Right Wingers Dick-Stepping Their Way Through Shutdown
I don’t think Democrats have done a particularly good job of winning the shutdown.
But the Republican Party has taken every opportunity to step on their own dicks in ways that might actually backfire.
Democrats are starting with a surprising advantage. In one of the first polls after the shutdown started, WaPo showed that far more people blamed Republicans than Democrats, a much higher number than G Elliot Morris showed in his poll before the shutdown (possibly because WaPo included Trump in their question).
Even as voters are looking for compromise, right wingers spent much of the last two days posting dickish gotchas for their social media trolls, starting with the series of racist posts featuring someone in a sombrero.
These aren’t even funny trolls, and to the extent that they lead to questions where Mike Johnson or JD Vance defend them by claiming that Dems should just ignore them, they make right wingers look like they’re not serious about reopening government.
Both the White House and their Rapid Response account similarly posted a very brief gotcha from an appearance Jeanne Shaheen made on Fox and Friends. Jeanne Shaheen is probably the key person in any negotiations to peel off enough Democrats to reopen government, and Republicans want to maintain good will with her. Five minutes into the interview, Lawrence Jones played a debate clip from 2019, claiming the entire Democratic party wants to give undocumented people health insurance.
Shaheen’s response was not bad; she accused, “you’re making it an issue, Vice President Vance is making it an issue.” Shaheen distinguished the current debate about the current health insurance plans.
The full clip was even stronger. Before the gotcha, Shaheen described that over 70% of the people who rely on ACA subsidies are in states Trump won; 56% are in Republican districts. She described her goal was to make sure we’re not doubling the premiums for 24 million Americans and kicking 4 million Americans off their health insurance.
Shaheen was explaining much of this to Fox viewers who don’t yet know these details. KFF has a poll showing that 61% of Americans are not yet aware of looming ACA increases, but when asked, huge majorities support extending them — including 57% of MAGAts.
ACA subsidies weren’t the only thing Shaheen exposed Fox viewers to: She also described that EMTALA, which requires emergency rooms to treat everyone and is the only way that undocumented people do get coverage, was put in place by Ronald Reagan.
She dismissed Jones’ quip about the WaPo editorial warning Democrats that they had fallen into a trap because Trump would start cutting programs by noting he was already doing that. So she looked smart on Trump’s breakfast pablum, and they tried to discredit her with a gotcha that didn’t even land.
Shaheen’s point that Trump was already cutting was the only reference she made to impoundment (and she didn’t describe it as such).
But Russ Vought has been busy making that point.
Wednesday I argued that for Trump to use cuts to attempt to pressure Democrats, he needs to make that visible, which might have the same effect Elon Musk’s boisterous face on DOGE did.
What changes with Trump’s promise that he’s going to start retaliating against Democrats — on top of the fact that 40% of the workers he will be targeting are Trump voters and on top of the fact that the policies he will target are the ones that help average Americans and so are popular — is that to use this as leverage, Trump has to claim credit.
Trump has to make visible all the damage he’s doing to the services government offers.
That doesn’t change the legal reality (that, with SCOTUS’ blessing, Trump is usurping the constitutional powers of Congress). It has the ability to change the politics. It’ll be DOGE all over again, where Elon Musk’s loud bragging about the damage he was doing made him an easy political target.
Now it’s Russ Vought’s turn to become the villain in the popular understanding.
And so he did.
Hours after I wrote that, Vought announced the government (this was actually Department of Transportation) was cutting two big NYC transport projects, including the rail tunnel that connects the city with its suburbs in New Jersey.
Mikie Sherrill, who had been giving Democrats pains because of a single close gubernatorial poll (while others showed her with a bigger lead), immediately responded by making it a campaign issue.
Then Vought announced $8 billion in funding cuts in the swing states where both Senators are Democrats.
As Aaron Fritschner has been calculating, many of these projects hit Republican congressional districts, including swing state districts like David Valadao, Young Kim, and Mike Lawler that Republicans would need to
Politico has more, including a link to Rosa DeLauro’s breakdown of what got cut, organized by Congressional district.
Terminating funding to the hydrogen “hub” projects in California and the Pacific Northwest — which were to receive $1.2 billion and $1 billion, respectively, through the 2021 infrastructure law — comes despite bipartisan support for those projects. The Pacific Northwest hydrogen hub includes GOP-led Montana, as well as Washington state and Oregon.
Washington state Republican Rep. Dan Newhouse, whose district would be home in part to the Pacific Northwest hub, had touted the project in an April op-ed, saying it “will support the administration’s focus on energy independence and domestic energy production.”
Americans may no longer go to the same schools as their political opponents. But they do rely on the same infrastructure.
Note, technically both of these cuts were end-of-year rescissions, not shutdown cuts. Maybe Vought will find a way to hurt only Democrats in whatever he has planned next. But even there, Republicans are warning that it may backfire.
But even pro-DOGE Republicans are warning Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought to go slow.
“Russ is less politically in tune than the president,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., a member of the Senate DOGE Caucus. “We, as Republicans, have never had so much moral high ground on a government funding bill in our lives. … I just don’t see why we would squander it, which I think is the risk of being aggressive with executive power in this moment.”
Worse, anonymous sources point out that if Vought attempted to RIF people, he would be incurring costs, breaking the law in new ways, something that could put Vought’s larger victories in firing people at risk.
For example, the Antideficiency Act prohibits the federal government from obligating or expending any money not appropriated by Congress. It also forbids incurring new expenses during a shutdown, when funding has lapsed; some federal government officials have concluded that the prohibition could extend to the kind of severance payments that accompany reductions in force.
[snip]
Asked about the legal concerns, Rachel Cauley, the White House OMB communications director, said in a written statement that “issuing RIFs is an excepted activity to fulfill the President’s constitutional authority to supervise and control the Executive Branch, similar to conducting foreign policy.”
Meanwhile, one of the issues that I thought was just going to be create a background of malaise — the soybean crisis and the Argentine bailout — just became part of the fight as well. For starters, after some equivocating, Trump decided to shut down USDA’s Farm Service Agency, meaning the farmers who’ve been pummeled by Trump’s tariffs will face delays in getting loans.
Thousands of USDA’s Farm Service Agency offices that help producers across the country access loans and other services are completely shuttered and only available for “emergency scenarios.” Even top Republican lawmakers acknowledge the pain hitting their own constituents, despite assurances from President Donald Trump that Democrats will bear the brunt of the shutdown.
“FSA employees are important to the farmers that we all represent. Again, that’s an unnecessary consequence of the Schumer shutdown,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who represents an agriculture-heavy state, said in an interview Wednesday.
Those offices normally close during shutdown. But Trump officials had previously debated contingency options to keep at least some of them open since this year’s funding lapse would hit at an especially poor time for farmers who are already reeling from Trump’s tariff fallout and currently preparing for harvest season.
Ultimately, the Trump administration decided to close the offices, allowing one farm loan officer to be on call in most areas if the shutdown drags on longer than 10 days. Other select employees will be on call for natural disaster response.
Partly because of the bailout Trump just gave Argentina, Trump needs to pay off the right wing farmers whose lives he has ruined with his trade war. But he doesn’t have the money to do that — or an easy way to get it.
The Trump administration is planning to roll out the first tranche of bailout payments for farmers in the coming weeks, likely using billions of dollars in funding from an internal USDA account, according to three people with direct knowledge of the matter.
But it won’t be enough: USDA’s Commodity Credit Corporation fund — which President Donald Trump previously tapped to provide $28 billion in farm aid during his first-term trade war with China — has just $4 billion left in the account. Trump officials, including those at the Treasury Department, are looking at how to tap tariff receipts or other funding to supplement the payments without triggering a messy fight in Congress.
The timing of the actual aid rollout is also tricky given that it’s unlikely to happen or even be possible during the ongoing government shutdown that’s shuttered vast swaths of the Agriculture Department.
Trump officials are still working on estimates of how big the first tranche of aid will be, according to the three people, who were granted anonymity to share private details. But the president has been posting his promises to aid American soybean farmers on social media in recent days.
Republicans seem certain that they’ll peel off enough Democrats — starting with Shaheen — in the Senate to reopen government. They may be right. Or, right wingers may continue to step on their own dicks making the case that Democratic funding priorities are right.












Another underlying factor that the GOP has failed to take into account is that they are the literal architects of the federal government shutdown, lock stock and barrel. It’s their invention and trademark.
I’d love to see Warren give a speech on the history of the disastrous practice, going back to Gingrich in the early ’90s, and tie their past motivations for it to the evisceration of US government they’re executing now.
They were responsible for budget delays in California in the 80s and 90s. Tom McClintock once campaigned on never having voted *for* a budget. He was representing part of Ventura county, even while running for Congress (and winning) from NorCal.
That’s the GOP, aka the Rules Are for Suckers Party.
That was during the time when 2/3 majorities were needed to pass a budget (due to Proposition 13) which was later modified downward because of the GOP tantrums over spending they didn’t like.
I voted against 13 and for 7, which was saner. I still check to see which side the zombie Jarvis is on.
Me, I’m an innocent bystander (actually, I’m not because Farage and Kemi just seem to want to copy all the worst things that Trump does, but that’s another story), but I would suggest that the Democrats accept the inevitable and let the shutdown roll on until The People are heartily sick of it and then let Trump (or his minions) try and talk his way out of his shit yet again; let the people see exactly how awful life will be in TrumpWorldTM.
I know it hurts to let people suffer, but maybe if they get a proper taste of what they’re in for under the Full Trump?
Yep. A lot of Trump voters are enrolled in ACA healthcare exchanges and don’t even know it. Some states have renamed ACA or Obamacare to other names. For example, in Minnesota, it’s known as “MNSure”. In California, it’s known as “Covered California” etc. etc. So a lot of MAGA red-and-blue-state citizens are already making use of the ACA, while being unaware of that fact.
Time for the FO part of FAFO. Higher premiums start in 1/26. Premium notices showing much higher prices will be commonly known about before the holidays arrive this year.
I was part of Covered California for 4 years before Medicare kicked in for me and in the last year I was paying $700+ per month in premiums, and that was with the subsidies. Don’t know how I could have afforded it otherwise…
Big Bad Bill
1.
In the land of Screw-you-ville
They’ve got a plan scrawled: Big Bad Bill
Stephen M yells: grab ‘em by the scruff
Duffer shouts bad stuff
Neighbor folks are scared to death
Big Bad Bill with ICE man cometh
And in Russell Vought’s plan sure enough
Billionaires get highlife
and the rest of us get strife
Chorus:
Big Bad Bill is “cheat millions” now
Glaring light has changed it somehow
It’s the plan MAGA all used to cheer
Now people see over billing clear
It was almost an anthem, I declare
Till we see Russell Vought’s plan isn’t fair
Big Bad Bill ain’t right any more
It just dishes and it slops the floor
No reason to believe in
such a brutish slight
Now we’ve shone the daylight
on billionaires’ spite
‘Cause Big Bad Bill is “cheat millions” now
2.
I must say we’ve been short-changed
We see the way the plan’s deranged
Recurring lyin’ is a flimflam
Big Bad Bill, a scam
It’s a joke, it stinks like poo
They’ve lost our votes, it’s deep doo-doo
We see through the Republicans’ sham
And we hear neighbors say:
Big Bad Bill, Now Go Away!
Chorus:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDWnniCWFrc
“Big Bad Bill (1924)”
As a long-time Van Halen fan, I heartily approve this message! :-)
Savage Librarian, your musical library must rival the Smithsonian. And your ability to grab references–this one over a century old!–is rivaled BY no one, certainly no one I know. Mitch Miller, now “Big Bad Bill.” When do we get Burl Ives?
I missed the Miller, but this one’s a wonnaful, a wonnaful.
Knowledge-bombed us with the fact that Mitch Miller played the oboe on Charlie Parker’s “Just Friends”!
Maybe the D’s should go with.
Look there’s the easy way, or there’s the hard way…
Youse guys could do the 25th amendment, you could join us for an impeachment “Third time’s a charm has a nice ring” – or we could repeal the BBA and restore funding.
Oh and by the way, when are we going to do something about discrediting/relabeling Faux news as Fap News. I mean, it is all about helping republican’s pleasure themselves amirite?
Project 2025: We know Trump was telling the truth when he said “I haven’t read it.” He reads nothing but news clippings about himself, if that. But maybe the shutdown can be used to demonstrate that he was fully on board with its highly unpopular authoritarianism and Dominionist Christian goals for all Americans. I hope Democrats can hang it around his (and Stephen Miller’s) neck, along with the naked fact that none of their promises–NONE of them, including the mass deportations of “millions of criminals”–have been fulfilled.
Let them eat cake? MAGA’s motto might as well be Let Them Eat Nothing. And when they choke on it, let them die because the hospital had to close.
The issue is, even if Trump hasn’t kept ANY of his promises, trying to argue that to the MAGA’s is a waste of time. They’ll say he kept ALL of his promises, and reality itself doesn’t matter.
He’s rich enough not to have to read. He has minions.
But the thing about him lying and shafting people? ‘I’m smart.’
That’s what some of his base love about him. They live vicariously through him because he does all the horrible things he does and gets away with it. (So far.)
I was wondering where the tariff payments go: they go to U.S. Treasury General Fund. Which I don’t think Trump can use as a piggy bank, can he?
It makes a whole lot more sense now, why he’s trying to screw with Treasury. It’s not just about interest rates.
As someone posted here a few days ago,
Billions in Taxpayer Dollars Have Become Virtually Untraceable
The Trump administration’s aggressive approach to overhauling the executive branch has obscured how federal dollars are actually being spent — even for the members of Congress.
https://www.notus.org/trump-white-house/billions-taxpayer-dollars-virtually-untraceable-appropriations-trump-omb-russ-vought
That is true: It’s as if Congress has never, ever, considered the possibility that the Executive Branch might refuse to spend appropriations Congress authorizes, and then use it for something else (or steal it entirely). Pushing the envelope is his MO and always has been. How they didn’t see this coming is, well, I guess it’s not a mystery at all, is it?
Tariff payments at least have a clear accounting path to Treasury, unlike the claw backs and rescissions underway.
Treasury department run by the Executive, clear accounting path, seriously ?
@xyxyxyxysays:
October 3, 2025 at 3:00 pm
Oops! I was thinking Federal Reserve.
So yeah, piggy bank…
And we all remember that photo op of Mnuchin (45 Treas.) with his arm candie holding up a sheet of $100s with the grin that only a real con artist would love.
And Trump, when he was still buddy-buddy with Elon, announced their intentions to visit Ft. Knox to check if the gold is all still there in February of this year. That trip never happened. Maybe the Mnuchin precedent from 2017 created bad optics? Wasamatter Trump? Bad optics has never stopped you (or Elon) from engaging in many other egregious activities…
Apparently the Ds are moving to investigate the ’17 trillion’ dollars recovered from tariffs as claimed at the UN and elsewhere by Convict-1 because no one knows where it went. Congress hasn’t been informed, and FWIW this more than enough to fund everything.
However, let’s also recall this is the same guy who said he reduced drug prices by ‘1,600%’ which is a mathematical impossibility, and also managed to bankrupt a casino.
I have been getting money back from my pharmacy when “buying” my medications, haven’t you?
About the casino bankruptcies and what Rayne wrote a few months ago about her feeling about the legitimacy of the bankruptcies.
And I don’t recall how far back their relationship goes.
And he wanting to keep the files away from view.
Did he somehow funnel the casino receipts to Epstein as, let’s say some “expense“, and then Epstein in cash under the books back to him?
Just wondering outloud.
Didn’t the ITC ruling about the tariffs force the money collected to be escrowed, or some such? Pretty sure the money can’t be spent anywhere until SCOTUS rules on legality.
Not gonna lie, the joy JD got from the sombrero memes kinda warmed my heart; especially the way he said the memes would stop if Democrats give up on saving Obamacare like he genuinely thinks he’s hurting our feelings. Dude is a six year old in a grown man’s body and is desperate for any kind of childish trolling he can get.
As for this issue, the real problem is that for decades rightwing grifters were pretending that all government spending is the fault of Democrats as if we’re pro-government because all non-defense agencies belong to us which is why they’re anti-government…and not because they oppose taxes and regulations. Now all the smart grifters are dead and Republicans are led by the rubes who thought that was literal and still don’t know what the government actually does.
On Foxnews x account it’s non-stop Dems fault and this Dem shutdown has to stop.
They’re inciting wackos to start violence.
It’s Trump J6 incitement.
Of course it is. Thanks for watching so I don’t have to.
They love to pretend that the Dems have power, even when the Dems are the minority party in Congress, thanks to R gerrymandering and lies.
The Democrats got some exposure on the Daily Show for cringey engagement in the Shutdown Meme War. It maybe cringey but I still love to see it, and for it to get enough attention to make the Daily Show. One video shows Democrats looking for Republicans to negotiate with, but they have all bailed on the negotiation.
https://youtu.be/SoZwKjQ0c18
The unfortunate truth is that the administration is doing what it wants. The courts have tried to throttle their policies, but the SCT has gone along with the ‘Unitary Executive’ kingship in all but a single case. The legislative branch is useless and appears to be complicit with the admin’s goals. It appears, to me, that the strategy, and counter strategies, have been gamed out by Project 2025 . The electoral map is being rearranged by their gerrymandering in a way that could very well succeed in locking Democrats out of the House. They believe that they only need 30% support to succeed.
Step-by-step we’re descending into a pit from which there isn’t an escape. I refuse to surrender, but I do believe that they’ve set a trap to destroy resistance, using force when necessary. They have the power of the connected interweb at their disposal. Facial recognition, license plate readers, databases and AI used to track and identify any and all that oppose their agenda.
Brave New World, indeed.
Let’s see if they have the balls to use this shutdown to eliminate whole agencies at Trump’s whim. If that happens and the GOP eunuchs in the House and Senate aid and abet this geriatric lunatic, it’s game over. Not only will huge swaths of civilized society be disrupted (e.g. airlines, trucking, food distribution) but thousands of angry and unemployed people are going to make acts of stochastic violence inevitable. Autocrats always underestimate the power of We the People. Any political party that steals thousands of jobs from people for no good reason is sowing the seeds of it’s own doom.
I am nonviolent AF, but if the destruction of huge swaths of civil society you correctly predict does happen, “stochastic” violence will be the least of their problems.
I’m visualizing something more like Mao overthrowing Chiang Kai-shek.
Goes without saying that a Democratic President trying to do these budgetary maneuvers wouldn’t get past Fifth Circuit and would certainly run aground with SCOTUS and their newfangled “Major Questions Doctrine”. Trump, meanwhile, will have lawsuits against his personal budgeting dismissed for lack of standing.
Well, it looks like a duck, and walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, so …
The reason they don’t care about harming their own constituents, IMHO, is because they intend to shut down the 2026 mid-term elections.
They are NOT going to relinquish power.
They may expect people to vote for them because they can control most of the media.
(Remember, elections are managed by states. Which have their own offices to fill, as well as local stuff.)
And let’s all wonder how we organize resistance when the internet is disrupted. As Far As I Know, all the major backbone ISPs are major corporations who have (or will) yield fealty to the regime. We’ve seen that in already in the Patriot Act interceptions of communications as well as the current major technological corporations changing behaviors.
It may be a slow dismantling of available sites, or blocking of users (people like us) from access. It may be selective filtering of content or even injection of regime-flavored content. Welcome to the world of the firewalls of the other dictatorships.
Most of us should already be familiarizing ourselves with mesh networks. They should be used already during natural disasters.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_mesh_network
Dissident activists used mesh networking during Hong Kong’s 2014 umbrella movement protests.
I agree. These “ad-hoc” networks can work well for individuals and groups that are fairly tech savvy and can operate away from our current (US?) main-stream information outlets.
I’m not sure how well EmptyWheel or substack or many other information hubs will be able to get their messages out. Agree that we ought to be thinking about these things!
There has been a hearing in El Paso the last number of days regarding the illegal actions of the TX legislature’s redistricting. IANAL, but I have seen coverage of expert witness testimony in the TX case on race-based gerrymandering. I don’t know where it goes from there, but perhaps CA, if it passes the redistricting by a public vote, will be the only place where redistricting as currently underway, is allowable. I believe there is a similar court action in MO in the same vein as TX. The Supremes may overrule lower courts of course, so there is that. But at least legal options are being exercised.
I hope voters look at the proposed redistricting and say “that’s a gerrymander” – because it *is*.