“Journalists” Still Parroting DiFi’s Fear-Mongering

Excuse me for a little post holiday crabbiness.

But people who write stories like this are really not doing their jobs.

Appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-CA said there was “huge malevolence” against the United States, and warned that the terrorism threat against the country is on the rise.  “I think terror is up worldwide,” she said. “The numbers are way up.”

[snip]

Both lawmakers admitted that the more diffuse nature of today’s terrorist groups has made it harder to counter potential threats. Rogers pointed out that the rise in al-Qaeda affiliates spread around the globe raises the risk of a smaller scale attack and makes it “exponentially harder” for U.S. intelligence to keep track of them all.

It has been clear for two weeks that this fearmongering is part of an attempt to justify the dragnet. But the premise and the response are so illogical they should never be presented as “news.”

If we’re less safe, then what thousands of experts will be fired for screwing up the war on terror?

If we’re less safe, then why aren’t our overseers scrambling to understand why massive dragnets haven’t kept us safe?

If we’re less safe, than why isn’t the press asking why both Dianne Feinsein and Mike Rogers be fired for their failures?

If we’re less safe (and the real numbers don’t support these fear-mongers), then the response should be far more aggressive than simply repeating the claims that show a massive failure on the part of our security establishment.

But, if the claims are transparently bullshit, then reporters should not report them as fact.

Tweet about this on Twitter12Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook15Google+0Email to someone

9 Responses to “Journalists” Still Parroting DiFi’s Fear-Mongering

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV RT @ElSnarkistani: Q: At what point do mass shootings become terrorism? A: When it’s a brown shooter. Carry on with the ISIS fear monge…
31mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @ElSnarkistani: We need ISIS because asking for more $$$ to fight homegrown terrorists means you’re worried about white people.
31mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @Casual_Obs: "U.S. isn’t sure just how much to fear Islamic State". http://t.co/bhKY73F75q #NotTheOnion cc: @FearDept
31mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @abumuqawama Isn't it a relative question?
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @StephanieKelton: Feds wanted homebuyers convicted in mortgage fraud case. @WilliamKBlack helped them win unprecedented acquittal. http…
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sarahjeong Cmon. It's not true sport unless you knock over someone with a walker.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Since when did "trolling" become synonymous w/ANY questioning credibility of author which @TheNation intellectually is selling? #JustStop
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @riversidesam Uh, no. I was not "trolling" Zirin in least. I asked him pertinent questions, in multiple ways, because he never answered them
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @Caissie: So @gofundme removed racist comments made by donors to Darren Wilson's campaign, but will let campaign continue? No more GoFun…
11hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@riversidesam Well, when you see Zirin "clarify his position" about execution of black men by citizens versus a cop, let me know.
11hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @SunSportsRays: A beautiful first career complete-game shutout by @SmylyD 👏👏👏 Masterful. 105 pitches. A gem. Rays win 8-0. #AllSmyles
11hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@riversidesam I posed it in different form because he neglected to answer any. If you, or he, call that "trolling" that is total bullshit.
12hreplyretweetfavorite
December 2013
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031