EFF: The Fourth Amendment Is Not Top Secret

EFF is requesting that the judge in its FOIA for the October 3, 2011 John Bates FISA Court opinion, Amy Berman Jackson, review the redactions currently in the document to ensure they are properly classified. (h/t Mike Scarcella) It argues the court should undertake such a review because disclosure of the things DOJ had previously claimed were Top Secret has now proven “the agency’s previous blanket withholding assertions were overbroad and wholly without merit.”

To support that case, they point to this passage originally withheld from production.

Upon even a cursory review of the Opinion, it is apparent, DOJ’s blanket exemption claims were far broader than the law allows. For example, this passage, according to the agency, was appropriately “classified at the TOP SECRET level” and withheld from the Opinion:

The Fourth Amendment provides:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Opinion at 67 (reciting Fourth Amendment); see also Bradley Decl., ¶ 5 (Opinion “withheld in full pursuant to FOIA Exemptions b(1) and b(3)”).

Now, I’m actually not sure about this argument. In recent years, after all, the Fourth Amendment has been almost entirely disappeared without a trace. I wouldn’t be surprised if the government had disappeared it as a conscious policy decision. So perhaps they really do maintain that the Fourth Amendment must now be hidden pursuant to the Executive Order governing classified information.

Technically, the government previously argued that revealing the existence and text of the Fourth Amendment would cause exceptionally grave harm to the United States — that’s what the Top Secret classification it withheld this material under means. [Update: Or, as Nigel puts it, that the opinion referenced the Fourth. Except that’s even more absurd because the FOIA was a response to Ron Wyden’s declassification of a statement that said the FISC had found in this opinion that the program violated the Fourth.]

We’ll see whether Judge Jackson agrees that was a reasonable claim.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+7Email to someone

8 Responses to EFF: The Fourth Amendment Is Not Top Secret

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @Atrios Re Moar Taxes: Confluence of lot of things here. But mostly this was truly core Phoenix election, and Phx has some great progressive
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @cody_k In fairness, barring injury, you are projected to have a very good year this year in the Pac-12.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @KellyFlood3 Would like that!
4hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @joanneleon It's floating laminate.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @KellyFlood3 Hey, went to Mejico the other day. Fantastic food....and reasonably priced too. Like that place!
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @KellyFlood3 Meh, can live w/o that tree, but it ripped up a key water feed pip in the process. No water in house until tomorrow am.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @shenebraskan This one is toast. Has a date with a chainsaw.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @samhusseini: Great summary: “@evakatrina: Bernie Sanders: We Need More #Saudi Intervention. Wait, *what*? http://t.co/dcSgow3KB9
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mczajko Not sure. Hopefully the latter.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @CostaSamaras: Probably should include this and other needed resiliency investments in the social cost of carbon estimates. https://t.c…
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BryanSmart One excuse for not prosecuting the banks is bc a lot of people would lose their job. Guess what? @Object_InSpace
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BryanSmart Sure. Just like helping Al Qaeda get money for terrorism is against law. Lynch didn't prosecute HSBC for that @Object_InSpace
6hreplyretweetfavorite
October 2013
S M T W T F S
« Sep   Nov »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031