CIA and the President: The Warm Embrace of Mutual Incrimination

Brennan with TortureAndrew Sullivan is newly convinced — but surprised and confused — that President Obama is permitting John Brennan to hold up the release of the Senate Torture Report.

It is becoming clearer and clearer that one major power-broker in Washington is resisting the release of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s allegedly devastating report on the torture program run by the Bush-Cheney CIA. That major power-broker is the Obama administration.

You might be surprised by this, given the president’s opposition to torture and abolition of it. But the evidence is at this point irrefutable

[snip]

Brennan answers to the president, who has urged the release of the report.

So why the hold-up? That is the question.

Why is Obama allowing Brennan to undermine Obama’s own position? Why is the president allowing the CIA to prevent the very transparency he once pledged to uphold? I don’t know. But what I do know is that it is now Obama who is the main obstacle to releasing the Senate Report on Torture.

Mind you, the evidence was pretty irrefutable back in May, too, and became more so in July. Moreover, I’m not sure Obama has “urged the release of the report” — though Joe Biden has.

The explanation for Obama’s silence on this report seems pretty obvious if you read both Stephen Preston’s answers to Mark Udall’s questions and Obama’s past actions on torture. In short:

  • Torture was authorized by a Presidential Finding — a fact Obama has already gone to extraordinary lengths to hide
  • CIA has implied that its actions got sanction from that Finding, not the shoddy OLC memos or even the limits placed in those memos, and so the only measure of legality is President Bush’s (and the Presidency generally) continued approval of them
  • CIA helped the (Obama) White House withhold documents implicating the White House from the Senate (Sully does not note this fact, but Katherine Hawkins, whom Sully cited, did)

With specific reference to documents potentially subject to a claim of executive privilege, as noted in the question, a small percentage of the total number of documents produced was set aside for further review. The Agency has deferred to the White House and has not been substantively involved in subsequent discussions about the disposition of those documents.

Indeed, I wonder whether the evidence in the Senate report showing CIA lied to the White House is not, in fact, cover for things some in the White House ordered CIA to do.

This is, I imagine, how Presidential Findings are supposed to work: by implicating both parties in outright crimes, it builds mutual complicity. And Obama’s claimed opposition to torture doesn’t offer him an out, because within days of his inauguration, CIA was killing civilians in Presidentially authorized drone strikes that clearly violate international law.

Again, I think this is the way Presidential Findings are supposed to work: to implicate the President deeply enough to ensure he’ll protect the CIA for the crimes he asks it to commit.

But it’s not the way a democracy is supposed to work.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

10 Responses to CIA and the President: The Warm Embrace of Mutual Incrimination

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @ryanjreilly: “I immediately thought I was going to be shot, or was about to be killed.” — Bmore firefighter on officer Brian Rice http:…
33sreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @ryanjreilly: A Baltimore firefighter feared that the cop charged with manslaughter in #FreddieGray case was going to kill him: http://t…
47sreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ScottGreenfield Well, I do appreciate what the blue defense is doing, but do despair it being given any particular credence.
1mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @rsingel Yes, I love the Stones!
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Restrepo-----> Pat Toomey Is Blocking His Own Judicial Nominee, For Some Reason http://t.co/1Yiy8Mz7Ey
9mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @rsingel Ryan....was it really necessary to link that?
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Probably a former DEA guy I guess.... https://t.co/OrNUyNRlcP
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @joe_palazzolo There is going to be a lot of pitches like that coming from police defense; how they are defending is news+I want to hear it
29mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @elizabeth_joh That is because nobody seems to understand the difference between a felony take down arrest and a Terry stop.
41mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @elizabeth_joh @joe_palazzolo Problem w/this argument is that they had arrested Gray before discovering the knife at all cc @ScottGreenfield
1hreplyretweetfavorite
October 2013
S M T W T F S
« Sep   Nov »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031