DFIP

Handoff of Detention Facility in Parwan Marred: Afghan Government Places Higher Value on Rule of Law Than US

Following on the heels of the initial agreement that was virtually meaningless from the start, because the US still retained veto power of many of Afghanistan’s moves, the US today allowed Afghanistan to hold a “splendid” ceremony marking the “complete” handoff of prison control to Afghanistan. As might be expected, the handoff is not complete, and the US is still insisting it retains many powers the Afghans dispute.

Khaama provides a summary of the ceremony:

U.S. officials handed over formal control of Afghanistan’s only large-scale U.S.-run prison to Kabul on Monday, even as disagreements between the two countries over the Taliban and terror suspects held there marred the transfer.

Control of the jail has been hailed by Kabul as a victory for sovereignty, but analysts said it was largely a symbolic measure, as Nato prepares to leave Afghanistan after more than a decade fighting an insurgency.

/snip/

“I’m happy that today we are witnessing a glorious ceremony that marks the handing over of responsibilities of Afghan prisoners to Afghans themselves,” acting defence minister Enayatullah Nazari said.

Multiple reports point to the establisment of an Afghan system for prolonged detention of prisoners without charges as the primary area of disagreement. The New York Times provides the transcription of the US government’s position on the dispute:

The coalition would not say what its concerns were, but some Afghan officials have raised objections to the system of no-trial detention that the United States insisted the Afghan government embrace at Parwan. This system allows the continued imprisonment of wartime prisoners deemed too difficult to prosecute but too dangerous to release.

The Times provides no basis for how we are to understand that these detainees are both “too difficult to prosecute” and “too dangerous to release”. How are we to understand the danger these prisoners pose if the evidence against them is not tested in a court?

The Washington Post dances around the edges of this issue, suggesting that the US position is governed by classified evidence, but that this practice has drawn “international criticism”:

 The United States has held suspected militants for years on the basis of classified, undisclosed evidence, drawing international criticism.

Writing in Foreign Policy, Chris Rogers summarizes the situation in more detail, drawing on a report from Open Society Foundations (funded by George Soros), for which he is an attorney:

This partial handover has come at a high cost for Afghanistan: the creation of a new internment regime that will allow the Afghan authorities to detain without trial. A number of Afghan officials have called this new regime unconstitutional and fear it will be subject to abuse.

The creation of an Afghan internment regime appears to have been introduced largely at the behest of the United States, in order to facilitate the handover of U.S. held detainees, and satisfy the U.S. desire for a lasting internment system on the Afghan side into which it could continue to transfer future captures. Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @IWPCHI @mock_kevin This lays it out pretty honestly from what I know https://t.co/hR9lmHTVRR But it was just an analogy to start with
56sreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @_FloridaMan: Florida Man Apologizes For Repeating Himself Too Much; Immediately Repeats Himself https://t.co/7tDSGkolVF
12mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @banditref: Dear Vols, Saying "college athletics have always been dirty" isn't an excuse for or reason not to treat sexual assault seri…
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @mock_kevin @IWPCHI Yeah, exactly. All within about a three year span in a critical period. Not meant to be perfectly equivalent.
19mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @shannynmoore: Does anyone know if #Carly Fiorina is selling off the parts of her aborted campaign? #AskingForAFriend #GOP2016
21mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @IWPCHI @mock_kevin In fact, she made a special trip to see him during his last hospital stay before his death.
27mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @IWPCHI @mock_kevin Uh, no it is not. She was still an active "young Republican" in college. And she was friends w/Goldwater until his death
28mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MentalRiot You don't know me for squat. And speaking of "angry", take a look in the mirror right now. Run along.
31mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @rachaelmbade: Trump 0n HRC $600K Wall Street speech: Actually I have been paid much more than that, but I don’t represent the governmen…
38mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MentalRiot She is a fucking warmonger nightmare. But thanks for your little bullshit "history lesson".
39mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MentalRiot Hahahahaha, yeah, golly thanks.
40mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Wonder how long it would take to get someone to do a movie based on that Ferguson complaint.
43mreplyretweetfavorite
February 2016
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829