How Chuck Grassley’s Politicized Redactions Gave Putin Leverage over Trump

After making Canada, Japan, Vietnam, and Switzerland go to the US and making the EU go to Trump’s golf course in Scotland to negotiate tariffs, Trump sent his real estate developer buddy, Steve Witkoff, to Moscow to negotiate tariffs with Vladimir Putin.

I would have low expectations that Witkoff, who has gotten his ass handed to him at every turn, would negotiate a reasonable deal with Russia in any case.

All the more so given the politicized release of old documents on Russia that Tulsi Gabbard has orchestrated in recent weeks.

Consider just this redaction in the classified Durham appendix that Chuck Grassley released last week.

As I laid out here, the redaction is designed to fool readers in several ways.

First, it helps to sustain a fiction that the draft SVR memo purporting to report Hillary Clinton approving a plan to smear Donald Trump is the first document in a series, and not the last. That, in turn, serves to suggest that what I call the Deep State memo, laying out a plan by SVR to frame Hillary came after the draft memo, rather than laid out a plan to fabricate the memo, complete with fabricated emails including Russian idioms attributed to Leonard Benardo.

But that’s not right. The Deep State email was, Durham described, sent on July 26. The draft SVR email incorporates an email fabricated on July 27.

Indeed, after this Deep State email, Russian spies talked about “mak[ing] [something]” — that is, fabricating emails — to “illuminate” how Clinton wanted to “vilif[y]” Trump and Putin, proposing an initial fabricated July 25 email promising to, “put more oil into the fire,” but not yet adding reference to the doping scandal that was contemporaneously a very sore subject for Russia. The email with the reference to the Olympics, dated July 25 but almost certainly fabricated on July 27, is the one that was incorporated into the draft SVR memo.

In response, those Russian spies said … we don’t know what, but we do know that they attached the fabricated July 27 email purporting to reflect Hillary approving that plan on July 26.

I’d love to know what that email says; it may make it more clear that this was all a great plan to frame Hillary Clinton, or it may reveal other parts of the plan, possibly pertaining to Guccifer 2.0. But I don’t need to know what it says to know that the email gives Putin great leverage over Donald Trump at the moment that Trump finally tries to assert a strong hand with the Russian dictator.

By hiding that email in an attempt to hide that what Trump has claimed for eight years was an effort by Hillary to frame Trump was — is, still — a wildly successful attempt by SVR to frame Hillary, Trump’s top spies — Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director and Useful Idiom John Ratcliffe, and FBI Director Kash Patel — have all sustained a secret with Russia’s spies, a secret Kash has been chasing all that time, a secret that could legally implicate at least Ratcliffe and Kash (not least because they sustained this campaign during the time they were private citizens) in a crime.

Trump’s top spies are keeping a secret: the secret that for the last eight years Trump has carried out precisely the plan to frame Hillary Clinton that those SVR spies first ginned up on July 26, 2016.

And here’s the thing. Putin’s spies know much of what is behind that redaction. They can reverse engineer it because the footnote to it shows that the email in question is the one to which those Russian spies attached that fake July 27 email, nine years ago. They still have that email. Hell, it’s probably hanging in a gilt-edged frame somewhere, Putin’s trophy from a wildly successful attempt to compromise the Main Enemy.

So that redaction is not, as a classification redaction should, keeping any secrets from our adversaries. The Russian spies know what is too embarrassing for Grassley and Tulsi and Kash and Ratcliffe to release.

But we don’t.

And that’s why this entire frenzy to release more secrets just in advance of this meeting with Putin has made Trump far, far weaker.

Donald Trump cares more about his claims of grievance, a fake grievance that has always gotten him out of jams, than he does about America, to say nothing of Ukraine.

And Chuck Grassley’s willful protection of this secret between Putin’s spies and Trump’s has only served to give Putin leverage over Trump and over the United States.

Share this entry
13 replies
  1. Ginevra diBenci says:

    “Useful Idiom John Ratcliffe”–brilliant. Intentional or not, it’s still brilliant. Ratcliffe has rendered himself an idiom in all this, and nothing more.

    This brilliant post, with its rumination on what Russia knows that we’re being kept in the dark about, has me wondering how much Russia knows about the contents of the so-called Epstein Files–that is, to what extent Trump is implicated in Epstein and Maxwell’s conduct. As your earlier post indicated, Trump’s crimes may not be those of commission but rather omission. That is, he knew full well what the pedophiles were up to and yet did nothing but enjoy their company, for years.

  2. GKJames25 says:

    How much of what comes out of Grassley’s office is his doing vs. that of his (younger and more rabid) staff?

  3. JonathanW says:

    It feels to me like Russia has leverage over most of the GOP at this point, given the extent to which much of the party and its voters have come to see the rest of America as the real enemy from within. I’ve long read various right-wing and GOP aligned sites and have watched the evolution from policy disagreements to outright detestation.

      • P J Evans says:

        Some are still in Congress.
        Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT), Sen. John Hoeven (R-ND), Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), Sen. Jerry Moran (R-KS), Sen. John Thune (R-SD), Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX).

  4. BRUCE F COLE says:

    It occurs to me that Putin has a pretty big dog in this hunt, and that is the one still on the scent of Geoff Pyatt and PNAC founder Kagan’s wife, Tori Nuland, who were caught by probably some of those same SVR or GRU hackers tapping their phones during the ’14 maelstrom of Maidan, as they were discussing whom she wanted installed in the new UKN govt to replace just-ousted RU pigeon Yanukovich, like chess players discussing gameboard strategy. Oh, and their “suggestions” panned out for the most part. Now Hillary wasn’t SoS anymore at that point, but Nuland had served as her spokesperson when she was SoS. Nuland began her “advisory” role in State affairs under Cheney during Bush II’s first term. That phone-tap was a thumb in Putin’s eye, and the bruise never healed, that’s my guess, and the invasions of UKN were largely about that. It was also for domestic consumption as an antidote to “Fearless Leader has been bested” that Maidan undoubtedly fostered in the Kremlin and into the countryside.

    BTW, Sochi Olympics, which was sporadically dropped into a couple Russian edits of one of the Patel-palmed emails as an RU irritant, had their closing ceremonies overshadowed as UKN fell into revolt and Yanukovich was about to flee in the wake of Maidan.

    As the Sochi Games wound down, violence escalated on the streets of the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv. Scores of people were killed by sniper fire during a showdown between police and protesters rallying against a decision by the pro-Moscow government to cancel an integration deal with the European Union.

    Just as the Sochi Olympics were closing, protesters in Kyiv forced President Viktor Yanukovych to leave the capital and flee to Russia. Putin saw those demonstrations as part of a U.S.-orchestrated plot to humiliate Moscow.

    https://apnews.com/article/russia-sochi-olympics-anniversary-putin-ukraine-451c65399bcb468ec3a22035451aa519

    It also occurs to me that it’s becoming more evident that Trump’s newly minted saber rattling with Putin and Medvedev is cover, a show of antipathy toward Russia as his agitprop crew is using regurgitated Russian spycraft to hope to skewer the rapidly growing US antifascist opposition coalition (which of course includes the Cheneys as well) — and to hopefully neuter his many Russian entanglements concerning his association with Epstein.

  5. phichi174 says:

    thanks for tying together as many of these loose threads together as is practicable. surely looks like the GOP work for Putin and daily betray their own country, from which they draw their salaries (in addition to whatever ruzzia is paying them for their treachery)

  6. john paul jones says:

    Hoping this isn’t too much OT. Over at Lawfare, Renee DiResta has a long piece on the various Tulsi/Grassley/Ratcliffe threads:

    https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/from-russian-interference-to-revisionist-innuendo–what-the-gabbard-files-actually-say

    Her conclusion:

    It is, candidly, very difficult to understand what the point of all of this is. … The usual suspects are obliging with solemn pronouncements about how very serious this all is. But the fact is, there’s no there here. The Gabbard Files are hanging the awfully serious allegation of a “treasonous coup” on nothing of substance. Russia interfered. That’s not in dispute. We can quibble about the 2017 ICA, but it wasn’t material to the launch of the collusion investigation, which began six months prior. The effort here isn’t to uncover new facts. It’s to recast old ones—to erode the baseline consensus that interference happened at all, and to muddy the waters with revisionist innuendo.

    Worth a read.

  7. rattlemullet says:

    Everything makes sense by just knowing the tRump is working as a Russian asset for Putin and working against America. Every foreign policy decision he has taken has benefited Russia.

  8. dopefish says:

    Sorry for this off-topic comment. I wanted to point out this article at Politico about the DOJ attempting to sanction a California lawyer for a pro-bono effort to delay the deportation of an immigrant from Laos.

    Legal experts described the sanctions motion against Schroeder, which hasn’t been previously reported, as highly unusual. DOJ brought the disciplinary action after Schroeder asked federal judges to stop the deportation of his client, Vang Lor. In emergency court papers seeking to block the deportation, Schroeder cited the administration’s aggressive effort to expel other foreigners under the Alien Enemies Act, and he argued that his own client might be unlawfully ensnared in that effort.

    It sounds like the DOJ is unlikely to get their sanctions, but there will likely be a chilling effect on other lawyers daring to oppose them, and maybe that was the real goal?

    • P J Evans says:

      Trying to scare off legitimate lawyers sounds like this maladministration.

      Also OT: Vance and his family took a vacation on a stream in Ohio, and he asked that water be released from a dam upstream so it would be safer for them, instead of rescheduling or changing plans.
      https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/8/6/2337179/-Vance-Raise-the-river-my-family-s-cruising
      Like the trip do Disneyland, where his family and their massive security team blocked ticketed riders, or the previous trip where people with reservations were bumped so he and his could see whatever it was. He thinks he’s king, or at least c*own prince.

  9. klynn says:

    IANAL nor intel expert, but I went back and reread around a dozen articles/posts from the period the Dutch caught the Russians infiltrating/hacking the DNC emails. I may be misunderstanding but it appears the Dutch have the email trove the Russians messed with? I confirmed they obtained a collection of internal Russian intelligence reports and memos, however some articles reference the emails RU (Cozy Bear) gathered, while some articles state “snippets of emails.” My brain is a bit rusty but if they have copies of the hacked and doctored emails, the Dutch intel could “reverse engineer” to figure out the missing email couldn’t they? And if yes, the Dutch could release everything without redactions?

Comments are closed.