Program(s)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz ESPN boys are talking up Ryan Lindley. Maybe NBC is paying them to hype tonight's game. Cause Lindley versus @DangeRussWilson is #SquawkTalk
4mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JWGOP If there is not a Number 2 jersey involved, you are totally slacking.
19mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @bsonenstein Thanks, Brian.
28mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Is Pat Lynch still employed as a spokesman for NYC cops today? If so, why? What a disgrace to men and women who wear the blue uniform.
50mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @downi94 Broth is also really easy, so soup too.
51mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Hey, @mortreport just made a Burl Ives reference! Drink!!
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Anthrax attack, which Bush rushed to blame on Iraq, remains unsolved. https://t.co/MqbHAwVvOS Maybe good lesson why not to rush v. NK?
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @downi94 Roast a chicken (if you have a pan). Really really high return on simple prep.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @GregJKrieg People might actually start to question his factual claims when he can no longer pretend he learned it in a Top Secret brief.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @GregJKrieg In his own mind, absolutely.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @bmaz: As you wait for "independent" Goodell/NFL/Rice report of Robert Mueller Matchsticks recall he sandbagged Amerithrax https://t.co/
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Shorter Mike Rogers: Damnit, Obama, why can't you start an ill-considered war w/nuke power while I'm still relevant??http://t.co/kENcHkw5oF
1hreplyretweetfavorite
June 2013
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30