Northern Alliance

Afghan High Peace Council, Taliban and Northern Alliance to Meet in Paris This Week

Reuters reports that after the final French combat troops were withdrawn from Afghanistan on Saturday, Paris will host a meeting this week between the Afghan high peace council and the Taliban. It appears that talks have been ongoing for some time, but it is quite encouraging that the parties are now willing for it to be announced publicly that the discussions are taking place. From the Reuters story:

France said on Sunday officials from the Afghan government, the Taliban rebel movement and other factions would meet this week near Paris to discuss the country’s future as NATO troops prepare to pull out in 2014.

Speaking on RFI radio, Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, whose country withdrew the last of its combat troops from Afghanistan on Saturday, said Afghan President Hamid Karzai had given his green light to the meeting.

“Discreet talks have been taking place between different factions for three years,” Fabius said.

“If you want peace, it’s usually between people who don’t agree, and over there they don’t talk to each other. So there will be discussions, but it won’t be negotiations.”

The story goes on to point out that both the exact date and location for the meeting will not be disclosed and that the location will be “entirely closed off”.

We get more on the meetings from Afghanistan’s Khaama Press:

A senior Afghan high peace council official said three members of the council will attend the Paris conference.

Abdul Hakim Mujahid a former Taliban group member and Haji Din Mohammad advisor to president Hamid Karzai are among the three officials who attend and meet the Taliban group members.

Farhadullah a spokesman for the Afghan high peace council said Afghan peace delegates will clarify the stance of Afghan peace council regarding the peace negotiations in Paris conference.

Meanwhile Abdul Hakim Mujahid who was presenting the Taliban group in United Nations and is currently a member of the Afghan high peace council said they will hold direct talks with the Taliban group members during the summit.

Mr. Mujahid said the conference is based on Afghanistan and only Afghans should decided how to resolve the current crisis and war in the country.

Significantly, the Reuters piece points out that the Northern Alliance also will be taking part in the meetings. Recall that the US supported the Northern Alliance in the overthrow of the Taliban after the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.

Missing from both stories is any mention of US involvement in the peace talks. Instead, the US appears to be spending its energy at the current time trying to negotiate an agreement with Afghanistan that will provide blanket immunity for US troops staying beyond the planned end of 2014 end of combat operations by coalition forces. Also, Washington is consumed with developing a plan for how many of these US troops will remain behind and what their roles will be. Apparently, these efforts are a higher priority to the Obama administration than negotiating a peace that would make our presence unnecessary.

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz Good grief, that really is some pretty ignorant rubbish from Prof Lerner. On the whole, civ+crim juries do just fine https://t.co/fNxfGgiGFy
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JamesWWeirick @BradMossEsq @radleybalko ...by a crafty and discrete attorney. These guys were just dopes.
32mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JamesWWeirick @BradMossEsq @radleybalko Hey, there could have been a legal and extremely confidential settlement agreement made here.
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel BR 15-24 turns 93-days old today, the longest dragnet order ever. https://t.co/ZySYAe0rcF Regular pen registers must be renewed at 90 days
49mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @zappin_liberals I am also confused how the oligarchs that fund Clintons are worse than oligarchs that fund GOP POTUS candidates.
56mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @zappin_liberals I am. As I said, I've covered both GOP and Democratic email destruction. So far, only the former hides known crimes.
57mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @zappin_liberals So you agree GOPers have a long history of doing so? Well, it's a start. And Hillary's crime is...? GOP-style corruption?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel What's amazing abt DC is its crumbling infrastructure is w/in sight of shiny Defense Contractor buildings. http://t.co/vYtJfWtfvP (Correx)
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel In flyover country, we have all the crumbling infrastructure, but not the visible contrast w/publicly funded private sector boom economy.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @zappin_liberals That people in both parties destroy emails, but GOPers do it to avoid criminal accountability? Ok. I think I got that now.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Yep, hard to argue with this: https://t.co/588qzcwSXC
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz A horrendous practice ratified by Connecticut Supreme Court https://t.co/Yht9rvdUQF
5hreplyretweetfavorite
May 2015
S M T W T F S
« Apr    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31