Tulsi Gabbard Accuses Kash Patel of Covering Up for the Obama Deep State
Suspected Russian asset Tulsi Gabbard has released a report of screen caps out of context and one 114-page collection of documents purportedly showing what she claims is a conspiracy against Donald Trump.
It serves its purpose — because a broad swath of very stupid people are currently frothing madly about it on Xitter.
What Tulsi purports to show is that the FBI didn’t back expansive claims of Russian involvement in election interference in September and October 2016, refused to participate in a assessment in December, only for Obama to order a new assessment, after which — Tulsi claims — the assessment changed to reflect more confidence in Putin’s involvement.
In general, Tulsi accomplishes the circus trick of getting stupid people to buy her narrative by conflating whether spooks thought Russia hacked the US voting tabulation infrastructure with Intelligence Community confidence that Russia was involved in the hack of the DNC and DCCC and then involved in the dissemination of files stolen from it.
So:
Voting infrastructure
Hack and leak
Not the same things
Tulsi assumes her rubes won’t notice she’s doing that and — lo and behold!! — she’s right!!
As one example of how transparently shoddy Tulsi’s “work” is, note how she misquotes a story (which she attributes to spooks but which might come from Congress) talking about the larger Russian intelligence operation in 2016, claiming it pertains exclusively to the “U.S. Election Hack.”
Tulsi doesn’t link the underlying story, for good reason, because reading the story gives away her game.
While it does use the word “hack” in the title, it includes two details that undermine Tulsi’s information operation.
U.S. Officials: Putin Personally Involved in U.S. Election Hack
New intelligence shows that Putin became personally involved in the computer breach, two senior U.S. officials say.
Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used. The intelligence came from diplomatic sources and spies working for U.S. allies, the officials said.
[snip]
The latest intelligence said to show Putin’s involvement goes much further than the information the U.S. was relying on in October, when all 17 intelligence agencies signed onto a statement attributing the Democratic National Committee hack to Russia.
Most importantly, the story describes that the Intelligence Community got new information. Wow! An explanation for why the assessment changed in December 2016!!!! All readily available if you just check Tulsi’s sources!!
Just as importantly, nothing in the article addresses tampering with the voting infrastructure, the topic of almost all the other screen caps in Tulsi’s propaganda, in her effort to conflate the voting infrastructure, the hack and leak, and the larger information operation.
There are a slew of other problems with Tulsi’s book report. It ignores:
- The Russian investigation into Trump didn’t arise out of this intelligence. It arose out of Mike Flynn’s efforts to undermine the Obama sanctions on Russia in response, and Trump’s efforts to undermine the investigation of Flynn.
- The Russian investigation discovered abundant new evidence, including proof that Trump’s campaign learned of Russia’s operation in advance. Trump’s Coffee Boy, Campaign Manager, National Security Advisor, personal lawyer, and rat-fucker were all eventually adjudged to have lied to cover up aspects of Trump’s involvement in the Russian investigation. And through their confessions, we learned that Russia dangled an impossibly lucrative real estate deal, told a Trump campaign official and his rat-fucker about their operation, got campaign data and strategy — possibly in exchange for millions of dollars and involvement in a plan to carve of Ukraine — and then undermined Obama’s foreign policy to help Russia.
- After all these 2016 assessments, the NSA later developed evidence — according to the document Reality Winner leaked — that showed Russia did attempt to and had some success in hacking voting infrastructure.
Which is to say, Tulsi’s entire little book report is unrelated to the Russian investigation into Trump and her claims about hacking the election infrastructure were eventually revised.
But her report is not without interest.
If her story is true — if there is a shred of truth to her claims that Obama tried to alter the intelligence in 2016 — then evidence to that fact was available in 2020, when Kash Patel was reviewing precisely the same intelligence while serving as Ric Grenell’s handler, and that evidence was available from 2019 through 2023, when John Durham reviewed it all and determined that the spooks did nothing wrong.
In other words, if Tulsi’s allegations are true, it means Kash Patel and John Durham are part of the Deep State plot against Donald Trump!!!!
It means Trump’s hand-picked FBI Director was part of a sustained effort to cover-up Obama’s devious intervention in 2016.
If Tulsi’s allegations have any merit, then Pam Bondi must fire Kash Patel and include him, right along with all the nefarious actors Tulsi targets, because Kash covered this up when he could have helped Trump win the 2020 election.
Update: Corrected how long the primary document collection is.
Links
A Dossier Steal: HPSCI Expertly Discloses Their Own Shoddy Cover-Up
Think of the HPSCI Report as a Time Machine to Launder Donald Trump’s Russia Russia Russia Claims
Tulsi Gabbard and John Ratcliffe Reveal Putin “Was Counting on” a Trump Win
Tulsi Gabbard Teams Up with Russian Spies to Wiretap and Unmask Hillary Clinton
The Secrets about Russia’s Influence Operation that Tulsi Gabbard Is Still Keeping from Us
Tulsi Gabbard Accuses Kash Patel of Covering Up for the Obama Deep State
To quote Pervical Cox, M.D. and what he might say to Tulsi Gabbard, “Do you actually listen to yourself when you speak, or do you find that you drift in and out?”
Is Gabbard throwing red meat against the wall to see what sticks cuz boss told her to distract the rubes from Epstein, did she make this up cuz she was told to find “proof” that the 2020 election was rigged but couldn’t find anything, or does she marinate in this crap so much that she actually believes she found “TEH ANSWER!” [sic]?
The answer to that is “yes”.
One finger, five guesses, the first four don’t count. :P
Let’s skip the answer you gave, and which answer do you think most likely?
The middle finger, of course.
I vote for answer #2. And I would guess that the whole thing was created by staff, in a rush, to “prove” that Russia, Russia, Russia was a hoax because that would (how?) make it seem more credible that the Birthday Letter, a perfect letter, was also a hoax.
The bitch is trying to save her job after fucking up on Iran by publicly engaging in TDS (Trump D*cksucking Syndrome).
Elmo let the dogs out with Epstein. I can’t stand Lilo & Switch either, but I think Iran was just a spicy distraction from Epstein. IMO, Iran knew what was going to happen way before it did. Shoot, probably most people online who pay attention had an idea for a week or more.
Be more explicit about your subjects rather than using coded names/phrases like “Lilo & Switch.” It’s not a frequently used label here.
As for Iran: I seriously doubt US military force against Iran without Congressional approval on behalf of Israel was intended as mere distraction considering the risk it could pose to Trump as a reason for impeachment and removal if the GOP Senate caucus snapped out of its hostage mode. Iran also has decent intelligence AND the Trump regime leaks like a sieve — why wouldn’t Iran have a clue in advance?
How sad that Ms. Gabbard and apparently the entire Republican Party in America are willing to waste the resources of the greatest intelligence gathering organization created in human history, trying to undo reality and absolve the crimes and international malfeasance of an incompetent, sexually deviant criminal like Donald Trump! This little work of fiction by Ms. Gabbard represents a gigantic squandering of American assets.
Unless the Gabbard was just following her orders – not from pResident trump or from her oath to her office; but from those that are in opposition to the US and its democracy. I’m pretty sure I’ve heard many times that this Gabbard is rather close to the russians.
Professor Joseph Mifsud agrees with Marcy’s conclusions.
Just a quick step back to reality:
Donald Trump publicly requested the Russians “get” Hillary’s e-mails.
The Russians immediately complied by hacking the DNC.
Trump’s cutouts coordinated with Russian proxy Julian Assange of Wikileaks to release weaponized data from the hack to subvert the American election in 2016.
This was to prevent Hillary from having a fair shot at getting elected. Trump and the Kremlin’s goals were totally aligned and Trump did his best to assist Russian efforts to subvert the possibility of a HRC Presidency at best and at least to delegitimize/hamstring a Hillary Presidency (should she win) over the next four years.
IMO, this is treasonous behavior because I view subversion of American elections by a foreign power as an act of war. Trump was tempted with big $$$ in a Trump Tower Moscow to the effect that he signed formal letter of intent to buy.
It’s pay for play of subversion.
PLEASE correct me if anything in my post is incorrect.
The RNC was also hacked, but that got left out of most stories.
Thanks for bringing that back up and saving me the effort. As I recall, none of the RNC hacked info has ever been released. Kompromat perhaps?
It always seemed to me another example of “both siderism”. See, the russkis don’t play favorites.
Thank you. Would’ve been good to add that. 100% Correct. My guess is when you’re a Kremlin agent and you retain hacked information it’s for leverage. The kind of leverage that keeps you from sanctioning a country or keeps you from sending arms to supply the country Putin’s in the midst of trying to destroy. They’re all incredible bastards.
Thank you. The “active measures” wiki literally has a whole section about this under “Russian Federation active measures, 1991 to present.” And we’ve got Captain Aloha Hot Take trying to make Obama treason happen to distract from Trump’s BFF Epstein.
Again, be more explicit about your subjects rather than using coded names/phrases. “Captain Aloha Hot Take” is offensive because it culturally appropriates and abuses a Hawaiian word in an attempt to do the opposite of what aloha means.
Name her or don’t waste the bits and pixels.
Thank you for being an assistant moderator to the moderator who approved these comments. The world would be better if the English language and others didn’t appropriate words from other languages.
1. “Aloha” is a widely used term in Hawaiʻi.
• Tulsi used “Aloha” heavily in her branding and political messaging.
• “Aloha” has become part of her public persona, so referencing it satirically reflects her usage, not necessarily the deeper cultural meaning.
• It’s similar to how people might say “Zen Master” in jest about someone always calm; it’s not necessarily mocking Zen Buddhism directly, but playing on the stereotype.
2. “Captain Aloha” is a jab at her branding, not Native Hawaiian people.
• The “Captain” part mocks her assertive and often combative delivery of “peace and love” messages, especially when paired with controversial takes.
• It’s not mocking a traditional Hawaiian role, deity, or sacred practice. It’s aimed at her media persona.
3. Satire targets individuals, not cultures.
• It critiques performance, not ethnicity or heritage.
To the few dozen people who will read these comments, it’s obvious who I was referring to, especially in the context of the original comment.
First, you’re new here. You’ve already been cut some slack because I recognize you’re new.
Second, I’m Hawaiian heritage. Tulsi is NOT aloha spirit, she’s a blight on it. Stop using your weak sauce excuse for diluting aloha which is also based in Hawaii state law.
Third, there’s a brand “Captain Aloha” which also appropriates the Hawaiian word but it’s a brand. You’re abusing and diluting that brand, too.
Fourth, you wouldn’t know satire if it slapped you.
Fifth, I’ve been moderating here for well over a decade. When I tell you your labeling or phrasing is obscure, it’s based on my background at this site. Take a seat in the shade for a while; I strongly recommend you spend more time getting familiar with the culture here before you comment again.
In Tulsi’s defense, one trait common among people who look for facts to support their conclusions is the inability to understand context. Because their conclusions are wrong they’re desperate to find any proof and will take a fragment of a sentence out of a book that disproves them and proudly show it as the only words that matter.
It’s possible Tulsi did this intentionally but it’s rare for people to make it easy to debunk them. And it’s not likely she did this research herself. She tasked others to find proof so that’s what they did and she probably didn’t check the sources either because these people trust anything that affirms their beliefs.
The human mind is much better at rationalization than rational thinking and most folks confuse one for the other. And they can’t separate facts from speculation and use their imagination as a primary source, then think it’s a conspiracy if they can’t find the evidence in the real world.
Well said: “The human mind is much better at rationalization than rational thinking”
I know I’m guilty of that frequently. It’s easier to go with a current “model” than try to incorporate new information into that “model” (to borrow from the hype.)
OT, however highly relevant. Aired on PBS Tuesday, July 15, 2025
Trump’s Power & the Rule of Law (full documentary) | FRONTLINE
FRONTLINE goes inside the showdown between U.S. President Donald Trump and the courts over presidential power.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28sQyweAPRs
or
https://www.pbs.org/video/trumps-power-the-rule-of-law-lib2xk/
Sunday, July 20th 2025
Fox News: “And we begin this Sunday with the biggest scandal of them of the all: Collusion against President Trump.”
(Referencing Tulsi’s report)
https://www.foxnews.com/media/tulsi-gabbard-details-bombshell-claims-obama-era-cabals-treasonous-conspiracy-against-trump
======
Oh, my bad. I would think having a President who ran in pedophile circles would be the biggest scandal this Sunday.
They’re really trying hard to ignore that, if they’re having to go back to 2016 and Obama.
Indeed. MAGAts are still traumatized by a two-term black POTUS. One commenter said that Obama isn’t even black.
I wrote: Oh, have you racists dropped the one-drop rule?
mt–thanks for staying on top of Tulsi’s dis-information operation. my opinion is that the more this retread tries to stir things up to aid Felon, Inc., the more it will blow up in their faces. things that used to take months to digest, distill and deduce can now often be done within minutes b/c of the moronicity, lack of coordination, utter bad faith, and/or Felon One’s chronic verbal diarrhea. i appreciate your taking the time to sift this goofy stuff, yet knowing your vast knowledge of the matter and the absurd amateurishness of the Bride of Putinstein, it must be like shooting fish in a barrel for you