DOJ Reportedly Will Pay Ashli Babbitt’s Estate $5 Million; Claims to Have Charged LaMonica McIver

One thing even good reporting on Stephen Miller’s attempt to deport hundreds of Venezuelans under Miller’s nested false claims that they are members of Tren de Aragua and that Tren de Aragua is a terrorist group directed by the Venezuelan government to invade the United States misses is that Miller is doing it to aid in false equivalences.

Both Miller and Trump propagandist Mike Davis illustrated this the other day.

Davis falsely claimed that the Supreme Court, in ruling against Trump’s attempt to render detainees over Easter weekend, provided habeas in just 24 hours. But, Davis claimed, it took the same court 30,000 hours to “provide relief” to Jan6ers “persecuted by Biden,” by which he meant those who were prosecuted under 18 USC 1512(c)(2).

Ultimately SCOTUS narrowed the application of the law to those who corruptly tampered with evidence involved in a proceeding. Almost everyone charged with obstruction premeditated their effort to disrupt the vote certification, to deny Joe Biden his victory and his supporters their right to have their vote counted.

Miller called these people who attacked democracy, “innocent Americans.” He, like Davis, called the Venezuelans “terrorists.”

CATO’s David Bier released a report yesterday showing that 50 of the men already sent to to Nayib Bukele’s concentration camp were not only not proven to be terrorists, but had been admitted into the United States legally. Most were detained because of their tattoos.

These legal immigrants include a temporary visa holder and four men who were authorized to travel through the US refugee program. The government vetted these refugees abroad and concluded that they would face persecution, letting them resettle in the United States. The other 45 legal immigrants scheduled appointments using the CBP One app, through which they were permitted to seek entry. Among those with appointments, 24 were paroled into the United States, where they could live and work legally for up to two years, while the other 21 were detained at the port of entry.

[snip]

These people came to the United States with advanced US government permission, were vetted and screened before arrival, violated no US immigration law, and the US government turned around and “disappeared” them without due process to a foreign prison. It is paying the Salvadoran government to continue to keep them incarcerated.

[snip]

Most, at least 42, were labeled as gang members primarily based on their tattoos, which Venezuelan gangs do not use to identify members and are not reliable indicators of gang membership. According to court documents, DHS created a checklist to determine that heavily weights “dressing” like a gang member, using “gang signs,” and, most critically, tattoos. No criminal conviction, arrest, or even witness testimony is required.

DHS’s images of “TdA tattoos” include the Jordan logo, an AK-47, a train, a crown, “hijos,” “HJ,” a star, a clock, and a gas mask. But as the American Immigration Council’s Aaron Reichlin Melnick has shown, all of these supposed TdA tattoos were not taken from Venezuelan gang members but rather stolen by DHS from social media accounts that have nothing to do with TdA or Venezuela. For instance, DHS obtained its TdA “Jordan” from a Michael Jordan fan account in the United States. It pulled its AK-47 tattoo from a Turkish tattoo artist.

Because these men were denied due process, the public had no opportunity to obtain a real accounting of any evidence against them.

By comparison, those charged with obstructing the vote count for January 6 were arrested on criminal complaints sworn out to a judge, given initial hearings, and convicted via a trial or confession. They got due process.

Stephen Miller called them innocent, even those who admitted to willfully attempting to obstruct the certification of Joe Biden’s win.

Monday, SCOTUS lifted the stay on a Temporary Postponement of Kristi Noem’s efforts to deport Venezuelans from whom Trump withdrew Temporary Protected Status. Those with individual challenges can continue their challenges but Trump can move forward with deportations.

As part of the same effort to decriminalize January 6, DOJ has agreed to pay Ashli Babbitt’s estate almost $5 million to settle a wrongful death claim related to Babbitt’s invasion of the Speaker’s Lobby where Congress was trying to escape an armed mob.

The Trump administration has agreed to pay just under $5 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit that Ashli Babbitt’s family filed over her shooting by an officer during the U.S. Capitol riot, according to a person with knowledge of the settlement. The person insisted on anonymity to discuss with The Associated Press terms of a settlement that have not been made public.

The settlement would resolve the $30 million federal lawsuit that Babbitt’s estate filed last year in Washington, D.C. On Jan. 6, 2021, a Capitol police officer shot Babbitt as she tried to climb through the broken window of a barricaded door leading to the Speaker’s Lobby.

The officer who shot her was cleared of wrongdoing by the U.S. Attorney’s office for the District of Columbia, which concluded that he acted in self-defense and in the defense of members of Congress. The Capitol Police also cleared the officer.

This is Trump’s goal, Stephen Miller’s goal; it is how Miller got Trump elected. Trump has always claimed investigations into himself and his mob were unjust, but his own investigations into Joe Biden’s kid and before that Hillary Clinton was a hunt for corruption.

Trump’s power rests on claiming up is down, attacks on the US are noble and the defense of rule of law is a crime, accountability for anyone on his team is unjust.

Finally, today, Alina Habba announced on Xitter (nothing appears to be filed yet) that she is dismissing the petty trespassing case against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka “for the sake of moving forward” — or, more likely, because video evidence shows that when he was asked to leave Delaney Hall, he did so, and only after that was he arrested. But in the same statement, Habba announced she was has charged Congresswoman LaMonica McIver, who was shoved while she was objecting to the arrest of Newark’s mayor, which right wingers describe as an attempt to body slam the cops arresting Baraka. McIver is being charged with the same assault charge used against hundreds of Jan6ers who have since been pardoned for their crimes.

Habba claims she,

persistently made efforts to address these issues without bringing criminal charges and [has] given Representative McIver every opportunity to come to a resolution, but she has unfortunately declined.

Uh huh. McIver probably declined to do what CBS is about to, to falsely admit guilt when there is none. In a statement, McIver called the charges political.

McIver, D-10th Dist., called the charges filed by Habba, an appointee and former lawyer for President Donald Trump “purely political.”

“Earlier this month, I joined my colleagues to inspect the treatment of ICE detainees at Delaney Hall in my district,” McIver said in a statement. “We were fulfilling our lawful oversight responsibilities, as members of Congress have done many times before, and our visit should have been peaceful and short.

“Instead, ICE agents created an unnecessary and unsafe confrontation when they chose to arrest Mayor Baraka. The charges against me are purely political—they mischaracterize and distort my actions, and are meant to criminalize and deter legislative oversight.”

The charge comes amid a WaPo report that Pam Bondi is (was?) considering eliminating the requirement that investigations into Members of Congress and other public officlas involve DOJ’s Public Integrity Division. The Division would have, in this case, warned DOJ officials that in past cases (most notably with people like Scott Perry and Jim Jordan) DOJ determined charges for such actions might violate separation of powers.

Trump not only doesn’t care about things like that, infringing on Congress’ powers is the point.

As I said to Nicole Sandler Friday, Trump was always going to find a way to charge a Member of Congress, just like he found a way to charge a judge. Habba has done so here where McIver has a clear immunity claim, and has done so as someone who clearly has conflicts. Habba’s statement lacks DOJ’s boilerplate comment asserting that charges are just allegations. And the siren in her tweet will add to any claim McIver makes that this violates due process.

Sure, Habba claims she tried to avoid this. But the entire scene at Delaney Hall was designed to elicit such confrontation, to create nesting legal attacks out of which Stephen Miller can spin his lies.

These developments are all of a piece. They are all an effort — one Trump has been pursuing for a decade — to replace rule of law with rule of mob.

Share this entry
89 replies
  1. Rugger_9 says:

    Convict-1 / Krasnov is OK with the ‘rule of mob’ (nicely done) but only as long as it’s ‘his’ mob doing the ruling. Peaceful BLM protestors or so-called ANTIFA don’t count, and his minions had one shot in PDX without trial to prove the point.

    For those followers of weedy history, one of the more notorious mobs was in Alexandria, Egypt in Ptolemaic times, used as a weapon as well as being frequently out of control with a tendency to turn on a dime. They managed to kill a Pharaoh and remained a menace until summarily broken by Julius Caesar (yes, that one). There is a lesson there.

      • Dark Phoenix says:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3__NN16uoXk

        [Moderator’s note: please don’t drop video links in comments here without providing context. You’re asking readers to subject themselves to Google’s ad universe on blind faith that the content at the link is of interest and useful.

        Community members: the YouTube link above is to an animated clip paired with Black Sabbath – The Mob Rules (Heavy Metal). The YouTube poster added no description of the video beyond the band and song names. /~Rayne]

  2. Zinsky123 says:

    The freeing of the January 6th convicts and the glorification of Ashli Babbitt, chaps me worse than almost any of Trump’s other atrocities and that is saying something! Her family should be suing Rupert Murdoch’s media outlets, Breitbart, Daily Caller and other right-wing propagandists for their inflammatory rhetoric leading up to January 6th, that radicalized susceptible people like Babbitt and caused her to think she was justified in trying to violently enter the halls of the Congress of the United States!

  3. Memory hole says:

    Paying off the estate of the terrorist Ashli Babbitt, who lost her life while commiting a terrorist act against her country is disgusting. I am flabbergasted and outraged that the Trump administration could even consider it.
    I can’t conceive of a way her estate could have won a case against the government. The video evidence is overwhelming. Her death was earned by her actions. It also may have saved other lives as it slowed the violent mob that was about to begin entering the chambers where lawmakers were fleeing for their lives. Or hunkering down for battle.
    So, maybe that last part was her “hero” act. What ever happened to responsibility for your own actions for the right wing?

      • Memory hole says:

        Wow. There can’t be very many prosecutors that agree with that. I hope it is just the weaponizers directing the DoJ.
        Next up for Trump might be a posthumous pardon for Ricky Shiffer. He was the Trump deluded individual who tried to get in the Cincinnati FBI office armed with a nail gun and rifle. Then he died in a shootout.

        • xyxyxyxy says:

          But you wouldn’t think any big name law firms, Amazon and media firms would capitulate to him.
          On second thought, Amazon would.
          Let’s see if Walmart does too.
          He’ll probably pardon Chauvin, the McMichaels and Bryan.
          It won’t help Chauvin till there’s a different governor in MN.

    • Rugger_9 says:

      Lindsay Beyerstein has a rundown of what the J6ers have been up to since they were pardoned. It might be a good counterpoint to Noem’s ads. FWIW, she faceplanted in Congress today.

  4. HCGorman says:

    Seems this would violate section 4 of the 14th amendment. But I guess violating the constitution whenever he can is one of his goals.

  5. allan_in_upstate says:

    Meanwhile, Zachary Alam, who vandalized and assaulted a path for Babbitt
    into the Speaker’s Gallery, was sentenced to 8 years for it and then pardoned,
    has been arrested for … wait for it … breaking and entering. From behind WaPo’s paywall:

    “A Virginia man who assaulted police at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and smashed the glass pane through which Ashli Babbitt climbed before she was fatally shot, has been arrested again outside of Richmond. Zachary J. Alam is accused of breaking into a home this month while the residents were there. He appears to be the first Capitol rioter arrested on new charges after President Donald Trump granted clemency to the roughly 1,600 people charged for their roles in the insurrection. …”

    Sounds like a bad hombre.

  6. Gacyclist says:

    Micki has been making bank off her daughter’s corpse for years now. Surprised she didn’t have her stuffed and on display at freedom corner. She hit the jackpot now.

    • Troutwaxer says:

      I would not go so far as to say Babbit’s family should be charged for the bullet, but I’d come close. Their sheer scumminess outrages me

  7. Peterr says:

    I am awaiting the news that Mike Johnson will rename the doorway to the House chamber “The Ashli Babbitt Defender of Democracy Entrance,” complete with a nice brass plaque.

    And I wish I was joking.

      • Wild Bill 99 says:

        No, once Trump finds out the diamond is there he will have it moved to the oval office or his Mar-a-Lago bedroom.

  8. xyxyxyxy says:

    From BNN:
    Home Depot “says more customers are delaying larger projects due to persistently high interest rates.”
    Furthermore, anybody believe this part of the story, “The retailer plans to hold prices steady and will reduce non-U.S. imports to 10 per cent by next year.”

    • coral reef says:

      Low-margin retailers are not going to sell products at a loss. So either they raise prices or have empty shelves. There are huge numbers of goods (remember early Covid days) that simply cannot be replaced with products produced in US.

    • Shadowalker says:

      “ will reduce non-U.S. imports to 10 per cent by next year.”

      That’s a curious way of putting it. Home Depot is notorious for approaching established national manufacturers and telling them what they will charge per unit. It’s so low that they not only have to manufacture overseas, but need to reduce the quality of the product vs the US manufactured counterpart. So are they reducing all imports or just direct imports?

      • Snowdog of the North says:

        Walmart does the same thing. I have manufacturing clients, and they have told me that every year, Walmart comes along and says “here’s what your price to us will be next year.”

  9. Matt Foley says:

    Ashli Babbitt took a freedom pill for Trump and he didn’t even attend her funeral or pay for it.

    She and Matthew Huttle will spend eternity together in MAGA hell.

  10. harpie says:

    Lawyer for Venezuelans deported to El Salvador prison arrested
    Ruth López held without access to lawyers at secret location
    accused of ‘embezzlement’ a decade ago
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/19/el-salvador-lawyer-arrested-deported-venezuelans Thomas Graham and agencies in San Salvador Mon 19 May 2025

    Senator Chris Van Hollen:

    https://bsky.app/profile/vanhollen.senate.gov/post/3lpkuvtw4zk2d
    May 19, 2025 at 8:56 PM

    I met with Ruth in El Salvador just over a month ago to discuss the abysmal human rights situation there.

    This news of her likely disappearance is exactly the kind of abuse she warned about. The Bukele regime must release her NOW. [screenshot]

    • harpie says:

      Quinta Jurecic spoke with Ruth López’s colleague:

      https://bsky.app/profile/qjurecic.bsky.social/post/3lpmfquqfrf2i
      May 20, 2025 at 11:30 AM

      For the @lawfaremedia.org daily podcast, I spoke with Cristosal’s Noah Bullock about Nayib Bukele and CECOT. About 12 hours before we were set to record, Salvadoran police arrested Bullock’s colleague Ruth López, who leads Cristosal’s anticorruption work.

      we talked about Bukele’s decision to partner with the Trump administration by holding migrants in CECOT, but also about the ongoing crackdown inside El Salvador as Bukele attempts to silence dissent. López’s arrest is an alarming escalation.
      [link to podcast]

  11. harpie says:

    Steve Bannon pushes for habeas corpus showdown at the Supreme Court by the end of June Bannon: “We are going to suspend the writ of habeas corpus if the courts keep ruling against us and don’t allow these mass deportations to continue” https://www.mediamatters.org/steve-bannon/steve-bannon-pushes-habeas-corpus-showdown-supreme-court-end-june John Knefel 05/16/25

    […] On May 10, Bannon interviewed Article III Project founder Mike Davis about what they both characterized as a looming showdown with the judicial branch in general, and the Supreme Court specifically, regarding President Donald Trump’s authority to restrict immigration. […]

    • Matt Foley says:

      “I don’t think a beautiful baby girl that’s 11 years old needs to have 30 dolls. I think they can have three dolls or four dolls. They don’t need to have 250 pencils. They can have five.”

      On the other hand, Steve Bannon can wear all the shirts and pens he wants. Because this is a free country. You can’t let the communists win.

      • harpie says:

        Yes…quite unbelievable. [Is Hassan regretting her vote, yet?]

        […] NOEM: Well, Habeas Corpus is a Constitutional right that the president has, to be able to remove people from this country, [HASSAN interjects] and suspend their right to

        [0:10] HASSAN: No. Let me, let me stop you, Ma’am.
        Habeas Corpus is, excuse me, that’s, that’s incorrect.

        NOEM: [still talking]: President Lincoln used

        HASSAN: Habeas Corpus. Excuse me. Habeas Corpus is the legal principle that requires that the government provide a public reason for detaining and imprisoning people. If not for that protection, the government could simply arrest people, including American citizens and hold them indefinitely for no reason. Habeas Corpus is the foundational right that separates free societies like America, from police states like North Korea. […]

        • harpie says:

          Here’s the rest of it, continuing directly:

          [HASSAN]: As a Senator from the Live Free or Die state, this matters a lot to me and my constituents, and to all Americans.

          So, Secretary Noem, do you support the core protection that Habeas Corpus provides, that the government must provide a public reason in order to detain and imprison someone?

          [1:01] NOEM: I support Habeas Corpus. I also recognize that the President of the United States has the authority under the Constitution to decide if it should be suspended or not.

          [1:11] HASSAN: It has never been
          NOEM [continuing]: Let us be clear
          HASSAN: It has never been done without approval of Congress. Even Abraham Lincoln got retroactive approval from Congress.

      • soundgood2 says:

        If you listen to the entire clip you see that she does understand as she then says they have the right to suspend habeas corpus in order to remove people from the country.

        • john paul jones says:

          Politicians like Noem often have a briefing book made up for them prior to their appearances. Based on the similarity of the phrasing of various Trump picks, I would love to see the briefing which the White House prepared. Is there any way Members of Congress could request such a document, or is it purely within the Executive realm?

        • LaMissy! says:

          I think a common error we make is who the audience is for nonsense like Noem’s propagandist response. It’s for Trump, Faux News, NewsMax, not the rest of us.

          Kayfabe is the hallmark of this administration

      • harpie says:

        As Chris Geidner says:
        https://bsky.app/profile/chrisgeidner.bsky.social/post/3lpme45fbv223
        May 20, 2025 at 11:01 AM

        This is literally Noem’s response to SCOTUS letting her vacate Venezuelan TPS: I can go further now. [LINK]

        Links to:
        SCOTUS allows one big anti-immigrant Trump policy to take effect More than 600,000 Venezuelans in America could have their legal status cut by Sec. Noem’s decision. And: Lower courts face improprieties in Trump admin deportations.
        Chris Geidner May 19, 2025

        • xyxyxyxy says:

          The whole country saw this coming.
          And there’s no leader calling for complete stoppage of work and shutting down the whole country till this stops.

        • Rayne says:

          I have been biting my tongue since I read your comment five hours ago and I’m tired of the taste of my own blood.

          Stop waiting for a heroic person. We are the leaders we have been waiting for, and when we each of us as individuals can’t find a way to resist, we are failures — not some monolithic mythological person who will lead us forward.

          This woman:

          Liberty Leading the People - oil painting by Eugene Delacroix c. 1830

          didn’t exist. She’s a metaphor representing the people’s compulsion to seek liberty, painted after the July Revolution. I shouldn’t have to spell out the rest.

          There are leaders who’ve been calling on us for action if you look harder. You could be helping them out there instead of complaining here.

        • Troutwaxer says:

          What Rayne said. Get out there and protest! (Or whatever.). But fucking do something!

    • earthworm says:

      from Snyder piece:
      “Echoing Russian claims at the time, Martin claimed that US intelligence was wrong about the coming full-scale US invasion of Ukraine, when is in fact it was entirely correct.”
      think this is a typo, meant to be Russian invasion of Ukraine?

  12. OldTulsaDude says:

    Concerning the Babbit Gambit, I wonder how much honorarium was required as kickback?

  13. harpie says:

    1] https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3lpmbqscmbf2f
    May 20, 2025 at 10:18 AM [Senate Hearing]

    HASSAN [to NOEM]: If POTUS tries to suspend habeas corpus & a federal court reverses him, will you comply w/the court order, or will you follow POTUS’s directive?

    NOEM: We are following all federal court orders

    H: That is not true for anybody who reads the news

    N: I wouldn’t rely on the news for your facts [VIDEO]

    2] https://bsky.app/profile/chrisgeidner.bsky.social/post/3lpmuy47sfc2a
    May 20, 2025 at 4:02 PM

    NEWS: These filings allege the Trump administration has *already* sent flights to South Sudan in violation of an existing preliminary injunction.
    [Click on the LINK here for earlier INFO and links for docs]

    Emails attached appear to confirm the claims. [screenshots][THREAD]

    • harpie says:

      Here’s Aaron Reichlin-Melnick:

      https://bsky.app/profile/reichlinmelnick.bsky.social/post/3lpmujssitk2j
      May 20, 2025 at 3:55 PM

      [SIREN] According to litigators, ICE just put a dozen men on a flight (which may have already taken off) to SOUTH SUDAN, a country on the brink of civil war, in direct defiance of a court order requiring ICE to give people an opportunity to raise objections before being sent to a country not their own. [Link to Josh Kovensky]

      Litigators filed an emergency request for a restraining order to halt the flight from taking off or, if it’s already in the air, to turn it around.

      Citing the Supreme Court’s decision on the Alien Enemies Act, they emphasize that people on the flight were denied due process. [screenshot]

      [Informative THREAD]

      5:18 PM I’m told that there may be a hearing ongoing right now over the request for a temporary restraining order.

    • harpie says:

      Quinta Jurecic:

      https://bsky.app/profile/qjurecic.bsky.social/post/3lpmwibdmku2w
      May 20, 2025 at 4:29 PM

      [links Kovensky THREAD] this is in the same case (DVD v DHS) where the admin previously tried to quickly remove people to Libya under the judge’s nose, and also where it came out that the administration misled the court about whether or not it had asked a man whether he feared violence in mexico before removing him there

        • JVOJVOJVO says:

          I remember when CBP were civil servants and had ZERO police or military role. I remember when they were legislatively altered to become a weapon. This has been obvious for a very long time imo.

        • Ginevra diBenci says:

          Increasingly, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) is that secret police. They’re the ones showing up, pathetically untrained for the job, to grab folks off the street and disappear them.

          I’m always looking for Stephen Miller’s long, evil fingers in these plots. HSI is where I’m seeing them creeping most insidiously. They’re inept (see the “scrum” in Newark) but nothing is laughable with this crew; they use their own ineptitude to accuse others of transgressions they cause.

  14. BRUCE F COLE says:

    This raises the question that keeps coming back:
    If White has now become the New Black,
    It follows, as tight as Day does Night
    (Does it not) that Black is now th’ New White?

  15. JVOJVOJVO says:

    If Venezuala is attacking America (allegedly using the TdA to do it), why isn’t America attacking (or at least threatening to allegedly attack) the TdA (ie, Venezuala) back if Venzuala doesn’t immediately make TdA stop attacking America?! Allegedly. This is not complicated imo!

    • BRUCE F COLE says:

      Excellent question! Thanks very much.

      The answer, of course, is that Trump would be *starting* or *instigating* a war if he did that, the pretext for which being patently bogus by virtue of the published US Intel Community’s judgement itself (on top of the clear evidence of our own eyes, as the purported attackees) that there is no “invasion” of us by them, in all but the most contorted, hare-brained of meanings that Bondi’s FBI squeezed out like a dry turd — and the fevered paranoia of his fascist imaginings.

  16. harpie says:

    Read this THREAD for the latest on the RENDITIONS to South Sudan:

    https://bsky.app/profile/reichlinmelnick.bsky.social/post/3lpnexhyr522k
    May 20, 2025 at 8:48 PM

    UPDATE: In a late-night court hearing, the Trump admin says that it deported the Burmese man to Burma, but is REFUSING to say where they deported the Vietnamese man, claiming it’s classified!

    The judge ordered ICE to tell everyone involved they may face criminal contempt. [THREAD]

    • harpie says:

      Katherine Hawkins replies to A R-M [above]:

      https://bsky.app/profile/krhawkins.bsky.social/post/3lpnkp54dak2m
      May 20, 2025 at 10:31 PM

      I am glad the judge made this threat.
      I am not confident in his ability to enforce it. [screenshots]

      Some things that can go awry:
      1. Government can stonewall factfinding efforts.
      2. Government can invoke state secrets privilege.
      3. Government can invoke deliberative process privilege.
      4. Government can invoke presidential communications privilege.
      5. Government can refuse to prosecute

      [THREAD continues]

      13. In order to overcome executive lawlessness the courts need the other political branch’s help. I am working on a piece that goes into more detail onto how they could start…

    • harpie says:

      Chris Geidner with more:

      https://bsky.app/profile/chrisgeidner.bsky.social/post/3lpngct62622b
      May 20, 2025 at 9:13 PM

      BREAKING: Following today’s emergency hearing, Judge Brian Murphy orders the Trump administration to “maintain custody and control of class members currently being removed to South Sudan or to any other third country,” such that he could order their return if needed. [screenshot][link]

      The hearing will continue at 11a Wednesday, and DOJ must be prepared to name everyone removed and explain: “(1) the time and manner of notice each individual received as to their third-country removal; and (2) what opportunity each individual had to raise a fear-based claim.”

      For those asking: These various steps are (1) making a record for if he were to find contempt, (2) to protect his jurisdiction, and (3) to make clear ahead of time what DOJ has to do at the next hearing so they can’t sandbag him there.

    • harpie says:

      Ambassador Janet Sanderson (Ret.) via Cheryl Rofer:

      https://bsky.app/profile/jastucaz.bsky.social/post/3lpnfrswq4s2h
      May 20, 2025 at 9:03 PM

      This is what our embassy in South Sudan has issued to the American traveling public.

      The Embassy itself is on ordered departure, meaning all non-essential personnel have left the country.

      And this is where the administration is sending people?
      It’s obscene. [screenshot][THREAD]

      First sentence, emphasis original:

      Do not travel to South Sudan
      due to crime, kidnapping and armed conflict. […]

    • harpie says:

      https://bsky.app/profile/joshuajfriedman.com/post/3lppg6wru7k2f
      May 21, 2025 at 4:16 PM

      NEW: The Trump admin tells a fed judge that it can conduct the legally required credible-fear interviews for ~7 deported men now sitting on a plane—reportedly in Djibouti on their way to South Sudan—right where they are, without returning them to the US. Order expected ~5:30 p.m. ET. HEARING THREAD: [LINK]

      The judge found that the govt had violated his order not to deport anyone to third countries without proper notice and credible-fear screening.

      Plaintiffs raised concerns about private access to attorneys, interpreters, and info about South Sudan. The judge said the govt would have to accommodate.

      DHS and DOD are investigating local lodgings for the men on the deportation flight—not sure if that means Djibouti or anywhere else they might fly to—with facilities for lawyer communications. The govt obviously wants to avoid bringing them back to the US.

      We may hear more from the govt in a ~5 p.m. ET filing, then from the judge ~5:30 p.m. ET or after. [Nothing yet at 6:15 PM]

    • harpie says:

      Chris Geidner with the run-down on Judge Murphy’s ORDERS:

      https://bsky.app/profile/chrisgeidner.bsky.social/post/3lppqwhkqpc23
      May 21, 2025 at 7:28 PM

      BREAKING: Following today’s hearing, Judge Brian Murphy offered a “clarification” of his prior preliminary injunction, including a minimum of 10 days for a person to raise a fear-based claim before any third country removals. [Links][screenshots][THREAD]

      BREAKING: In finding that the Trump administration violated the preliminary injunction in D.V.D. v. DHS
      […]
      Murphy also orders a declaration addressing the possibility of chain refoulment — being sent back to their country of origin from outside the U.S., despite the U.S. not having been able to send them there and thus sidestepping any protections the person might have had here against such a move. [emphasis added][…]

    • harpie says:

      Marcy just reposted this on Bluesky:

      https://bsky.app/profile/gbrockell.bsky.social/post/3lpr5uearuk2o
      May 22, 2025 at 8:52 AM

      Important detail in this Irish Times story about the private jet to hell: Irish authorities say the plane is set to land at Shannon tonight for it return trip. [Link to Irish Times]

      It says the plane is scheduled to land at 930pm local time, but it’s 2pm in Ireland, and the plane hasn’t left Djibouti yet. I don’t think this is possible. Maybe they filed that return trip before the hearing saying the men couldn’t leave US custody.

      THEY COULD BRING ALL OF THEM BACK!

    • harpie says:

      Following on from a comment in the pokey:

      DEFENDANTS COULD BRING ALL OF THEM BACK TODAY.

  17. Savage Librarian says:

    Mob Operators

    They’re trashing with another snarl,
    And playing the Dear Leader part,
    Rate the muckrakes of their mistakes,
    They’re dissed in many languages,
    Crime and spite, Rubio’s tight,
    pie in the sky,
    Chevron deference strikes and balls.

    Crime and spite, cover ploys,
    They fall from grace with minimum taste
    and maximum noise,
    Gritty fights and business flights,
    As they transpire: fubar quagmire,
    mob appetites.

    A place for inflicters of vindictive arts,
    Where precedence is in a trance,
    Democracy pending,
    rule of law torn apart.

    So if you ask:
    It’s the mob operators
    Mob operators
    Mob operators
    Mob operators

    Boast to boast, narcissist imago,
    Western male,
    Fascists from north to south,
    Mar-a-Lago: Govt for sale.

    Place to place, each public face,
    The shadow court, the fingers crossed,
    The rats, the race,
    Connivance and bluff,
    due process is tolled,
    As their accessories
    will change or else fold,
    Wiseguys all have angles,
    Liberty controlled.

    So if you ask:
    It’s the mob operators
    Mob operators
    Mob operators
    Mob operators

    Boast to boast, narcissist imago,
    Western male
    Fascists from north to south,
    Mar-a-Lago: Govt for sale,
    Mob operators
    Mob operators
    Mob operators
    Mob operators
    Mob operators
    Mob operators

    Mob operators
    Mob operators
    Mob operators
    Mob operators
    Mob operators

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlvxaCxhinE

    “Sade – Smooth Operator (Live Video from San Diego)”

    • Ginevra diBenci says:

      So much better than the original! My favorite line: “precedence is in a trance”–too damn true. But also beautifully poetic.

      • Savage Librarian says:

        Sade is brilliant, both the band and singer/lyricist. Their song is world-class. I’m glad I could bring some attention to it for those not aquainted with it. And I appreciate how the structure gave me an opportunity to make a comment about current events. Win-win. Hope Sade doesn’t mind.

  18. P J Evans says:

    I’m seeing stories now about that $%^&*!!! 747 that it’s not the property of the Qatari government, but the personal property of one of their sheikhs, possibly their Big Guy.
    I want the AF to park it at Davis-Monthan and tell The Felon Guy that if he wants it as his pesonal plane, he can pay for the refurbishment and the fuel costs out of his billions.

    • Snowdog of the North says:

      I want him to be told he can’t have a personal plane at any price. If he wants that, he can resign and own all the planes he wants.

    • earlofhuntingdon says:

      LOL. Smoke and mirrors. As if the ruling Sheikhs were not Qatar’s govt.

      Oh, and the Emoluments Clause prohibits an officer of the USG from accepting a gift from, “any King, Prince, or foreign State,” which would seem to easily include a very senior Sheikh in Qatar.

      • xyxyxyxy says:

        In my mind I can hear Bartiromo and Pirro shrieking, “why is the admin getting so much heat about the Emoluments Clause?”

  19. OldTulsaDude says:

    The entire ideology of the right has been conscripted to serve the needs of an incorrigible write-ness:
    “So it shall be written; So it shall be done.”

  20. xyxyxyxy says:

    From BNN, Doge at another criminal enterprise, “TD Bank plans to cut about two per cent of its workforce in an effort to reduce its cost base and achieve greater efficiency. The bank…says the restructuring will cost up to $700 million in pre-tax charges over the next several quarters….TD’s CEO Raymond Chun is leading a review of the bank after PAYING OUT MORE THAN US$3 BILLION TO U.S. AUTHORITIES OVER ITS ANTI-MONEY-LAUNDERING FAILURES. TD beat earnings estimates in the latest quarter after setting aside less money than expected for souring loans.”

    • earlofhuntingdon says:

      Hard to overstate how bad TD Bank Group’s money laundering must have been for it to agree to pay $3 billion in penalties. How unregulated capitalist of them to make employees pay for the systemic illegality of its senior executives.

      After paying out $3 billion to the Feds, why was its former CEO Bharat Masrani allowed to retire instead of being indicted? Because he cooperated and promised not to do it again? Guffaw.

      • xyxyxyxy says:

        Bartiromo after the biggest fine in banking history was imposed on JP Morgan and paying out $16 billion in fines over a three year span about a decade ago, “LEGAL PROBLEMS ASIDE, JP Morgan remains one of the best if not the best banks in the world. Do you believe the leader of that bank should step down?”
        And besides that the Board had no problem with Dimon overseeing losses of billions to JP Morgan as a rogue trader kept doubling up on his losing bet.
        And Dimon is still CEO today.

  21. xyxyxyxy says:

    Just received email from CREW.
    “Tonight, Donald Trump is hosting a dinner with the top holders of the $TRUMP memecoin he profits from *and* a private reception and White House tour for the top 25 investors….
    The value of the coin had stabilized until April 23, when Trump announced the memecoin dinner at his club for the top 220 owners of $TRUMP and a private reception with Trump at the White House.
    After the announcement more than 50,000 wallets purchased the coin, pushing its market cap to $2.7 billion at its peak….
    A CREW investigation found that 50 invitees hold tokens linked to alt right symbols and racist language.
    Reporting also revealed that most attendees of the events are likely foreign, with all but 6 of the top 25 holders and at least 56% of the leaderboard’s top 220 holders using foreign exchanges not available to Americans….
    The scheme has been exceptionally lucrative for the Trump family and its partners, who’ve made a total of $312 million in trading fees on the coin, and at least $3 million since the dinner was announced.”

  22. Memory hole says:

    Sorry for the off topic. I have a question I wonder if the legal minds could help with.
    The “big beautiful bill” that is being rushed in the middle of the night apparently contains some provision that (certain?) government employees can’t be held in contempt of court by federal courts.
    It appears that members of the administration are already ignoring court orders, including the Supreme Court directives.
    If this passes and Trump signs it into law, is it basically the Enabling Act, creating a dictator with no checks? Could courts find that provision invalid, unconstitutional?
    I think making a law that you can ignore the law and court orders has got to be Trump’s, Miller’s, Bannon’s, and Vought’s favorite part of this disaster of legislation.

    • Snowdog of the North says:

      From what I understand, the provision purports to require that a bond be posted at the outset of the case to enable enforcement of court orders such as injunctions or contempt findings. I am far from an expert on this subject, but it seems to me that one issue for the GOP is that, to the extent the provision would purport to affect existing cases by requiring a bond at the outset of the case which obviously cannot be complied with now, that would be an ex-post-facto law prohibited by Article I, Section 9.

      For future cases, the provision can be easily evaded by judges requring a nominal (say $1) bond. To the extent the bond would be set at an unaffordable level, I think there would be an argument that the statute is unconstitutional as applied, violating the due process clause of the 5th Amendment by closing down access to the federal courts.

      In any event, I think there is an argument that to the extent it purports to limit the inherent contempt power of the federal courts, it violates judicial independence as provided by Article III.

  23. MsJennyMD says:

    The Retribution Regime rewards abusive behavior.
    Corruption, cruelty and criminality continues to be the currency of the Republican party.

Comments are closed.