Blurred Line? Really? What a Perfect Analogy

As Barack Obama’s relentless pursuit of a violent intervention in Syria continues, cliches have been tossed out freely in each new segment of the corporate news cycle. We had “credibility” for quite some time, and then yesterday there was “go it alone” (see the capsule summary for this article on left of page for “go it alone” phrase) when David Cameron lost a parliamentary vote authorizing British cooperation in military action yesterday afternoon. But an article published last night by the New York Times provided, whether intentionally or not, the perfect analogy for Obama’s drive for war in Syria. When I tweeted it last night, the title for their article was “Military Analysis: Aim of a U.S. Attack on Syria: Sharpening a Blurred ‘Red Line’”. That phrasing immediately calls to mind the latest pop misogynistic hit “Blurred Lines”. [The “unrated” version of the video is definitely NSFW.] The Times has now changed its phrasing somewhat, with the latter part of the headline reading “Restore a ‘Red Line’ That Became Blurred”.

Okay, so by changing their phrasing, the Times appears to be signalling that they didn’t mean to draw a parallel with the song, but I still feel it is a perfect fit for the situation. The lyrics are a disgusting collection of violent sexual suggestions for what the artist wants to do to a “good girl”. And that seems to fit so well for what Obama wants to do to Syria (while Assad certainly doesn’t fit as “good”, the innocent civilians who will die do fit): “I’ll give you something big enough to tear your ass in two”. And if that isn’t enough, we even get this in the music video:

Who has a big d.

Doesn’t this strike, when all is said and done, amount to nothing more than Obama proving he has a big d? When even large numbers of military officers are now openly questioning the wisdom of an attack, and insisting that it will spiral inevitably into a larger regional war, Obama’s determination to proceed is all about the size of his d.

Granted, in the LA Times yesterday, there was an anonymous suggestion that Obama only wanted an attack “just muscular enough not to get mocked”, but from where we simple taxpayers sit, mocking seems the only tool we have left for trying to prevent one atrocity leading to many more under the guise of good intentions.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

15 Responses to Blurred Line? Really? What a Perfect Analogy

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @CitizenCohn Evidence v Brady, even Pats, inconclusive. But ruling already a win for workers: says employers can't be totally arbitrary.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Seanismoney Uber case looks cool too. But this is sheer hubris on part of owners so it'd be awesome if it backfired on oligarchs generally
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Hoping that by appealing (and hopefully losing again) NFL creates a big fat precedent for workers in 2nd C.
29mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Roger Goodell, having been told his claim to independence is for shit, doubles down on "integrity of the game." http://t.co/ay4roRZiht
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ryangrim You gonna write up the heroin plan? Someone in A2 got saved w/naloxone yesterday.
55mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Zackamondaloo I did say "unjustified." Faith is faith.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen Well I am NOW bc of Jay Feely.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen Tho it might be time for me to unmute my block on Harbaugh.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen Yeah, that's nuts. My expectations are VERY low.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @WALLACHLEGAL: Why Berman's decision is "reversal-proof": the improper exclusion of Pash as a witness is based on CA2 law and goes to fu…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @billmon1 To say nothing of climate change driven migration.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @carolrosenberg Probably for you, sure, but they'd have a hard time doing that to the lawyers @JonathanHafetz
1hreplyretweetfavorite